Kelly Farmer Additional Suspension

What’s the point of the sharps containers? Is it kind of like, well we know people are drugging their horses, but we also don’t want used needles and syringes around so let’s provide the disposal containers, etc to make sure we don’t get sued for needle stick injuries from trash left behind?

1 Like

Please don’t say her name three times while looking in the mirror, Snicklefritz!!! She’ll show up like Candyman

4 Likes

Interesting perspective from a year ago long before the present case blew up:
https://www.phelpssports.com/doping-vs-fair-play/

1 Like

I think it’s worth protecting poorly-paid human workers from needle sticks. Therein lies a legitimate reason for putting up sharps containers, beyond a mere CYA move on the part of show management.

6 Likes

There are also legitimate reasons that needles are being used at horse shows. There are medications that are legal and injectable (so long as you don’t do it within 12 hours of showing). Some people prefer to inject medications like Bute or Banamine rather than giving orally because they feel more sure that the horse got all the medication. Also, many of these horses live on the road for weeks or even months at a time, so they get routine maintenance like Adequan or Legend at the shows.

9 Likes

Wouldn’t it be better if all injections at horse shows had to be given by certified vet personnel, and that they be responsible for sharps disposal?

4 Likes

I suspect the “staple” in question is the typical skin staple used n place of suture thread. Not office supplies or building materials.

Mary Babick continues to be a credit to the sport. http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/a-year-later-we-need-to-show-our-integrity-in-all-that-we-do

8 Likes

Medical waste cannot be disposed of in landfills like regular trash. It has to disposed under very specific regulations.

1 Like

But without the proper disposal method you can bet the sharps will in the trash, hence the need for sharps container. I’m absolutely not in favor of only vets giving injectables… Another layer of expense on an already cost prohibitive sport. Not every injectable is a a “drug” per se, or a banned substance.

5 Likes

So what they are testing for ought to be the metabolites of the forbidden substances not the forbidden substance itself. You can contaminate an improperly handled sample with the drug itself but it would be damn near impossible to contaminate it with the metabolites thereof.

3 Likes

I have to say, it’s rather gratifying to see that Kelley hasn’t exactly taken WEF by storm in the first couple of weeks. Whether that’s because she’s riding everything clean or some other reason I don’t know, but she’s not owning the pro divisions as in the past.

10 Likes

That is correct - they test for the metabolites, not the specific substance.

1 Like

I’d bet money that she isn’t riding clean NOR are the people who are beating her.

I’m sure it is, but still not sure how that makes it any better. If your horse isn’t calm enough to do the hunters, find it another Ring to show in. Or maybe looks for other reasons why the horse is so unhappy or not doing what you are asking it to do.

3 Likes

I’m not arguing in favor of the use of staples to circumvent a drug rule. Merely pointing out that skin staples aren’t a savage procedure. As a roofing staple into the flesh might be.

1 Like

Couple of things…

Sharps containers are required in most public places…think it’s under the ADA regulations…and possibly OSHA bio hazard disposal protocol. It’s not the fault of the containers, removing them would require waivers from various govt agencies, disadvantage those who use them for legit reasons, like diabetics and vets, and result in syringes and used needles ending up in landfills or crushed on the ground around the barns…actually that happens now anyway. Pigs.

Other thing is it’s Chain of Custody with drug testing samples. Custody, as in anybody handling them in any way has to sign off. Several have called it Chain of Command…it’s tracking everybody who touches it. Probably started as a spell wreck correction but it’s been repeated often, Its a very good term and procedure to be aware of if you ever get drug tested or even have medical tests run that could be contaminated by sloppy handling or accidentally switched. After all, not following proper chain of custody has helped some pretty famous criminal cases get thrown out. Put some innocents in jail too.

In one of the statements (I think in the COTH article about the USEF Vet Committee meeting) it said that .

The records show that the “B” sample was put in freezer X.

The records show that the “B” sample was taken out of freezer Y for testing.

There is no record of the “B” sample being moved from freezer X to freezer Y.

So no proper chain of custody.

There may have also been something funny about the way in which the “B” sample was thawed, or otherwise prepared for testing.

1 Like

For those who insist that “sabotage” is just another excuse that only cheaters make: https://www.horsetalk.co.nz/2018/01/26/top-showjumping-horses-nobbled-world-cup-qualifier/

Is anyone really saying that sabotage is only a claim that cheaters make? Even the quoted post you used states “repeated excuses”. This (KF) situation is not a one time deal like the what occurred in the article you posted. Sorry, but years worth of issues and more than one violation hearing… it’s not a conspiracy against you. Follow the damn rules.

2 Likes