I personally love this idea. BUT if you’re an owner of a high dollar business investment horse who suddenly loses the ability to show and sustain that value, what now? You can sell it…for a fraction of the value since it can’t be shown. Do you turn it into a pasture ornament for 2 years and then try to make a go of it again? Do you donate it to an IHSA program for a write off (if that’s even legal with a horse that’s been set down)? Do you let some other trainer use it as a schoolie (and put miles on it and risk injury)? Or is that horse going to have a freak pasture accident? Some people would happily fund their horse’s temporary vacation. Some wouldn’t.
I don’t know sounds pretty terrible to me… if you want to push on a horses pressure point why not figure a way to do it with something on the inside of the brow band? driving a staple into a horses forehead sounds pretty uncomfortable to me… and i was pretty appalled that a vet was doing it?! the worst thing i ever had a vet suggest to calm my spirited jumper was a beer before our class… i asked him for me or the horse? he said both if necessary… ;p
Horses coming off a lot of Dex need months to clear there system and get back in shape. When they crash they look pretty bad. but once dependent on the drug they function quite well.
blame USE whose rules and regs are basically set up for Amateur Sport when the people most likely to fall foul are either Pros or hanging on to their Amatuer Status by the skin of their teeth.
and when one considers that all these rules/regulations/guide lines are so often originally drawn up by former or still competing or family of, riders it’s not a huge surprise that there are cracks one could drive a luxury 10horse/accomodation for 4 adults semi trailer, throughout the organizations “rules”.
Where are people’s morals? I don’t care if I had the worlds best hunter, I would not let the horse be in a program like KF and LG. I don’t think owners can be that dumb can they?
They see that KF and LG have horses that win big classes. They want their horse to win big classes and increase in value. Many of them just don’t care as long as their horses win big classes and increase in value.
I would think that most of the horses that they ride are ultimately for sale.
I imagine that people unscrupulous enough to consider some of this stuff would probably try to remove the horse’s microchip and sell it on to someone else who could re-chip it and show it as a different horse. Obviously the chip would make that harder, but I’m sure they’d find a work-around that didn’t involve a 6 figure loss.
Perhaps people would just not drug the horse in the first place if the penalty was harsh enough? I think many would, others would just try newer and worse ways to get around the rules.
Before you send the horse to another’s care, you have them sign a contract that they will not drug. And you insist that they be bonded for some or all of the horse’s value as security. Rich people insure.
There are ways to make this work. Some would rather it didn’t…
thats what I was thinking…also, I dont know many people who use cocaine that leave much residue on their fingers. And have we considered rider use? when will we start testing riders?
Concern for the horse is number one as we all agree. They have no voice in anything. Very sad…
As a rider, I would have NO desire to jump a horse that has been given a variety of drugs as mentioned throughout this thread. It is dangerous, and again risking the horse and ultimately the rider. It is just plain idiotic.
What I don’t quite understand is if prospective buyers KNOW they drug their horses, why buy? The horse is not (necessarily) going to be the same off the drugs so do KF and LG pass on the ingredients for their cocktails? Is it a risk that buyers take having the horse go through possible withdrawl or lowered performance by getting them off the drugs If the cocktail is bad enough (and for a long enough period of time) are there major health implications? I know that there are others out there drugging their horses, but the whole thing just seems crazy. I’m sure most of these horses are plenty talented and athletic and really don’t need the drugs, but for as much money as they go for I’d want to know for sure what they were like off them and I’d want them to have a long safe career.
Someone asked earlier in this thread, why Kelly Farmer might do this if she was so talented as a junior rider.
Greed.
She was successful as a junior and had a natural eye. Perhaps she got away with not using drugs in the beginning, but then built up her business, gained a number of wealthy owners, and she needed that edge every time out.
The hunters are not very forgiving of minor mistakes. Even a bit of exuberance can knock you out of a top placing. If she wants to stay on top, all the time, with expensive horses and wealthy owners continuing to back her, she needs those results.
As to why people buy from her? Perhaps the buyers care more about results than they do about the drugging. Or they are to busy to follow up on that level of detail.
I’d love to hear first hand from someone who has purchased a horse from Larry and Kelly. They must come with a list of the meds the horses show on? Otherwise what you get home would be entirely different and no one would purchase their product.
Kelley’s mom, Bibby Farmer Hill, was suspended for GABA use in a junior rider’s horse about 4 years ago. Sometimes the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree…
Not asking why she would do this. While I don’t agree with it, the why someone would do this isn’t hard to figure out. I’m wondering about the purchasing of horses who have gone through her program Surely to keep a business running it isn’t just “no-touch” owners involved who will keep the horse with LCF.
That was my thought. It was the groom. For sure. Absolutely. My second thought was accidental contamination seems entirely plausible. Non accidental contamination also sounds plausible. If I was in Vegas I honestly wouldn’t know where to put my money…
Greed but…also…she long ago (in the 90s) hitched her wagon to the wrong star way back when he was still with Trudie and showed up still glued to his side when he resurfaced after a multi year absence ( prompted by a long suspension). It’s a traditional reason women can make decisions not in their best interests. She can ride an impressive Hunter round, even on less then stellar mounts. Or she used to be, she could make an overpriced Green, POS sale horse look sound and easy jumping around back in the day.
While I don’t know anybody who bought from them, or anybody that would, did know somebody who HAD to sell (for serious personal reasons) who sent a horse to a local trainer with orders to sell within 90 days who then sent it to them them circa early 2000s. There were some issues with how they marketed and billed for it. Came home in 90 days and was not the same horse they sent up there for some time resulting in some lawyer action. Realize this can happen to anybody but when you see that same movie with the same cast enough times? It creates a trust issue, or should. Apparently some never saw that movie.
People that continue to place horses with her or who buy from her, knowing her pervious drug infractions, don’t care about the drugging. They care about results.