[QUOTE=siegi b.;6560833]
(Bolding is mine)
Noms, I have to disagree with your statement regarding the stallion testing at Silvercreek and the KWPN-NA. If you take the time and check what’s required for a Dutch stallion to become approved, you will find that the 30- or 70-day test at Silvercreek doesn’t meet Dutch standards. Having been to approvals in Holland, Germany and having seen the infamous Silvercreek videos I can tell you that there is quite a difference in quality within the various locations.
As a long-time breeder of Dutch horses I appreciate the strictness, thoroughness, and attention to “details” (such as bloodlines) the stallion candidates are subjected to by the approval committee. This continues once the initial approvals have been given and a stallion then has to convince with his offspring that he should continue to be approved. I don’t know of any other European studbook that is that strict… The stallions also have to meet stringent radiographic and semen testing requirements which are then published for everybody to see. The KWPN will on very rare occasion approve a stallion with less than perfect x-rays but with stellar bloodlines, but you will always be aware of the risk you’re taking breeding to him.
I think it’s a fallacy to look for “more stallions approved in the US” when you consider the numbers… In Holland they will start each year with around 800 stallion candidates and by the time they’ve gone through all of their selections and approvals the number is whittled down to may 15 - that represents a percentage of less than 2%. The folks in this country get upset when the judges at an inspection “only” approve 3 out of 7 presented… and that is BEFORE the stallion goes to the 30- or 70-day testing.
And when you get right down to it, do we really need more stallions in this country when you consider that the ones we already have get an average of 3 or 4 breedings a year??? Do you really think that would change for the better if we had MORE stallions here?[/QUOTE]
Seigi
I have taken the time to read what is required to approve a dutch stallion in the US. I OWN ONE, AN IMPORTED KWPN STALLION .
The KWPN does not accept the Silvercreek test, that is a fact. My point is that the Dutch have been invited to participate in the stallion testing and refused. Thats OK if they want to set up a separate test. THEN DO IT, dont just turn your nose up. Have a formal regular annual test. Dont make SOs guess on how to get an approved sallion. You can certainly read all the questions and confusion that people hare regarding the Dutch stallion approvals in the US.
I have respect for the desire to make the US approvals equivalent to the Dutch and the standards to be the same. I have not ever stated that the process should be inferior. HOWEVER THERE IS NO FORMAL PROCESS AT ALL. As for numbers of KWPN NA stallions I could care less if they never have another approved stallion. And fact is that most if not all US riders and trainers dont care what registry their horse belongs to. We dont have national bias, US riders want the best horse, whether it is Dutch, Hanoverian, Holstein, Oldenburg whatever.
If you take so much pride in the Dutsh registry then it is up to people like you, Dutch breeders, to get a better process. If you care then do something other than coming on here and criticizing the SC test.
I know your thoughts avout Silvercreeks test. I know you dont have any respect for it. But they are the only ones to offer US breeders a test at all.
Netherlands and Germany are separate countries with different breed registries. Actually quite divergent breeding goals. The US is one country establishing sport horse breeding. We dont need reciprocity with the foreign registries honestly.
By separating and making the process difficult for the US , the number of US Dutch stallions will eventually go to zero.
You dont think we need any more approved Dutch stallions in the US, well wait a few years and you will have your wish. The other US registries will carry on.