I find that if you put in the work before getting on them, it truly is a non event by the time you are on them for the first time. Starting my 3 year old last month, was a total non event.
If I had any hesitation, I would’ve sent him off to a trainer, and would’ve been very careful with my choice on who to send him to. It’s so important that they have the right start.
I do think only choosing a trainer from your desired discipline can be limiting. Are there dressage riders that are excellent at starting young horses? Absolutely. However, if the training ideas and care (if you’re doing training board) matches up, and the trainer rides western, I wouldn’t exclude them. That’s me though, and others are free to do as they wish.
I chat with 2 local trainers from time to time. One is western and has always been, the other rides western but did ride dressage in Europe for a number of years. Interestingly, all 3 of us (I am not a trainer though) are quite similar in how we start horses. We all want forward, stop, start, steer, and a confident horse. We all focus on groundwork so when you swing your leg over, it’s a non event. It’s also crucial to know when the horse is truly ready to be ridden. You absolutely do not want the trainer to rush the horse along.
It’s just so important to do your research. We have the internet at our disposal, so word of mouth can travel even faster and further. When you research, talk to, and visit a potential trainer, you really need to have your eyes wide open and feel comfortable.
I don’t think that every pro needs to be a “young horse starter” but I do think it should probably be a part of their resume, because there is so, so, much that you can learn and gain from the experience. The horse that I went the furtherst on (level/competition wise) and learned the most from was one I had from the very beginning of his riding career. I’ve had others I’ve started and sold just a few years later, but once I found the one I wanted to stick with, I had the best journey and the most success.
I did have success and learned a lot on the more experienced horses that I rode and/or bought, but there’s just something different about starting from the beginning. I do understand that it’s not for everyone. Starting and working with young horses is tough at times. Even when you do it right. It just takes a certain mentality and level of resilience. Granted, that applies to horses in general, but there are some unique components to starting a young horse.
Also, there will likely be a filtering process of sorts where you might start 6 young horses, but only stick with or make it to the top with one. Which is fine, if you can afford it time, money, and skill wise. Which I think that’s where much of the struggle lies in the US.
I do think it can be valuable and there just is something a bit different when it comes to having a horse from day one to day none, vs “taking over a ride” or going with an already trained horse. I do think success can be found both ways, but the homegrown concept and the points that LS brings up, should be considered for sure.
On a lighter note, I will say that this gave me a laugh when I read the article:
“There’s all sorts in this world, but a whole lot of us got into riding horses because we’re not that great with people.”
It’s just too true a lot of the time. I mean, we see it on here all the time Granted one can have both people and horse skills, don’t get me wrong, it is something to keep in mind whenever we clash with a fellow horse person. We’re passionate people, but passionate about horses, not people
I say most of this in jest, but there’s some truth to it.
There are a few roads one can take to get to Rome, and as long as the horse and the horse’s welfare is at the forefront, I don’t really care which road someone takes.