I miss my former hay guy. He was a lawyer (my dad’s actually) who unfortunately had to retire from his part-time farmer job and lawyer job after he had a stroke. Had the most amazing alfalfa mix hay at a great price, he’d deliver and all I had to do was help unload. My Princess Butterball loved his hay! He’d even throw in a few extra if he thought some of the bales were smaller than they should be. Our current hay guy is sadly a trucker supporter (a Canadian reference), but otherwise the hay is excellent, though Princess Butterball might beg to differ on the odd day. Fortunately my daughter is topping the 28 YO with beet pulp and alfalfa pellets so she continues to thrive.
11 Likes
Yes, because you had to go to the post to get that number you posted and it would have been just as easy for you to post a screen shot instead of sending people chasing after some imaginary post number that works strangely on this forum, that you know works strangely on this forum because it has come up with you before.
So yes, you are the one getting the label.
Any updates on the police report you claimed to have read that we all know you have never seen?
19 Likes
Could it be that CC doesn’t know how to do a screen shot?
7 Likes
I suppose that could be true. I know that @CurrentlyHorseless knows how to quote, so they could always do that if they do not have screen shot capabilities.
4 Likes
The “hope” expressed by @Sdel is that Barisone will subpoena Coth to find out “if” HH is connected with the debacle.
Why should HHs identity be subpoenaed? What has she said here that is even potentially defamatory?
She said MB made bad decisions and was dangerous as of Aug 2019.
@Sdel and others continually make references of varying degrees of specificity that HH and I are insiders. You (g) can speculate on that all you want if it amuses you. At this point, it amuses me.
But suggesting that someone could or should subpoena Coth to try to “out” our real identities is threatening.
1 Like
Clicking the chain link icon below any post will generate a link that you can copy and paste in order to direct someone to a specific post on a thread, like this:
The above quote was embedded by copying and pasting the link generated as described.
Alternatively, you can just use the quote function to capture and quote a post being referenced to make it easier for others to follow.
26 Likes
Thank you Moderator 1!
6 Likes
I know that the number on the green counter works strangely. I was not using that. I was using the specific post number you get when you click the time stamp.
I know how to screen shot. I assumed you (g) would know how to use the search function. That’s what it’s for.
And, hopefully obviously by this point, we’d like the conversation to be redirected to discussing the main topic more than each other.
37 Likes
On topic… Do people think Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) will respond to their subpoenas this time or wait for the other side to make a contempt filing again?
It does not make sense to me that a lawyer (Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya) would ignore a subpoena once, but for some reason I feel like he plans to do it again. I will be pleasantly surprised if he does the right thing and answers it.
I wonder if Jonathan Kanarek will send another private letter to the judge?
7 Likes
Phew!
When I saw the last post was by Mod1, I totally thought the thread had been locked. Lol.
7 Likes
You can also get to the url for the post by clicking on the time posted in the upper corner. That option will give you the post number, exact time/date a post was made, plus give someone the option to PM the poster or start a new thread.
6 Likes
This option does not always work for everyone.
5 Likes
I am confused. This is how your post appears to me (I’m on a PC, not a mobile device).
Where is the chain link icon you are referring to?
1 Like
Click on the three dots that appears under any post (down by where you flag or like a post). When that menu expands, you’ll see the icon that looks like two chain links.
11 Likes
Different devices and whatever platform you are on (Safari, Google Chrome, Firefox etc.) show different page counts. For instance, Sdel’s post that Hut-Ho QFPed was #5468 on my computer. So no, no projecting… no laughing and laughing needed.
What looks a bit foolish is that some of you are not understanding that post counts people may refer to may vary… for a variety of reasons, no matter who posted what.
I do not see a “threat”.
13 Likes
