Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[Rubyroo]

@Sdel

None as far as anyone knows. LK on the other hand……

Oh ok well that seems a bit strange then.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

And not because I don’t believe she was asked to leave, but because I didn’t think that Michael has had many, many, many opportunities to tell his side of the story where he would have the opportunity to tell anyone this many, many, many times.

My, yet another complete twisting of words.

[Joanne]

@Rubyroo

I guess there is - you seem upset that you don’t have proof that there were empty boxes of Suboxone is Michael’s trash. I’m just curious why.

Document everything.

[Angela_Freda]

Dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

[trubandloki]

@Rubyroo

Another thing I’ve been curious about - how many people posting here are friends with Michael? A few months ago, before Michael was transferred to where he is now, there was talk about him being released and some were talking about going to a Christmas party that he was going to host at his farm. Is he ok with his friends posting on these threads?

Oh, I can answer this…
I have never met Michael and before all this happened I did not even know he existed.

But I was probably one of the people joking about going to a Christmas party at Michael’s.

Which is not likely to happen for so many reasons. Ignoring the whole fact that Michael does not know me, and I do not know him, I am also one of those people who pretty much never travels and from what I have learned here Michael does not live in the same state as me. So no party for me even if I managed to get myself an invite.

On a more serious note, I do not think Michael knows or does not know what anyone randomly on the internet is posting about him or the situation.

@Rubyroo

I was asking about the comment that Michael himself stated many, many, many times that he asked her to leave. And not because I don’t believe she was asked to leave, but because I didn’t think that Michael has had many, many, many opportunities to tell his side of the story where he would have the opportunity to tell anyone this many, many, many times. I have no doubt that Lauren new that her presence was not welcome on that property.

It is hard to guess what you are trying to say in your twisting here, but if you bothered to watch the 48 hours episode you would see where the people here are getting that Michael said she was told many many times. He says it, himself, on camera, for all to see, in his own words. It is not a case of him telling someone he is friends with and them passing it along and it getting posted here. He said it, 48 hours put it in the episode. Just like they put in the episode Lauren’s theory on bowing to a horse and the screen shot of the safesport document where she checked yes.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

@Sdel

None as far as anyone knows. LK on the other hand……

Oh ok well that seems a bit strange then.

Why? It’s a public horse discussion board with members from all over the world participating.

[Rubyroo]

@Joanne

Document everything.

@Angela_Freda

Dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

Obviously someone directly involved in this case (for example, Michael’s lawyers) would want to collect this kind of thing, but why do random people on the internet need to gather proof of something related to this case?

[Angela_Freda]

@Rubyroo

I was asking about the comment that Michael himself stated many, many, many times that he asked her to leave. And not because I don’t believe she was asked to leave, but because I didn’t think that Michael has had many, many, many opportunities to tell his side of the story where he would have the opportunity to tell anyone this many, many, many times. I have no doubt that Lauren new that her presence was not welcome on that property

you also stated you haven’t read the various threads, watched the trial, read the YouTube comments or watched the 48Hours episode, so I bet you’d agree that juuuust maybe you missed it?

[Rubyroo]

@Sdel

Why? It’s a public horse discussion board with members from all over the world participating.

Discussing the case isn’t strange - I meant the part about being invited to Michael’s Christmas party.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

@Joanne

Document everything.

@Angela_Freda

Dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

Obviously someone directly involved in this case (for example, Michael’s lawyers) would want to collect this kind of thing, but why do random people on the internet need to gather proof of something related to this case?

It’s been shown to be a necessary habit. Otherwise the next time one turns around someone will be denying it again.

[Angela_Freda]

@Rubyroo

Obviously someone directly involved in this case (for example, Michael’s lawyers) would want to collect this kind of thing, but why do random people on the internet need to gather proof of something related to this case?

A better question, why would a boarder be taping conversations she’s not involved in at the barn she boards at?
People do all kinds of stuff that we don’t understand.
Some of it is harmless, some of it is illegal and causes harm to others.
I know which I concern myself with.

[trubandloki]

@Sdel

It’s been shown to be a necessary habit. Otherwise the next time one turns around someone will be denying it again.

So true with so many posters here.

I have found the more people scream that they do not edit, the more likely they are to edit.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

@Sdel

Why? It’s a public horse discussion board with members from all over the world participating.

Discussing the case isn’t strange - I meant the part about being invited to Michael’s Christmas party.

Sounds like you are just purposely misunderstanding sarcasm. Pretty good considering that was in a previous thread.

[Rubyroo]

@Angela_Freda

you also stated you haven’t read the various threads, watched the trial, read the YouTube comments or watched the 48Hoyrs episode, so I bet you’d agree that juuuust maybe you missed it?

Michael couldn’t have mentioned anything during the trial (he didn’t testify), he doesn’t participate in YouTube comments or these forums so he couldn’t have said it there, so the only place according to your post he could have mentioned it is in the 48Hours episode, which is what I asked. It is weird that he would say the same thing many, many, many times in one 48 Hours episode though. You’d think they would have edited out the repetition. Like I said, I am planning on watching it when I have time.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Rubyroo

@Angela_Freda

Tarshis and JK @Inigo-montoya were negotiating a place for her to go to.

If that doesn’t tell you that you should leave, while you claim to hear a plot to kill you… I mean… I guess you can deny that.
But I doubt it will end well. Or your denial will be believable.
.

I was asking about the comment that Michael himself stated many, many, many times that he asked her to leave. And not because I don’t believe she was asked to leave, but because I didn’t think that Michael has had many, many, many opportunities to tell his side of the story where he would have the opportunity to tell anyone this many, many, many times. I have no doubt that Lauren new that her presence was not welcome on that property.

In the 48 Hours episode, in an interview taped after the criminal verdict, the interviewer asked Barisone if he had asked LK to leave, and he answers, “Yes, many, many times.”

However, in the lawsuit he filed against the police, there is no claim that LK was asked to leave prior to the Aug 5 communication from Tarshis. In the criminal trial, Tarshis testified that even as late as Aug 5, MB did not want to evict LK, but intended to “scare her” out.

MB was not acting rationally in the days and weeks before the shooting.

[trubandloki]

@Sdel

Sounds like you are just purposely misunderstanding sarcasm. Pretty good considering that was in a previous thread.

Oh wait. So the person who is insisting they are not reading any other threads has actually gone back to find points in other threads to comment on?

So very interesting.

[Rubyroo]

@CurrentlyHorseless

In the 48 Hours episode, in an interview taped after the criminal verdict, the interviewer asked Barisone if he had asked LK to leave, and he answers, “Yes, many, many times.”

However, in the lawsuit he filed against the police, there is no claim that LK was asked to leave prior to the Aug 5 communication from Tarshis. In the criminal trial, Tarshis testified that even as late as Aug 5, MB did not want to evict LK, but intended to “scare her” out.

Thank you, this is a helpful response.

[Jealoushe]

@LexInVA

Revealing proof of her long-term and continuous use of narcotics, which are banned under FEI rules, would get her banned.

I know there are a few who were suspended for drug use (Lamaze is one, twice, after being named to the Olympic Team but went on to win Gold years later), after testing positive, but have not heard of a full ban over drug use outside of competition. Do you know of any examples?

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

@Sdel

Sounds like you are just purposely misunderstanding sarcasm. Pretty good considering that was in a previous thread.

Oh wait. So the person who is insisting they are not reading any other threads has actually gone back to find points in other threads to comment on?

So very interesting.

Yep. I’m pretty sure that was KM about MB’s Krol hearing results and generally addressed to IM and/or Seeker.

[Angela_Freda]

@Rubyroo

Discussing the case isn’t strange - I meant the part about being invited to Michael’s Christmas party

You mean the imaginary party that really wasn’t going to happen, and was only a bit of light “what if…” since he’s being detained? Still?
You’re really grasping here.

To be clear, like when we muse over how to spend Lottery winnings, it was just a musing on how people who wanted to, and could, might celebrate his release… in their Imagination.