Go to main profile. Click preferences, users, choose the user from the drop down menu and then choose your timeframe.
As for legal updates, the next anticipated actions are the updated response to the amended claims from Nagel and possibly new motions for if/when JK, KK, and LK refuse to again cooperate with the updated subpoenas and new deposition date. Check the title for updates before clicking into the thread.
I am thinking that not many national shows are going to pay a medical professional to be on site to manage the specimen collections. And if the tests arenāt administered by a trained/licensed medical professional, it could make it much easier to challenge the results.
Oh for gods sake, I said I havenāt gone back and read ALL the threads from the beginning (and many have pointed out they have been heavily edited anyway and therefore arenāt all that helpful), I watched some of the trial, and I havenāt watched 48 Hours. To imply that I have no right to post here is ridiculous.
If you donāt like what I post, donāt comment on it. It shouldnāt be that difficult.
The best I can come up with is this, from the amended answer. Now, the statement of damages doesnāt have to be filed with the court, just provided to the defendant. But, if itās not, we may see some filings re: that soon.
Actually I was pointing out that it was an actual criminal defense lawyer on the YT clip I posted was saying there was no evidence for having charged on RG in response to CH arguing with Kittyās CotH post to the same effect.
To the best of my knowledge, none of our CotH lawyers has said they were criminal defense lawyers.
ETA: So CHās indignant posturing is really funny. I guess it was evidence they didnāt go look at the clip.
Youāre right that I didnāt waste time listening to your YT clip.
MB was indicted by a grand jury on all the charges, correct? So your YT criminal defense lawyer is saying that the grand jury issued an indictment regarding attempted murder of RG based on āno evidenceā? I trust the grand jury system more than I trust your YT criminal defense lawyer.
A Grand Jury only sees a one sided argument from the Prosecutor alone. Then they indict or the donāt. Being indicted in no way assigns guilt. It doesnāt measure guilt. The prosecutor usually wins on the indictment unless he drops dead or something.
To clarify, Iām not implying anything about who can post, or what they can post. Iām just tired of reading it. But I do want to keep up to date on this thread, and I value others posts.
The grand jury procedure is very one-sided and there is an old saying, I believe quoted here before, probably by @ekat, āThe Grand Jury would indict a ham sandwich.ā or maybe it was a hamburgerā¦