Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[eggbutt]

@Rubyroo

@eggbutt

Oh no you didn’t!!! Show one post, just one where any of “us” have lied. It appears someone has hit one of your nerves.

You lied when you accused me of defending Lauren. Sdel lied when she said I claimed I only watched the opening statements of the trial. Knights_Mom lied when she said I accused people of hassling me. That’s just off the top of my head from the last 24 hours or so.

no, sorry. None of that is true and you know it.

Time to refresh and remove this from my view.

[Knights_Mom]

@Rubyroo

@eggbutt

Oh no you didn’t!!! Show one post, just one where any of “us” have lied. It appears someone has hit one of your nerves.

You lied when you accused me of defending Lauren. Sdel lied when she said I claimed I only watched the opening statements of the trial. Knights_Mom lied when she said I accused people of hassling me. That’s just off the top of my head from the last 24 hours or so.

Your interpretation of events won’t jive with others interpretation of events for sure.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@Rubyroo

So lots of people were telling Lauren they wanted her to leave, but the fact that they didn’t use the term “evict” in their conversations means that it was a secret that they wanted her to leave and the sheriff would be able to surprise her with a formal eviction notice. Do I have that right?

Alright, I’ll try one more time for the more willfully obtuse among us, such as @Rubyroo :

An eviction is a legal procedure, requiring an attorney, a sherrif, and a judge.

Asking/telling someone to leave is something an owner and his managers do to get someone to leave before they resort to “eviction”.

MB asked LK to leave for weeks and weeks. She didnt. SO he resorted to EVICTION at the end.

Capische?

[erinmeri]

Was wondering what the flurry of posts was about. Apparently everyone is a liar liar pants on fire and is trying to doxx people with minority opinions. Does that about sum it up? Sheesh.

(PS, I don’t believe that questioning whether someone has ties to involved parties due to their posting behavior constitutes doxxing. 99.9% sure I am correct, But the answer should be obvious to any graduate of the Google School of Law!)

[eggbutt]

@erinmeri

Was wondering what the flurry of posts was about. Apparently everyone is a liar liar pants on fire and is trying to doxx people with minority opinions. Does that about sum it up? Sheesh.

(PS, I don’t believe that questioning whether someone has ties to involved parties due to their posting behavior constitutes doxxing. 99.9% sure I am correct, But the answer should be obvious to any graduate of the Google School of Law!)

Just because I am feeling generous!

Doxing (sometimes written as Doxxing) is the act of revealing identifying information about someone online, such as their real name, home address, workplace, phone, financial, and other personal information. That information is then circulated to the public — without the victim’s permission.

No one on this thread has been doxing anyone. The EIM just don’t behave that way.

[Warmblood1]

@hut-ho78

Why are you saying “sure Jan.” So you think that is her name? Are you trying to dox her? Y’all got YD banned for doing that to someone on a private message.

I don’t even know where to begin here.

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Omgitsme

The Brady Bunch.

So how many decades ago did the Brady Bunch air? I also have trouble with these “cultural references”.

I’m in my 30s and get the reference.

@CanteringCarrot

Do some people literally come on here just to have tantrums?

I mean, you do you, but the pent up aggression is a weird flex.

This. It’s weird. I think some posters here punch their teddy bears.

@ekat, did you notice anything different with the updated document posted today? I didn’t but I’m certainly no expert.

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

ekat, did you notice anything different with the updated document posted today? I didn’t but I’m certainly no expert.

I’ve not seen anything noticeable yet. It’s for sure nothing substantive. So, now I’m looking for typos.

[Knights_Mom]

I know i wasn’t asked but adding that i didn’t read it. Maybe tomorrow. I’m not into legaling tonight.

[Warmblood1]

If you do read it let us know.

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

ekat, did you notice anything different with the updated document posted today? I didn’t but I’m certainly no expert.

Ok, it was kind of like playing Where’s Waldo, and honestly it all started to blur together, but:

Here’s the change. This change was noted in the proposed Amended filing that was approved, and then apparently got overlooked when filing last week, so now it’s in there the way it was proposed.

Vs

[Ambitious_Kate]

@Omgitsme

I was told that one farm she was asked to leave (she wasn’t even a boarder) installed security cameras after informing her she was unwelcome. Do you recall this or was I misinformed?

Why would she be at a farm in a cpacity she needed to leave, if she wasn’t even a boarder? I wonder what she did that just being in the barn was unwelcome?

[Warmblood1]

You rock. Thank you. I was thinking it was largely the same though I must admit, I’m not sure if there is significance behind that edit or if it was just for the sake of accuracy.

[Knights_Mom]

Thank you @ekat for sniffing that out!

[ekat]

I mean, I can think of one reason to claim his farm in FL as his primary residence.

But, that’s a guess on my part.

And, you’re welcome.

[ekat]

You’re welcome!

[Warmblood1]

I think this part of the document is interesting.

I know it’s not anything new to the document but I wonder what the basis is to this. Was she unlawfully there due to an expected evacuation due to the fire marshals? Is there something untrue about the fire inspector permitting their re-entry? Is there something more to the eviction process where she was not legally permitted to be there? Etc., etc.?

LK and RG were both referred to as trespassers in a 911 call as well.

[Jenerationx]

@BatCoach

YD got herself banned by her own actions.End of story.

Oh that was a glorious meltdown complete with flounce and reflounce and the final permaban.

[ekat]

It is definitely something that has caught my eye as well.

[erinmeri]

@Jenerationx

Oh that was a glorious meltdown complete with flounce and reflounce and the final permaban.

How dare you! That meltdown was caused by each and every one of us, as were all of the flounces and reflounces. We also caused the meltdowns of RND and Lala herself… and god knows who else I am missing. There is NO personal responsibility in the realm of Kanarek.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

But you were wrong - you said that I claimed I only watched the opening statements, and that is not at all what I said. You could have gone back and looked at what I said instead of just making up whatever you wanted to be true.

Fine, I’ll refresh everyone’s memory.

You admitted that the only thing you watched in its entirety is the opening statements (which were what was on day 1). You couldn’t be bothered to read any of the old threads. You hadn’t watched any of the 48 hours episode. And you didn’t watch more than bits and pieces of any of the actual testimony.

I think my statement stands. You admitted to not having the full story or to be willing to go look it up.

For the record, my whole family watched the trial beginning to end, in real time.