Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[3PonyFarm]

Thanks!

[lazaret]

I posted the details of the statute while clarifying MB’s motion to amend in the previous thread.

[eggbutt]

@3PonyFarm

Did you ever find out if he faced any repercussions for his Krol comments?

I know that the Judicial Committee met and discussed all complaints against NJ Judges since the previous committee meeting. I don’t know if anyone who sent complaints regarding Judge Taylor has received any communication from the committee regarding their complaint.

[3PonyFarm]

I hope he got at the least a good hand smacking!

Edit to add-and taken off MB’s case.

[eggbutt]

@lazaret

I posted the details of the statute while clarifying MB’s motion to amend in the previous thread.

Thank you! I must have spaced out and didn’t fully grasp what you posted at the time. Thank you for reposting it!!

[Ambitious_Kate]

@Maria

Not if the non-professional transcript was not verbatim and used as a basis to give false information. Which is why MB’s attorneys want the transcript, to determine the truth or lack thereof of KK’s typed version to compare to the actual recording.

Question - can they get it from SS?

[Angela_Freda]

@lazaret

Making a recording of a conversation you were not a part of and then sharing that with another person is a felony.

What if you record a conversation you’re not party of, and then disseminate that conversation in written form?

[eggbutt]

@3PonyFarm

I hope he got at the least a good hand smacking!

Edit to add-and taken off MB’s case.

Well, the old saying of the better devil you know versus the devil you don’t know might apply. If he isn’t removed, perhaps he can conduct himself in a more professional, unbiased manner and follow the procedures and guidelines in place in the quest for truth and justice.

Just like judges in a dressage ring, it is their domain but if the judge makes comments outside the realm of the dressage test being presented, complaints can be appropriately filed with the federation.

[3PonyFarm]

Maybe he would realize people are paying attention and not to do anything like that again.

[eggbutt]

You’d think he would have realized how he was being perceived after reading the many, many comments about his courtroom demeanor on the Law & Crime YouTube chat threads. His clerks certainly must have read the comments but they may have not felt comfortable telling him how he was perceived.

Instead he doubled down and was even more inappropriate during the Krol Hearing.

[lazaret]

it doesn’t matter. Disclosing the contents of a recording obtained in violation of the wiretapping act, either via copies or via transcripts or any of the above, to anyone who was not a party to the conversation, would be actionable.

ETA for clarity: it is illegal to disclose the contents of a recording, whether that is in paraphrase or a verbatim copy.

[hut-ho78]

Y’all really sent in complaints about Judge T after stating you believed he was vindictive? Are you trying to make him angry and take it out on MB to keep him longer or are you blowing smoke about believing he was vindictive?

Maybe you actually agree with me that Judge T is professional and fair and won’t be swayed by other’s actions.

Just strange.

[3PonyFarm]

If he read even half of the youtube comments posted about him during the trial he should have known that he was not perceived in a favorable light.

[Sdel]

@lazaret

ETA for clarity: it is illegal to disclose the contents of a recording, whether that is in paraphrase or a verbatim copy.

So, on this board @Inigo-montoya made several comments about a section of a recording involving MHG’s minor child. Would that be a breech? How specific would one need to be?

[lazaret]

If it was information that could only have been obtained by that person via that recording or a person who had knowledge of that recording, it could be claimed.

Case precedent says that posting on a blog or website is public disclosure.

ETA: my required disclosure that nothing I post is legal advice nor is any of my commentary representative of anything other than a layperson’s opinion.

[Knights_Mom]

@Angela_Freda

@lazaret

Making a recording of a conversation you were not a part of and then sharing that with another person is a felony.

What if you record a conversation you’re not party of, and then disseminate that conversation in written form?

Then it’s double the fun! In court that is.

[Sdel]

And there was at least one other that included a phrase in quotes.

[roseymare]

@Knights_Mom

Flavored coffee is an abomination to both God and country

My hubby informed me earlier today that pumpkin coffee is good with peppermint creamer…WHO IS THIS MAN AND WHO HAS STOLEN HIS TASTE BUDS???

[Knights_Mom]

@Sdel

And there was at least one other that included a phrase in quotes.

To answer IMs last captured quote:

Dear IM:

Yup!

Yes, those illegal recordings can be charged criminally if the S of L hasn’t expired and can be pursued criminally.

Love,
The Vacuumer

[Knights_Mom]

@roseymare

@Knights_Mom

Flavored coffee is an abomination to both God and country

My hubby informed me earlier today that pumpkin coffee is good with peppermint creamer…WHO IS THIS MAN AND WHO HAS STOLEN HIS TASTE BUDS???

You have to divorce him now.