In your attempt to normalize LKās actions, you insinuated that her tweets were in response to my ābashingā her out of boredom. If boredom bashing isnāt the behavior of a bully (ooooh! Alliteration!), forgive me. Iād say youāre arguing semantics.
Just want to remind everyone to say a prayer for police and court workers on Friday, the day after Thanksgiving, when the reports of violent family gatherings come flowing in.
Thank you both! I was a bit taken aback by the attempt to justify why I may have been a tweet target by saying it must have been because I was boredom bashing!
Happy gobble gobble, all! Off to procrastinate doing all the holiday prepping and cooking. Lol.
Iāve had eight people tell me my rescue mutt (A Men fo Mayham dog from the old UDBB) looks like a Duck Tolling dog. One of those people worked for a breeder. He does a bit and behaves like one, including working a shoreline and drawing ducks in to see what heās doing (dumb ducks).
All my dogs have always been the best dogs, but he really IS the BEST dog.
And I was raised with Airedales and was going to suggest either them or the Welsh terriers. Good dogs too, though Airedales can be pretty stubborn.
Sheāsa peach! I think itās hilarious that sheās watching this forum and elects to tweet about us on a platform she has set to private. But the best part is sheās tweeting at 48 hours in hopes more people will see it.
I am not on Twitter so I just do not get how it works.
If her posts there are set to private and only people like Jealoushe can see them, but no one who is not her friendā¦ why is she tagging people who can not see them? That is a very YD move, isnāt it? Tagging people who are unable to see it.
I am trying to understand the point behind tagging people who will never see that you tagged them?
Since I am not on Twitter, I was basically asking others to confirm that was how Twitter worked, that only people who are friends can see the posts, not even the people who are tagged.