MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[erinmeri]

@Aurora58

In other news, CBS is the latest to be threatened in the lawsuit game.

Can’t make this up! Let’s see how far she gets with that one.

[Knights_Mom]

@DownYonder

@ohnoO

She is now going to take on CBS and 48 Hours?

Wow, she must be a “woman of unlimited means”!

CBS has much deeper coffers than MB and SGF, and my bet is the K-Klan assumes CBS will roll over and settle just to get them out of its hair. And then they will have a nice fat bankroll to continue going after MB/SGF.

I wonder if Nagel is handling that one too?

Perhaps they are thinking they won’t need to go after MB and SGF after a big fat CBS settlement and they can fade into the sunset to escape further scrutiny.

[DownYonder]

@Knights_Mom

@eggbutt

Didn’t Lauren and Daddy tell us there would be bombshells in the 48 Hours episode? Is this the bombshell? Grifters gotta grift!

The bombshell was her suing 48 Hours!!

LO mentioned on the GFM that 48 Hours had to hold back on a lot of the story due to concerns about a lawsuit. See what good it did to try to play fair with the K-Klan? They are getting sued anyway.

I guess next the K’s will sue Bilinkas and Deininger and Silver for besmirching their reputation. And Twitter, and L&C, and YouTube, COTH, Andreas Helgstrand (and Mark Bellissimo for that matter). Maybe they will add internet service providers to the lawsuit, for providing the technology that allows the world to see what utter scumbugs that entire family and its minions are. Oh, what about makers of mobile phones, tablets, PCs, etc., etc.? Sure, why not sue Apple and Samsung and Google and Microsoft. They could even sue the FCC. Hey, how about USEF and SS? Wow, even Congress (for setting up SS). My God, the possibilities are endless!

[trubandloki]

@Knights_Mom

Perhaps they are thinking they won’t need to go after MB and SGF after a big fat CBS settlement and they can fade into the sunset to escape further scrutiny.

My guess is that it is all puffery. She thinks it makes her look like a real person of means because she can sue 48 hours for not doing what she wanted them to do. It is kind of like a dare to her - Go ahead and disagree with me, but please note I am willing to sue 48 hours so disagree with me at your own risk. I doubt an actual lawsuit was filed.

[CanteringCarrot]

Doubt it. These types can’t just fade into the sunset.

[MHM]

@eggbutt

Is Loxahatchee near Wellington?

Loxahatchee is the next town over from Wellington. Slightly less expensive property value, so lots of people buy places there and ship over to the shows in Wellington.

[ekat]

@Syrynx

That is incredible to me. They cannot even respond properly to the suit they have in motion and then decide to go after CBS??? It just boggles the mind.

This is so true. It does boggle the mind.

Meanwhile, I’m picturing another letter:

Dear CBS:

My name is Inigo Montoya. You embarrassed my daughter. Be prepared to die (and give us all your money).

I have no plans, nor does my daughter, to comply with discovery (see the suit against MB for reference). Just go ahead and hand us cash.

Sincerely,

[FitzE]

@DownYonder

CBS has much deeper coffers than MB and SGF, and my bet is the K-Klan assumes CBS will roll over and settle just to get them out of its hair. And then they will have a nice fat bankroll to continue going after MB/SGF.

If so, this is the height of stupidity. News organisations vet stuff heavily and also are loath to roll over and settle just to take the path of least resistance b/c how could they report on any news at all if they are willing to simply cave at the first sign of pushback? The only reporters who would turn tail that quickly would work for like a gossip column, not a real news organisation.

CBS has faced much more legitimate opposition in much bigger and more controversial stories than this penny ante nonsense.

They are making themselves look absolutely comical - nay, delusional - with this latest threat.

[Knights_Mom]

Yeah but makes you wonder what’s in the apparent contract between LK JK and CBS/48 Hours.

[2tempe]

It seems that people believe the USEF is “much more” than what it really is. Yet if you look up their lists of rulings and suspensions, it clear they have a very narrow focus.

1. MANY suspensions of people who owe the USEF or licensed competition money.
2. People whose horses have had positive drug testing results at a show.
3. People who personally have tested positive at a show (very rarely is testing done but just recently two people in Europe, FEI levels, got hit.
4. A few people accused of animal cruelty - at a show
5. People who Safe Sport has investigated and suspended from sport. Note that SS is almost entirely focused on activities and actions involving minors.

The USEF is not going to get itself in the middle of a bunch of craziness that goes on in the real real world, or even horse related stuff outside shows unless it results in an arrest/conviction.

[erinmeri]

@Aurora58

The tweet I posted earlier is from today and was LK’s response to the following reply to 48 hours promo tweet.

What does this tweet, posted nearly a month after the fact, even mean? They’re going to play hardball against CBS? I cannot imagine that CBS didn’t 1) have iron clad contracts with all interviewees, and 2) research and run by legal any claims that were made.

[trubandloki]

@2tempe

It seems that people believe the USEF is “much more” than what it really is. Yet if you look up their lists of rulings and suspensions, it clear they have a very narrow focus.

1. MANY suspensions of people who owe the USEF or licensed competition money.
2. People whose horses have had positive drug testing results at a show.
3. People who personally have tested positive at a show (very rarely is testing done but just recently two people in Europe, FEI levels, got hit.
4. A few people accused of animal cruelty - at a show
5. People who Safe Sport has investigated and suspended from sport. Note that SS is almost entirely focused on activities and actions involving minors.

The USEF is not going to get itself in the middle of a bunch of craziness that goes on in the real real world, or even horse related stuff outside shows unless it results in an arrest/conviction.

Then why do they bother to have a code of conduct?

[MHM]

@erinmeri

@Aurora58

The tweet I posted earlier is from today and was LK’s response to the following reply to 48 hours promo tweet.

What does this tweet, posted nearly a month after the fact, even mean? They’re going to play hardball against CBS? I cannot imagine that CBS didn’t 1) have iron clad contracts with all interviewees, and 2) research and run by legal any claims that were made.

Plus CBS probably has more than one lawyer on staff. Not one lawyer being shared between three people so far. Or maybe four if you count RG.

[MHM]

@DownYonder

Andreas Helgstrand (and Mark Bellissimo for that matter)

Wait, what did they do? Lol.

[BatCoach]

@LexInVA

After her father bought her the home in Loxahatchee, it was reported that she and the parents were seen trying to ingratiate themselves with the jet-set locals in Wellington, at some of the Equestrian events. After the 48 Hours episode aired and evidence came spilling out in discussions, she’s most likely persona-non-grata in the sport of Dressage and the Wellington community, so I think her Daddy is likely not going to get a good write-off from buying that home.

Remember when KK came on here because she was “extremely invested in the sport of dressage?” lol what a hoot.

[BatCoach]

That’s so cool that Google University issues JDs! I guess I should not be surprised since I look things up on webmd all the time, so I have my Google MD. Congrats on all your hard work paying off. A true accomplishment! /s

[Jealoushe]

@eggbutt

Well, I can’t say it is first hand info since I didn’t receive the notices. Is it public as in published online, no. Did I learn of it from very reliable sources, yes. I don’t post emphatic posts without verified knowledge. This is actually old news to most who are aware of it.

I just wanted to ask and not make any assumptions. Thanks

[2tempe]

@trubandloki

Then why do they bother to have a code of conduct?

IMO - because it sounds good, and its what they hope everyone will hold near and dear. But reading that code of contact - its primarily focused on the “team” and representing “my country”. The three rules (horseman, sportsman, citizen) are really both fuzzy and so obvious as to make one wonder…

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@FitzE

@erinmeri

Oh my. I always get a kick out of people arguing with legal professionals… but telling an actual (as I understand it) lawyer that you’re overqualified for a conversation about the law because you know how to Google (even after you have cited law incorrectly quite recently) really takes the cake.

Sweet fancy Moses, has it gone that sideways?!

Someone with no legal education or experience whatsoever just self-declared they were over qualified for this conversation?

This taking up the mantel of professional knowledge and experience one does not possess because one may have googled or is related to people who do have such education and experience is another weird and unique aspect of this situation.

I always guffawed at LK’s ‘I’m legal professionals adjacent so I can school the lawyers and law professors and other legal professionals’. It’s always super cringe when someone acts as though skills or positions held by friends or family confer special status on them.

But declaring one is ‘over qualified’ to speak on legal topics with legal professionals does, indeed, take the cake.

One of those legal professionals posted the statement “The issue of the shooting was not in dispute in the criminal trial.”

A criminal trial on attempted murder charges.

That’s what “took the cake” for me.

[SillyHorse]

@ekat

@Knights_Mom

I can say with absolute certainty that the moment court employees hear someone say they’re a sovereign citizen our eyes roll back in our heads far enough to touch our butt and we call a supervisor who is paid to deal with the certain upcoming mess.

what a perfect description. (But do you check the fringe on the flag first?)

You know, I can almost understand trying to get out of a traffic ticket that way. But this guy…I just don’t understand, which is why I couldn’t stop watching.

Question for the attorneys here (the real ones, not the overqualified one): Every single time the prosecution objects to one of his questions, he immediately says “Grounds.” I assume this is what one of his jailhouse lawyers advised him to do. Does this mean grounds for appeal? If so, how in the world will hundreds of grounds of appeal be addressed?