MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@anon6923113

@CurrentlyHorseless

Sounds like cyber stalking to me.

Really?

What we are talking about is a digital footprint associated with a person.

Employers engage in this sort of background research (combing through someone’s digital footprint) all the time. Also, for folks who have any kind of security clearances, it’s expected that your digital footprint will be examined.

Bottom line, if you don’t want people to know certain things about you, don’t set up public sites asking for funding for your honeymoon. Don’t post stuff on social media accounts that have your first and last name associated with them. Make sure all your settings for various social media accounts are private.

This is the modern world we live in. People who work in HR, or as PI’s, or for firms that carry out background investigations for security clearances or other reasons…. Well… these people are able to gather the EXACT sort of information Lex sometimes shares during COTH discussions on different topics. And they can gather that info QUICKLY. Like… within minutes.

That’s not stalking. That’s simply researching someone’s digital footprint.

Making use of certain elements of a persons digital footprint is not permitted for the purposes of employment, or for the purposes of real estate contracts, including rental contracts.

Please explain why the “digit footprint” of Lauren Kanarek’s sisters, including their preferred honeymoon destination and financing thereof, is at all pertinent to this case and this discussion.

Such “researching” of someone’s “digital footprint” is one element of cyberstalking.

This is hilarious considering LKs deep deep dig into COTH history to find @eggbutts post from many years ago to find her identity.

[jvanrens]

@anon6923113

Her discipline regarding not revealing the source of her finances in all her online chatter? It is notable in and of itself.

I do recall her writing somewhere that she worked hard when she was young so she could play later. Might have been on YouTube, but I wouldn’t swear to being there, and couldn’t remember where to start looking.

[anon6923113]

Worked hard doing… what? That’s the question.

According to everyone who knows her and RG, neither have worked at any identifiable occupations in the last 5 years. Sooooo… whatever the source of the money… it was all earned sometime between the age of approximately 20 and their late 30’s.

For the majority of this same timeframe, LK and RG have been using hard drugs. Heroin, to be specific. That’s public.

Anyone else dubious that a person with a serious heroin problem was simultaneously gainfully employed in a way that turned them into a multi-millionaire during their younger adult years? I’m dubious. I’ll admit it.

But… maybe someone can come along and say, “Oh yeah. LK has worked in the X,Y, Z industry for years, for Company A, B, C. She made it to upper level management by age 30, earned herself some great stock options, and cashed them in for millions right around age 35, and retired early. She was a professional dynamo, and financial wiz kid, regardless of the drug problem and her lack of college degree. And the heroin addiction.”

I mean… I guess it’s possible. But… I’m skeptical.

[LexInVA]

@DownYonder

@anon6923113

Maybe Daddy the wasn’t ever the actual source of the funds that LK uses to support her horse hobby. MAYBE the money comes from somewhere else

Lk has claimed (adamantly) that the money is hers. Could be an inheritance, could be a lottery win, could be a payoff from another lawsuit, or a big insurance settlement (wasn’t she in an auto accident some years back), or savings from former employment (I know some scoff at the idea that she ever “worked” but there have been statements here and there that she had been employed in the hospitality industry at one time).

And I am a bit in shock to learn that her sisters were crowdsourcing funds to pay for their honeymoons and houses. I mean - Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot? Who does that?

Per the newspaper and her own admission, she was reaching for something in her vehicle and drove the vehicle over the curbside, into someone’s shrubbery, and then collided with a medium-sized tree in someone’s yard, which resulted in her face and head getting smashed. As for former employment, there’s no indication that she ever held a job that would generate enough money to finance anything that she claims to be financing. She doesn’t have a college degree and no discernible skills or talents that would let her do anything beyond menial labor jobs and her history of drug use and continued use of opiates means she can’t pass the drug tests required for many of those jobs.

[StB.YM]

@jvanrens

I do recall her writing somewhere that she worked hard when she was young so she could play later. Might have been on YouTube, but I wouldn’t swear to being there, and couldn’t remember where to start looking.

I’ve seen this post as well.

[lazaret]

If there are no oral arguments requested then the judge will just enter a reply by that date.

I hadn’t looked at the actual activity record but I do see in the response briefs that counsel is advising they are available for oral argument on the merits.

[skydy]

Why are those words included on the docket? “Do not come to the court house” seems like a direct instruction.

[Angela_Freda]

@Warmblood1

LK also failed to report potential child abuse to the police if she were truly concerned as indicated by the false allegations (no proof existed) she filed in the SS report.

And with all those 911 call visits, she had plenty of opportunity.

[lazaret]

Seems the judge is not desiring to hear oral arguments and will enter the decision without oral argument. So they are just saying that counsel and parties do not need to be present for that as it will get entered and be sent to them directly.

The judge can request oral argument and so can counsel. In this case, they’ve presented their back and forth and the judge’s job is to evaluate this, decide what is just based on application of the law, and enter a judgement that furthers the fair continuation of proceedings.

[3PonyFarm]

So MB has been at Greystone a week now. Hopefully he is adjusting and doing well there.

[skydy]

So there isn’t going to be a “hearing” the judge will just enter his decisions, correct?

[lazaret]

Yes, in this particular case.

[Maria]

Can I have $16,000.00?

Pretty Please.

Emojis for cuteness effect

[skydy]

Thanks! That was the impression I had, but the “hearing” has been mentioned a few times.

Poor judge. I can imagine he dreads actually listening to the arguments. The plaintiffs attorneys haven’t presented any good reasons for their foot dragging.

[hut-ho78]

Insults are a logical fallacy. Don’t you have anything of substance to say? Nope? Ok.

[LexInVA]

@Maria

Can I have $16,000.00?

Pretty Please.

Emojis for cuteness effect

I got ya…

[hut-ho78]

Thanks. Last night’s reading was interesting.

[Knights_Mom]

I don’t need the full $16,000. I’ll take $1,000 for me, gladly.

[DownYonder]

@LexInVA

It’s entirely possible that her father has a shell company that “pays” LK a living income to her bank account, for which personal taxes and other things are filed by him and that could be enough to get her health insurance and the Suboxone she requires.

If they had something like - oh, K-Klan Sporthorses, for instance - as a family LLC or whatever, could they be paying her a salary for being the “rider/trainer”? If so, perhaps that is why she is trying to sue for “lost income.” I would strongly suspect though that they would not have suspended her salary when she was injured - and if that is the case, then the “lost income” claim is bogus.

[gailbyrd]

@DownYonder

@LexInVA

It’s entirely possible that her father has a shell company that “pays” LK a living income to her bank account, for which personal taxes and other things are filed by him and that could be enough to get her health insurance and the Suboxone she requires.

If they had something like - oh, K-Klan Sporthorses, for instance - as a family LLC or whatever, could they be paying her a salary for being the “rider/trainer”? If so, perhaps that is why she is trying to sue for “lost income.” I would strongly suspect though that they would not have suspended her salary when she was injured - and if that is the case, then the “lost income” claim is bogus.

Re Bold: Not and be listed as an Adult Amateur