MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

Oh Thank y… Wait a minute, who’s on the front of those bills?

5 Likes

Some guy named Donald. I’ve heard he’s a stand-up guy and a real man of the people. A salt of the earth type, ya know?

14 Likes

I find “researching” someone’s “digital footprint” by using the paid people finder services, and following them around on all SM platforms intrusive, creepy and obnoxious whether it’s LK who does it or @Sdel or @LexInVA.

I can well imagine LK would post accusing others of stalking her. That’s what it looks like to me. In this instance I’m asking how you can justify stalking not just LK, but her sisters.

Please take note.

2 Likes

Ah, good point!

1 Like

IF her dad was in fact a trader, he could have made a lot of money doing that. Like, a LOT. Not sure if he was or just at that party for them.

1 Like

Crowdsourcing funds? Like on GoFundMe? Who does that?

1 Like

:nauseated_face: :face_vomiting:

6 Likes

It could be that some folks are too obtuse to understand the difference between the two scenarios. :laughing:

15 Likes

Best wishes for a speedy recovery for your dog!!

3 Likes

That varies by state. In my state, I can hire an attorney to set up a trust, collect & deposit the winnings and no one will be the wiser about WHO won. The business that sold the ticket gets some sort of payout, but they don’t know WHO won either.

3 Likes

OK, that statement is a little too black and white for me. I think a person can report a suspicion of child abuse in good faith, and then have it turn out to be unwarranted following an investigation from child protective services.

However, I certainly don’t think that was what happened in this particular case with LK.

6 Likes

A bit off topic, but this is an interesting Podcast episode of Criminal about someone who scammed the Lotto. Kind of interesting.

1 Like

So true! Anyone here thinking LK is not a master of “research” is a fool.

These folks on their high horses who criticize others for researching, investigating, paying attention and possibly paying their own money for investigative reports on anyone they so choose seem to ignore the cyberstalking their heroine does.

The two primary antagonists on this forum might consider taking their manic defense of LK, the meaning of the verdict, their pseudo-facts about the events of 8/7, etc might have better luck on other chats, such as YT and the 48 Hours Twitter, persuading others to come to their side of logic.

23 Likes

8 at the time!

6 Likes

I don’t know that I agree. I know some extremely wealthy people that have both accepted gifts and accepted donations. We’re talking private jet, island owning wealthy. I also know wealthy people who have set up honeymoon fund type registries. In fact, I gifted one of them a couples’ massage.

2 Likes

I’ve posted a lot about cyber stalking, but I certainly haven’t denied that others in this situation do it too. I don’t condone anyone stalking someones posts every minute of every day and reporting it back to others. Watching their whereabouts, reporting back to others, posting it online, posting everything they do online, using multiple social media accounts to simply blast hate a person non stop, etc etc.

Regardless who is doing is, it’s not cool.

Not everything has to be BUT LK DID IT TOO!! We know! Why does that make it ok then? It shouldn’t.

4 Likes

Interestingly, LK stated in response to the document request that she could not provide proof of employment, as such documents were not in her possession. :woman_shrugging:

11 Likes

:rofl:

3 Likes

:rofl:

3 Likes

Sending healing thoughts to you and your puppy….

6 Likes