MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

Well, whatever they have is “incriminating” and definitely places responsibility “more than 51%” at LK’s feet. So…I guess there isn’t going to be an insurance settlement anytime soon.

What do you expect the lawyer for SGF to say, @Sdel?
“Gee, we’d really prefer not to pay millions in damages?”

[erinmeri]

Lols, I am so behind, I won’t even try to catch up. That said… there is some major legal shade being thrown in the most recent link I clicked (thanks, @ekat!) “absurd, frivolous, and bordering on obstructionist” sounds about right! Couldn’t have said it better myself.

[lazaret]

well I can’t speak for anyone in particular but any person who has ever been through 1L in law school would know that emailing a judge has only 2 possible outcomes:

1. the judge will properly share the email with all parties to the suit, in order to disclose ex parte communication

2. the judge does not do this, which makes it improper ex parte communication which can and generally does result in the judge getting tossed off the suit and everything starting over.

Presumably nobody with a law license would deliberately engage in #2 as an obstructionary tactic in a suit that their own family brought…

But I never presume.

[erinmeri]

Hey, ignored posters who insist on pushing ridiculous narratives… I am just getting caught up, but SGF has some awfully interesting things to say in their filings. So, Lauren says “send discovery requests”, and they do, and she refused? That seems to be what I am getting from this. What say you? HOW IS THAT NORMAL?

[hut-ho78]

@erinmeri

@hut-ho78

It’s this malice against the entire family that seems to taint these threads and pull them into the unhinged zone. Why do you wish ill on an entire family? It’s never been about this case or the shooting for you, it’s been personal the entire time.

Perhaps because the entire family behaves in a way that is astonishing? Have you not grasped that they didn’t respond to subpoenas and aren’t behaving normally now? Sheesh!

Yea, I see that. I have no problem with that being discussed. It is the embellishment of making up nonexistent crimes unrelated to the trial or calling for the family’s destruction, that is unnecessary and distracting from the general conversation. It inevitably crosses over the forum rules and gets the threads shut down.

[erinmeri]

Even better!

[erinmeri]

Wow. So I have not caught up, nor am I likely to… but I have seen the excellent legal filings by the attorneys involved, (and I don’t mean @Inigo-montoya or Nagel!). This seems like a guano show of epic proportions. It’s just embarrassing how badly certain parties come across.
It’s strange that certain posters here insist that the takeaway is different,

[erinmeri]

I have never made up any embellished stories about this family. So please disabuse yourself of that notion.

[erinmeri]

@hut-ho78

Yea, I see that. I have no problem with that being discussed. It is the embellishment of making up nonexistent crimes unrelated to the trial or calling for the family’s destruction, that is unnecessary and distracting from the general conversation. It inevitably crosses over the forum rules and gets the threads shut down.

Furthermore… you are equally complicit in “making up nonexistent crimes”, insofar as the court has proved. Wake up. There is also no “embellishment” required to besmirch this family. They have done that to themselves.

[jvanrens]

@hut-ho78

@jvanrens

@hut-ho78

@jvanrens

@trubandloki

@Knights_Mom

He does have a paying job. LK pays him.

Interesting thought since Lauren Kanarek has threatened to contact the IRS on others…
Do you suppose the IRS knows about RG’s income? Heck, does the IRS know about Lauren’s income?

Is giving your partner dru… err, spending money income?

Are you accusing LK or RG of a crime?

RG admitted under oath that he was still using…

Yes, but neither testified to giving each other drugs.

Reading for comprehension is still a lost art.

Please show me where I said her giving him drugs would be a source of income? Someone was giving him money that he needed to buy drugs. LK says he’s her employee, do the math or don’t.

[eggbutt]

[hut-ho78]

@jvanrens

@hut-ho78

@jvanrens

@hut-ho78

@jvanrens

@trubandloki

@Knights_Mom

He does have a paying job. LK pays him.

Interesting thought since Lauren Kanarek has threatened to contact the IRS on others…
Do you suppose the IRS knows about RG’s income? Heck, does the IRS know about Lauren’s income?

Is giving your partner dru… err, spending money income?

Are you accusing LK or RG of a crime?

RG admitted under oath that he was still using…

Yes, but neither testified to giving each other drugs.

Reading for comprehension is still a lost art.

Please show me where I said her giving him drugs would be a source of income? Someone was giving him money that he needed to buy drugs. LK says he’s her employee, do the math or don’t.

Oh. Ok. I see your logic now. Every employer, winning lottery ticket issuer, or other source of income is all complicit in a crime if someone buys drugs or uses drugs given to them by a third party.

Yeah. I think you need to run through your own logic there.

[hut-ho78]

@erinmeri

@hut-ho78

Yea, I see that. I have no problem with that being discussed. It is the embellishment of making up nonexistent crimes unrelated to the trial or calling for the family’s destruction, that is unnecessary and distracting from the general conversation. It inevitably crosses over the forum rules and gets the threads shut down.

Furthermore… you are equally complicit in “making up nonexistent crimes”, insofar as the court has proved. Wake up. There is also no “embellishment” required to besmirch this family. They have done that to themselves.

I never said you did. I commented on Eggbutt’s post. Were you not defending her?

Which lawyers do you mean, the ones that don’t get the differences in NGRI, NG, or G?

[BigMama1]

@erinmeri

Furthermore… you are equally complicit in “making up nonexistent crimes”, insofar as the court has proved. Wake up. There is also no “embellishment” required to besmirch this family. They have done that to themselves.

The conversation was so productive when nobody was responding to a couple of particular posters…

[Maria]

Don’t do it. Don’t do it. Tempting though it may be. I know, I know, itchy finger syndrome. Please don’t do it. Not worth it.

[smoofox]

@MHM

Once again, many thanks to all the legal types on the thread who are giving the rest of us a clearer picture of what is normal and not so normal about the proceedings in this case.

THIS ^ !!

Yes, thank you… it makes the guano show easier to decipher.

[erinmeri]

@hut-ho78

I never said you did. I commented on Eggbutt’s post. Were you not defending her?

Which lawyers do you mean, the ones that don’t get the differences in NGRI, NG, or G?

I was defending nobody. I think you need to take a step back. The only ones who don’t understand the verdict aren’t the lawyers, it’s you and CH.

[3PonyFarm]

I am curious what the attorney for RC strategy will be. Maybe just waiting to see what happens with the various rulings and how the case progresses.

[eggbutt]

@3PonyFarm

I am curious what the attorney for RC strategy will be. Maybe just waiting to see what happens with the various rulings and how the case progresses.

I wonder how much more RG will put up with. Seriously, what’s in this for him? He thought he was getting $50,000 from Michael but LK stopped that. All hell broke loose on August 7 and he scrambled to come up with “the story” and thankfully no forensic evidence was gathered…what a lucky break. Then the giant payday fell through when Michael refused the deal and was acquitted. The lawsuit seems to be sinking quickly. What does he have to look forward to now?

[3PonyFarm]

He came across as very bitter about all that at the trial. Why agree to the arrangement then?