When was the last time he worked? It seems like he’s just living off whatever LK is getting from JK… or the bank… or whatever.
9 Likes
Does he have a lot of other options?
7 Likes
SGF RES Nagel Schell letter.pdf (467.6 KB)
In the upper right hand corner of the page, it says that he, Silver, in admitted in NJ, NY, & PA.
2 Likes
When the poo starts flying and you’re not a source of it, lay low and look for opportunities to get yourself dismissed.
17 Likes
Wait,does RG not use passwords to get into his financial info? Or other apps where info is stored? Take this as a lesson, folks, protect your info!
8 Likes
For those of you wondering how courts deal with these kinds of shenanigans by the parties,here’s an excerpt from the Guardian about the Alex Jones trials with the results when a defendant messes around.
In both the Texas lawsuit and the one in Connecticut, judges found the company liable for damages by default after Jones failed to cooperate with court rules on sharing evidence, including failing to turn over records that might have showed whether Infowars had profited from knowingly spreading misinformation
Here’s the article that’s from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/12/alex-jones-sandy-hook-hoax-lawsuit-damages
Now imagine what it’s going to be like when the person who petitioned the court to heard the case does the same thing.
18 Likes
So the judge could say “your suit is now dismissed and we’re moving on to the countersuit?”
7 Likes
Yes, especially if LK asks for her petition to be dismissed, yes the countersuit can keep going. It’s basically it’s own suit against LK. I don’t know that the judge will dismiss without a request, because theres no need. The countersuit takes care of damages for MB if any are found.
14 Likes
Yes. There is no reason the Court will put up with shenanigans.
11 Likes
It sure doesn’t seem like the K klan wants to proceed with their suit. After years and years of telling us about all the things that would come out, it’s mind boggling that they won’t even cooperate in their own suit.
29 Likes
They were banking on the guilty plea/verdict in order to lock in liability for the civil trial and by pass all of this.
19 Likes
Don’t forget DE. All the NY lawyers I know are NY/DE.
11 Likes
Yes, because that’s where all the corporations live!
8 Likes
Because their bankruptcy laws suck majorly for the little guys….
4 Likes
And a bunch of NY/NJ lawyers do FL too.
3 Likes
Because so many neighbors continue their fence wars down in Tampa
4 Likes
Fence wars in Tampa?
1 Like
Wow!
It’s like the Nagel camp actually doesn’t understand the procedural posture of the case to date. I am honestly cringing for them. They clearly don’t have the wherewithal to be embarrassed for themselves.
When people search Nagel, this thread will come up. Hoping it saves others from this kind of slap dash, fumbling representation. What they lack in understanding and timely response, they attempt to make up for with histrionic language in their filings. Sadly, that only serves to make them look even worse.
But not even grokking the state of the case, filing arguments in opposition to their client’s own previous arguments, throwing hissy fits in filings, ignoring subpoenas, failing to understand they don’t represent JK, KK, or RG yet acting sorta kinda like they do, and on and on and on.
It’s like a clown car of nonsense. They should be professionally humiliated by what they’ve produced so far. I do note that the recent filing is at least a lot cleaner with fewer typos and internally inconsistent language so…that’s something?? 
36 Likes
Oh I bet you are at least a little bit entertained by this tiny clown car of failed legal expertise and grandiose posturing when it was members of that clowns represented parties who had the audacity to try and besmirch your own legal abilities LOL
THEY ARE THE IRONY FAMILY.
18 Likes
My favorite line from the filing:
“**Even if Mr. Kanarek were willing to produce the documents requested (a claim that Mr. **
Kanarek has not made and SGF would not believe even if he did), he could not do so at this time
because of Plaintiff’s pending motion to quash.”
24 Likes
