MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[FitzE]

@Knights_Mom

parties who had the audacity to try and besmirch your own legal abilities LOL

Oh, yes. Good times, good times.

My favourite in that series of unfortunate windbaggery was when she attempted to school a legal practitioner AND professor on what privilege is and isn’t. So very rich.

[Fiesta01]

@Sdel

So is there truth to the YT claims about this judge and Taylor?

Which YT claims are these? Thanks!

ETA: Never mind. Asked and answered.

[Fiesta01]

@ekat

She also posted that she had all of Judge T’s notes he took during the trial and they were proving to be very helpful to her, and…patience for all the readers to find out why.

How in the world, it if is true, has no one stepped in with some sort of censure for this judge? In CA, there is a Commission on Judicial Performance where you can file complaints. I’m wondering why NJ doesn’t have the same or, if they do, why no action is being taken.

Also, if LK does have Judge T.'s notes, can that be brought into the civil trial to illustrate the “lowness” to which LK will go to FTB?

[Knights_Mom]

@Fiesta01

@ekat

She also posted that she had all of Judge T’s notes he took during the trial and they were proving to be very helpful to her, and…patience for all the readers to find out why.

How in the world, it if is true, has no one stepped in with some sort of censure for this judge? In CA, there is a Commission on Judicial Performance where you can file complaints. I’m wondering why NJ doesn’t have the same or, if they do, why no action is being taken.

Also, if LK does have Judge T.'s notes, can that be brought into the civil trial to illustrate the “lowness” to which LK will go to FTB?

NJ has it and people have contacted them. Perhaps more people should contact them.

[Fiesta01]

@Sdel

Considering that JK has obviously contacted Sceusi ex-parte in this case, I assume he must have also done so in the police suit and the criminal case. The outcomes from those contacts may be fabricated, but it does seem that JK has indeed contacted these judges. And by extension it would seem he also had probably contacted AK’s board and they are the ones who put in that footnote that Judge Taylor used to justify holding Michael.

Is there nothing Mr. B can do to bring these inappropriate contacts to the appropriate authorities to get an immediate re-look at the decision to keep MB imprisoned? Yes, I know he is not in prison, but at this point, I don’t see a difference.

[Knights_Mom]

@Fiesta01

@Sdel

Considering that JK has obviously contacted Sceusi ex-parte in this case, I assume he must have also done so in the police suit and the criminal case. The outcomes from those contacts may be fabricated, but it does seem that JK has indeed contacted these judges. And by extension it would seem he also had probably contacted AK’s board and they are the ones who put in that footnote that Judge Taylor used to justify holding Michael.

Is there nothing Mr. B can do to bring these inappropriate contacts to the appropriate authorities to get an immediate re-look at the decision to keep MB imprisoned? Yes, I know he is not in prison, but at this point, I don’t see a difference.

Yes there are things that can be done. It’s a wide range of things which varies from calm complaint to a commission to a more Hiroshima type action like doing something with the media - an attention getter.

[Fiesta01]

@Einhorn

@ekat

All of this is just so very weird.

Judge S is probably sitting in chambers cursing the day they called him out of retirement.

But you know what it does do? Makes the possibility of joining jk and kk to the case as cross-defendants a real possibility.

What is the process of “joining jk and kk to the case as cross-defendants”? Is that a request by MB’s lawyers for a motion to have them added? (Sorry if my verbiage is incorrect, IANAL, and I don’t speak about things I know nothing about, unlike LK).

[Knights_Mom]

@Fiesta01

@Einhorn

@ekat

All of this is just so very weird.

Judge S is probably sitting in chambers cursing the day they called him out of retirement.

But you know what it does do? Makes the possibility of joining jk and kk to the case as cross-defendants a real possibility.

What is the process of “joining jk and kk to the case as cross-defendants”? Is that a request by MB’s lawyers for a motion to have them added? (Sorry if my verbiage is incorrect, IANAL, and I don’t speak about things I know nothing about, unlike LK).

In my state it’s called impleading - usually. There are other ways. The link explains it.

That can be done (according to jurisdiction) by motion in some places or by paying the clerks office to add additional defendants or co-defendants in other places while serving them the summons and complaint/petition.

Again, it can be state specific but all follow general outlines. But specifics can vary.

https://lawshelf.com/coursewarecontentview/adding-parties-and-claims

[Knights_Mom]

LOL Aren’t you glad you asked? BTW that’s an excellent page to explain with examples and even offers a self test at the bottom.

[Fiesta01]

Reason #994 on why I didn’t become a lawyer. I tried to follow, but got totally lost. But then my degrees are in English Lit. James Joyce is easier to read than that.
ETA: Yes, I know Joyce was Irish. He was just the author I find the most obscure.

[Knights_Mom]

Use Google translate. Take the scenarios and write them out on paper. Translate them to horse dealings if you must! If you write it out it makes more sense I swear.

If A hits B and B then hits C etc etc

[Fiesta01]

Great idea. Especially putting it into an equine setting. Thanks!

[Bogey2]

I have a friend who is a James Joyce scholar so you must be wicked smaht!

[Fiesta01]

Not really. I’m just that bad at understanding legalese that it almost makes Joyce seem comprehensible.

[trubandloki]

@lazaret

well I can’t speak for anyone in particular but any person who has ever been through 1L in law school would know that emailing a judge has only 2 possible outcomes:

1. the judge will properly share the email with all parties to the suit, in order to disclose ex parte communication
2. the judge does not do this, which makes it improper ex parte communication which can and generally does result in the judge getting tossed off the suit and everything starting over.

Presumably nobody with a law license would deliberately engage in #2 as an obstructionary tactic in a suit that their own family brought…

But I never presume.

Yes, but we are talking about someone who also ignored a subpoena until there was a contempt filing and then had the lawyer that does not represent him file something to quash said subpoena, so it is not like we are dealing with a lawyer who has shown that he follows the typical rules that everyone else attempts to follow.

[MorganSercu]

Where JK was licensed to practice was in question. KM was saying don’t assume JK isn’t registered in NJ - I don’t recall anyone questioning where Silver was licensed to practice.

Several looked him up. JK is not licensed to practice in NJ.

[eggbutt]

@Fiesta01

I’m wondering why NJ doesn’t have the same or, if they do, why no action is being taken.

They do and complaints have been filed by several as I understand.

Here is the link to file a complaint. Complete the form with specifics and mail it to the address provided if you are so inclined.
https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/acjc/acjccomplaint.html?lang=eng

[hut-ho78]

He is to work through the levels prior to release as he was proven in a court of law to have committed dangerous acts which would otherwise have been a crime except he was insane at the time. The judge is following court precedent just as he is required to do.

https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1978/77-n-j-282-0.html#:~:text=STATE%20OF%20NEW%20JERSEY%2C%20PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT%2C%20v.%20HETRA%20LEE,Argued%20February%2021%2C%201978.%20Decided%20July%2031%2C%201978.

[eggbutt]

@hut-ho78

he was proven in a court of law to have committed dangerous acts which would otherwise have been a crime

Nope, nothing was proven in court. If any criminal action had been proven he would have been found guilty by the insane jury.

[hut-ho78]

@eggbutt

We’ve known for over 3 years JK was part of the conspir

@erinmeri

@hut-ho78

Yea, I see that. I have no problem with that being discussed. It is the embellishment of making up nonexistent crimes unrelated to the trial or calling for the family’s destruction, that is unnecessary and distracting from the general conversation. It inevitably crosses over the forum rules and gets the threads shut down.

Furthermore… you are equally complicit in “making up nonexistent crimes”, insofar as the court has proved. Wake up. There is also no “embellishment” required to besmirch this family. They have done that to themselves.

Here is the initial post and my response. How much will this family have to suffer before some of you are satisfied? Is it because she had the temerity to survive being shot by MB that drives the intensity of the malice born upon her and her family? What will it take to satisfy your bloodlust and that of Eggbutt’s? Apparently the ruin of the entire family? It’s not enough they nearly lost their daughter?

hut-ho78Greenie

13h

@eggbutt

We’ve known for over 3 years JK was part of the conspiracy to Finish the Bastard. That is crystal clear. He probably provided legal advice as well, which we know now is woefully inadequate and ignorant. I hope the entire family goes down in flames with RG and Rosie too.

It’s this malice against the entire family that seems to taint these threads and pull them into the unhinged zone. Why do you wish ill on an entire family? It’s never been about this case or the shooting for you, it’s been personal the entire time.