What is truly confusing is your reluctance, no, outright refusal to admit or discuss the malice this family has brought on others.
I realize this is difficult for you but this current thread is discussing the Kanareks current fight against their own suit! They brought it and now refuse to comply with legitimate requests? Who does that?
I realize I am the target you two love to attack and that’s perfectly okay. I know I have truth on my side.
back to ignore status.
A poster just noted that I, and presumably others, have made this situation a personal issue. Of course it is personal to anyone who can see what was done to this “elegant” professional. Of course it is personal when anyone sees wrongdoing and has a desire to voice their objection to the wrongdoing and to speak truth to lies. The irony is it is quite obviously personal with these two individuals who protect, defend, deflect and attack others rather than discuss the topic of the thread - the current filings. Could it be there is no defense these posters can mount for the Kanarek refusal to respond to requests regarding their own lawsuit?
NGRI means the prosecutor met the legal burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that MB committed the acts that would otherwise have been a crime except the defense met the legal burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence that MB was insane at the time.
To the legal expert peeps - what could be expected today or tomorrow regarding responses or next steps?
I responded to your call for the destruction of the family. You take this far beyond a discussion of the court case into your personal grudge harbored from years before. This has never been about MB to you. He is just the current vehicle you use for what your now stated end goal, to ruin the family. When will their suffering be enough for you?
When they accept and are held accountable for their actions. You should expect the same rather than denying their involvement - Finish the Bastard.
Summation of what we know so far:
Lauren Kanarek is refusing to sit for a deposition in the civil case she filed, in the location she filed it at. Thru her lawyer she is claiming it is a fear of traveling because of covid that causes her to not be willing to sit for the deposition, but the rest of Lauren Kanarek’s actions since the shooting (even during the peak of covid) prove that her fear of covid seems to only apply to her deposition, and not her day to day life.
Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya), Lauren’s father, who is a “wall street lawyer” but not licensed to practice law in NJ, ignored a discovery subpoena in the case filed by his daughter, where his family is the plaintiff. He posted here (user ID @Inigo-montoya) that the subpoena was not ignored, that all the information was given but lost by the lawyers. Since he ignored the subpoena there was a contempt filing. There is no lawyer on record representing Jonathan Kanarek but strangely the lawyer representing his daughter, Lauren Kanarek, filed a motion to quash the previously ignored and now past the deadline subpoena on behalf of Jonathan Kanarek.
Now Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya has sent an email to judge (no other councils) in the civil case that his daughter filed, that he is currently not a party to, which even the most basic lawyer knows is not how things are done. Heck, most lay people know that his not how things are done.
Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1), the mother of Lauren Kanarek, wife of Jonathan Kanarek the wall street attorney, also ignored a discovery subpoena in the case that her daughter filed. The subpoena is asking for the transcripts that Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) bragged more than once on this very forum about making and sending to people/organizations. There was a contempt filing again Kirby Kanarek too. Lauren’s lawyer, who does not represent Kirby Kanarek, filed a motion, after the deadline, after the contempt filing, to quash the discovery subpoena.
The prosecuting attorney for the criminal case has asked the judge in the civil case to write an order to require him to hand over the evidence that the lawyers in the civil case are asking for.
In response to that request (and the whole mess of filings) we now have Lauren’s lawyer saying that the state should not have to provide that stuff, that the lawyers should just be asking his client, Lauren Kanarek, for things. The same client who when asked previously said (paraphrased because I am not going to go get the exact words) - go find it yourself.
Oh, and Lauren’s lawyer is also saying that it is not fair to ask for their (Lauren’s, Kirby’s, Jonathan’s, and Robert Guy Goodwin/Jim E Stark’s) phone records because the lawyers might see their shopping lists and financial information.
Honestly, this part makes me roll my eyes so hard that I fall off my chair. I guess these are the sort of illogical obstructionist tactics we can expect from a lawyer whose case is about to fall apart?
I totally agree with you!
In giving Bruce the benefit of the doubt (which might be silly of me), I wonder if he was not aware/remembering that his client had said that originally and his response was a basic response to most things - just ask us, we don’t bite, we will give you stuff eventually - wink wink wink.
Do attorneys have to re-up their registration from time to time? If an attorney is retired, does he/she need to keep activating their registration with the state? Or are they considered forever “registered and active” once they are admitted to the bar in that state? IOW, is it a “one and done” situation?
Perhaps O’Connor wrote this one but someone else wrote the previous one that was so sloppy. I had postulated on the other thread that the sloppy one may have been written by JK himself and simply forwarded to Nagel to file (and possibly to save $$$). It was/is hard to believe that an established and successful attorney like Nagel would write something so - bad.
Joyce and legalese we’re the same for me when I started law school: I understood every word on the page, the sentences just didn’t make sense.
But… Bruce was wiling to sign his name to that mess so it does not matter who actually wrote it, it is his letter.
Well, JK isn’t registered and licensed to practice in NJ as of right now and isn’t that all that matters regarding the subpoenas? That he was ever licensed to practice should mean he knows better than to contact the judge behind the scenes.
Then again, he worked for E. F. Hutton, so fraud, chicanery and shady deals may have been his bread & butter all along.
Yes, every year in the jurisdictions I’m licensened in. You also have to take continuing CLE credit every year that is relatable to your jurisdictions and some of those credits have to be in ethics. Every year I have to have 12 hours of general and 2 hours of ethics. Luckily my two jurisdictions play well together and they accept each other’s classes.
Good question. There are phone numbers listed for the judges on the website but not an email address. So JK either had obtained it from someone, or he had an email address for someone else in the court system and was able to guess the syntax for Sceusi’s email address.
Here is a screenshot of judges in the Civil Division for Morris County. Notably absent is Sceusi. I’m wondering if it is an old list and hasn’t been updated since Sceusi came back out of retirement (even though he’s been back for a couple of years now).
What I can’t seem to stop finding hi-larious, is how raucously delighted Jk and kk were to post on this forum, without restraint or guile, and with such aplomb, when all of a sudden they were asked to produce their claims they made here and suddenly clamped down tighter than a virgins knees and not a peep from them again. As if they never dreamed what they claimed online could be held up as what they…er…claimed online.
Small things.
How cute that the contact info for judges still includes a fax number for each one. Lol.
You think they still fax things?
I’m a little confused where JK being a ‘Wall St lawyer’ came from.
Didn’t IM state clearly on here something to the effect of people graduate from law school but don’t practice law all the time, they do something else. Which is, of course, true. But that would have been JK describing JK so when did that morph into his being a Wall St. lawyer? Nagel was the first one to throw that description out, right?
If JK didn’t practice law at a firm or hold a position as in-house lawyer at EF Hutton, how exactly is/was he a [insert any street] lawyer ever at all?
He also boldly and badly lied on this forum that they did respond and subsequently not-his-lawyer exposed that lie in his filing.
I mean, they even lie badly. All of them. LK was constantly being caught out in lies here and on other SM. Then JK and KK continued the ham fisted attempts at obfuscation, but they were all so transparent and easily disproven.
That is why I never could understand the unwavering ‘I believe IM b/c he’s right’ faction. The lies were just so very obvious. The lie that he wasn’t JK. The lie that the responses to the subpoenas got ‘lost in the mail’. All the lies were so very, sadly, clumsily, artlessly obvious. I’m struggling to understand anyone not being able to have seen through them from miles and miles away. Honestly struggling with that one.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
