Such frivolity is not limited to the wealthy. Consider the current proceedings in the trial of Darrell Brooks, the Wisconsin holiday parade shooter. He is acting as his own attorney and will not even let the judge get a word in, or even respond to his name. And whatever the verdict he will appeal.
Contradictory is protecting MB from LK not protecting LK from the man proven in court to have shot her twice.
Which mental health professional was right? Dr Simring or Dr Schlesinger?
We know RC got it wrong and she specialized in family counseling.
So in a conversation of who is in danger from who with “dangerousness” as described in Krol materials, what is contradictory is the shooter being protected from his victim.
With respect to SS, I believe their rule is that if a case goes to the criminal court system, the only condition on which the person is reinstated is when the defendant is found straight NG.
Nevertheless, SS appears to be considering his permanent sanction. I would not be certain his suspension will be lifted.
It would help if EVERYONE who delights in the annoying and ridiculous tit for tat nonsense, snide accusations and insults would just stop.
Discuss the case and not each other - as per the mods. Surprisingly enough, that is not the intention of these threads - despite what some posters seem to want.
It is tiresome for those of us who just want to follow the case and discuss it - with great insight from those with actual legal expertise.
I walk my dogs often in a large, historical cemetery near my house and was instantly reminded of these threads when I spotted the headstone of a person surnamed “Neener”
That’s not what you said.
You’ve said once he works the steps he will be released. Being released means he is not a danger to himself or others.
Now you’re saying he will get another shot at her. So you’re saying after being released he is unwell and tries to shoot her, which would mean he didn’t “work the steps.”
The post you were responding to even said both sides getting an order of protection.
Me!
Pick me!
< Waves hand frantically in the air like a first grader that needs to pee >
From other things (generally) that the Kanarek family has done in this situation I do believe without a doubt that the choice to buy that house was based on the Kanarek family’s desire to make life more difficult for Michael and his supporters.
You are free to believe differently, but that is what I believe.
I have no doubt that she thought he would go to jail but if he didn’t she figured she could continue to torment him. Whether he’s in jail or not, her game is the torment game. My opinion. Proven by her previous bad acts and deeds.
I’ve stated the SS policy as I remember it. However, it’s likely that SS has never dealt with a NGRI verdict before, so this is uncharted territory for them. I think it is very uncertain as to that the outcome of his current interim suspension will be.