MB hired someone to sweep the property of recording devices but none were found. Private conversations were used to harass MB via social media but again, no actual proof to the existence of recording devices hidden in the barn. MB was operating under assumption. The recordings were verified via testimony under oath with the criminal trial, hence proof of the recordings existence.
28 Likes
Silvadene cream ! !
9 Likes
I’m amazed I have to say this but there’s suspecting, there’s being pretty sure, and then there’s sworn testimony given by the very person in front of a judge in open court.
22 Likes
So hard to understand why something so simple is …well so hard for some to understand.
There was not proof that the recordings are what the recordings are until Lauren Kanarek said so under oath at the trial.
Add that no one could file anything in a case that was on hold by the courts, during the whole criminal trial.
So not rocket surgery…
21 Likes
Haven’t we heard some kind of accusation that whatever LK and others have said online wasn’t under oath as a means of discounting LK and other’s responsibility in any of this mess? It seems a certain crowd wants their cake and to eat it too.
10 Likes
Didnt Barisone have the property “swept” for recording devices? Didn’t Barisone’s attorney see conversation repeated on SM and suspect someone was recording on the property?
1 Like
Thank you!
No, thanks, I communicated with 48 Hours while the episode was in production. Unless you have super secret insider info on a sequel.
How’d that work out for you?
17 Likes
Hmmm….so, what names were people called for wanting to contact paradigm and warn them, contact SS about LK after the trial/shooting?
Seems like they apply to you too.
11 Likes
Yes, that’s already been said.
No devices turned up in the sweep = no proof.
Conversations turning up online but no proof of the recordings existence = harassment but not proof.
It wasn’t until LK testified that she admitted to placing recording devices in various locations (as well as RG) on the farm and where the devices were located that their existence was evident, hence why this is spelled out in MB’s suit. It also wasn’t until later that KK stated publicly she had accessed the devices and also transcribed them. Therefore, a subpoena for KK (and RG for that matter) is extremely relevant.
JK/IM also said the recordings would be turned over yet here we are, ignoring subpoenas. Not delivering bombshells.
27 Likes
And didn’t find any.
Therefore the “Proof” came later than August 2019. The “Proof” came at the criminal trial by a witness, from the witness stand, under oath.
Mariascratchingherhead
19 Likes
Who wants to help me write a reading and listening for comprehension book?
14 Likes
Really? Why?
12 Likes
I do not think 
can be fixed by comprehension exercises unfortunately.
12 Likes
Dang, throwing my rose colored glasses to the floor again
5 Likes
That’s a really good point.
Was LK claiming MB was plotting her “murder” via recordings directly after the incident? It’s hard to keep her delusions straight.
I remember KK mentioning the nefariousness of a shovel in MB’s truck on the forums shortly after she had stated she transcribed the recordings.
10 Likes
Really? Isn’t being given copies of the audio tapes proof that the recordings “are what the recordings are”?
1 Like
She was still ranting about it on YT after the trial…
7 Likes
But, hey, if you have Judge Sceusi’s contact info, that’d be great.
SARCASM, SARCASM, SARCASM!
1 Like
