MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@skydy

It seems that this would make Nagel’s SOL claim moot. Wouldn’t it?

… amendment is sought based upon plaintiff Lauren Kanarek’s testimony at the criminal trial in April 2022 in which she admitted, under oath, to participating in the making of audio recordings on the premises of Sweet Grass Farms, which recording were made without the knowledge or consent of any of the participants in the conversations.

But he obviously knew about the recordings long before that, as Nagel points out.

They were admitted to then, in open court, and sworn to.

So?

He clearly knew about the recordings since before the shooting.

[cutter99]

@SillyHorse

@Ambitious_Kate

Wait- is Fat_Dinah and FatDinah the same poster?

It would be an odd coincidence if they aren’t.

I have asked the moderator to clarify if they are one and the same, but have not received that clarification yet.

[Fat_Dinah]

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.
Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@skydy

It seems that this would make Nagel’s SOL claim moot. Wouldn’t it?

… amendment is sought based upon plaintiff Lauren Kanarek’s testimony at the criminal trial in April 2022 in which she admitted, under oath, to participating in the making of audio recordings on the premises of Sweet Grass Farms, which recording were made without the knowledge or consent of any of the participants in the conversations.

But he obviously knew about the recordings long before that, as Nagel points out.

They were admitted to then, in open court, and sworn to.

So?

He clearly knew about the recordings since before the shooting.

You make no sense.

[Fiesta01]

[Sdel]

@Fat_Dinah

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.
Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

But it’s not. They have the plot already. They made it clear this is about firming up the record.

[Knights_Mom]

@Fat_Dinah

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.
Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

That’s wrong thinking. Subpoenas for JK LK and RG are completely relevant due to their involvement in the events that lead up to the shooting.

EB and SW had nothing to do with the events that led up to the shooting.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@skydy

It seems that this would make Nagel’s SOL claim moot. Wouldn’t it?

… amendment is sought based upon plaintiff Lauren Kanarek’s testimony at the criminal trial in April 2022 in which she admitted, under oath, to participating in the making of audio recordings on the premises of Sweet Grass Farms, which recording were made without the knowledge or consent of any of the participants in the conversations.

But he obviously knew about the recordings long before that, as Nagel points out.

They were admitted to then, in open court, and sworn to.

So?

He clearly knew about the recordings since before the shooting.

You make no sense.

As you said yourself, the SOL starts running at the point in time when the damage occurred, or the person learned it occurred, or should have known it occurred.

Barisone knew of the allegedly damaging recordings since August 2019. That’s when the two year SOL starts.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@skydy

It seems that this would make Nagel’s SOL claim moot. Wouldn’t it?

… amendment is sought based upon plaintiff Lauren Kanarek’s testimony at the criminal trial in April 2022 in which she admitted, under oath, to participating in the making of audio recordings on the premises of Sweet Grass Farms, which recording were made without the knowledge or consent of any of the participants in the conversations.

But he obviously knew about the recordings long before that, as Nagel points out.

They were admitted to then, in open court, and sworn to.

So?

He clearly knew about the recordings since before the shooting.

You make no sense.

As you said yourself, the SOL starts running at the point in time when the damage occurred, or the person learned it occurred, or should have known it occurred.

Barisone knew of the allegedly damaging recordings since August 2019. That’s when the two year SOL starts.

Wrong. He KNEW upon testimony April 2022.

[eggbutt]

@Fat_Dinah

You could subpoena the US Postal Service for the physical locations this summer when I mailed letters to SafeSport and USEF about their investigations and to Judge Taylor’s court about the Krol hearing. That would show where I was. (LOL)
I confess. My letter to Helgstrand in Wellington, FL, was mailed from my hometown.

Any communication with Taylor is highly inappropriate. Why are you involved? Are you part of the Kanarek family providing some sort of victim’s statement?

What does Helgstrand have to do with anything or were you looking for a horse? Did Scott respond to you?

SS/USEF?

Would you like the producer contact information for CBS/48 Hours too?

Desperation and reeks of trying to influence an investigation and interfere with a judicial process.

[Fiesta01]

OMGosh, you lucky girl!! Loved that horse. Second only to Touch of Class in my affections (for jumpers, obviously, and after my own horses).

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

Wrong. He KNEW upon testimony April 2022.

Well, if he was not aware of the recordings prior to April 2022, then clearly they played no role in “tormenting him” prior to April 2022, as he claims.

[Einhorn]

@Maria

Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2(a) every action for personal injury must be brought within two years “unless otherwise provided by law”. There is no law providing otherwise, therefore, the claim
must be brough within two years."

If you have a nice clear statue to cite to, you use that and hope the other side doesn’t have a good argument that other laws apply. Pretty straightforward advocating for your client.

I think there has already been a legal brief filled supporting reading why MB can amend, now the judge can decide. The fact that there was a criminal trial in the middle will probably be weighed in favor of the request to amend, but Nagels response seems part for the course

[MHM]

@Fat_Dinah

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.

Wow.

That’s like trying to compare the situation with JK/LK/RG to the Washington Post again.

[SillyHorse]

@Fat_Dinah

Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

You wouldn’t have to if you were any good at it.

[Pocket_Rocket]

Thanks but no. The “jokes” were about as funny as a toothache.

[Omgitsme]

There’sa difference between knowing recordings exist and hearing in open court, under oath, that recordings exist.

[Sdel]

@Einhorn

I think there has already been a legal brief filled supporting reading why MB can amend, now the judge can decide. The fact that there was a criminal trial in the middle will probably be weighed in favor of the request to amend, but Nagels response seems part for the course

The law is about nuance. Seems a shame some can’t appreciate that.

[eggbutt]

@Fat_Dinah

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.
Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

Has RG received a subpoena? That’s breaking news! Thanks for that bombshell!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Omgitsme

There’sa difference between knowing recordings exist and hearing in open court, under oath, that recordings exist.

Not if you’ve already been handed the recordings themselves as part of discovery in the criminal case.