This is an interesting point. All they had to do, and they know this, is hire counsel prior to their month long vacation (using the same math they use for Lauren’s ICU stay), then this would be all handled.
Next continuance will be ‘we just got back in the country and we have not hired counsel yet’.
13 Likes
They received the subpoenas in JULY. How Long do they want? This is ridiculous.
13 Likes
I think I should send an email to the judge since that is appropriate in the world of the Kanareks and their banned supporters and ask him to wonder why delay any further since 1) this court action has been on the table since July, 2) neither traveler has recognized counsel, and 3) move on without them since it is quite apparent they are not going to comply.
13 Likes
That should be tough patooties if they’re out of the country. That means they left KNOWING there were motions and other things scheduled. It’s a further delay tactic to bring it into next year.
Thanksgiving is at that time and then going into the Jewish holidays and Christmas things just don’t happen - high holy days and all. So nothing will even start before 2023. It’s a delay tactic.
I hope the judge denies the plaintiffs request for parties motioned or subpoenaed to appear BY OTHER PARTIES.
20 Likes
Why is O’Connor filing it when they are not his clients?
11 Likes
Why does it matter where they are in the world when they are getting a Zoom hearing?
15 Likes
Hmmm…and they were conveniently out of the country when Tarshis was negotiating for LK to move…and back just in time for LK to refuse and get a lawyer hired for the eviction…
16 Likes
It must be the magic of coincidence, over and over again! /s
16 Likes
Sorry but looooool I’m just laughing at this point.
10 Likes
I mean, what else can you do? It’s obvious what the K’s are doing here. It is comical as an observer. I just feel for the other parties.
15 Likes
If you are not a party to the case you will not be engaging in ex parte communication. You might freak him out, but you won’t be doing anything sanctionable.
12 Likes
In my opinion and I would bet on it
It’s a sleazy way to get an adjournment without the Ks having to get counsel yet as they intend to use IMO the excuse of having to get counsel as a future stalling tactic.
However, the subpoenas etc were not by LKs attorney O’Connor so it looks sneaky for him to ask on behalf of parties he does not represent.
17 Likes
So, if my understanding of @lazaret earlier posts is correct…this is another red herring argument.
If Nagel and O’Connor are representing JK/KK on these motions, then JK/KK do not have to be present, just their counsel, and the hearings can move forward….it’s their problem to figure out how to watch it on zoom, they won’t be speaking anyway.
If JK/KK are representing themselves, then Nagel/O’Connors motions have no standing and can be ignored. If that is the case, then currently JK/KK have not filed opposition motions and the SGF/Barisone motions stand unopposed, so JK/KK have no argument in front of the court and so nothing they say should matter…so it shouldn’t matter if they show up or not…
20 Likes
That law firm had better watch it, they are skirting with representation of JK and KK, which could lead to a big lawsuit against THEM for breach of duty to their original client, LK.
18 Likes
I think we should all file a motion to force the hearing, lets call the law clerk! Again, more sarcasm
5 Likes
Oh look, another fun thing for Lauren to sue over!
7 Likes
Love how he gets right to the point!
Well said, very well said.
10 Likes
You tell him Mr. D!
8 Likes
