Hopefully having a watch party.
14 Likes
Thanks so much for the info! I’ll look into it. 
You and others took such good notes last time. I hope you can watch it.
5 Likes
I hope this sends a message that Judge Sceusi isn’t going to play games.
Edit to correct Judge’s name
18 Likes
Plaintiff’s attorney filed a request to adjourn this Friday’s proceeding until Nov. 24 (or something like that) because “plaintiff’s parents were out of the country.” It was another delaying tactic pure and simple, because they don’t want to have to face being found in contempt for ignoring subpoenas, or of being ordered to produce the documents, etc., asked for by Deninger and Silver for discovery.
Thank God that Sceusi showed the good sense to deny the adjournment request. Maybe it is a sign that he is already getting fed up with the K-Klan’s shenanigans.
32 Likes
I wonder what Bruce/Jonathan have up their sleeve to delay or cause issues between now and Friday? You know they will try more tricks rather than comply with the subpoenas!!
16 Likes
So sorry to hear about your mom. [[[Hugs]]]
2 Likes
I’m not sure there is much they can do. Remember, the K’s are out of the country.
6 Likes
That means the hearing on Friday will move forward.
This means that when the lawyer representing Lauren, asked the judge to postpone the hearing because Jonathan Kanarek and Kirby Kanarek are leaving the country, the judge said nope.
It is the hearing where we might learn what is on their shopping lists. Don’t you want to know what brand of peanut butter they like best?
On a more serious note, this hearing is about the subpoena’s that both Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) ignored until there was a contempt filing. Jonathan was asked for communications and Kirby was asked for the transcripts that she and her daughter, Lauren Kanarek, have bragged endlessly about Kirby making and how they are sending them all over.
The other thing on the table for discussion on Friday is if Lauren Kanarek will have to appear in person in NJ for her deposition in the case that she filed, in NJ.
There is also the prosecuting attorney from the criminal trial asking the judge to order him to hand over items subpoenaed by SGF.
Lastly I believe the judge will decide if the updated counter claim filed by Michael’s lawyer will be accepted.
I guess the judge did not take Jonathan Kanarek’s private note to heart and believes that them travelling out of the country for a month (using Kanarek ICU time math) is no reason for this hearing to be delayed until they get back.
This deserves happy hippos!
39 Likes
I’m glad the court isn’t taking these shenanigans seriously.
At this point, Lk is looking at getting hit with attorney’s fees for all three defendants if she loses. This kind of horse $+!t gets you an express pass to pay for the harm you’re causing other people. Even if her car gets dismissed, she could be on the hook for those fees.
Personally, i think the defendants should be Amending their counter suit to add the parents. Maybe that’s what they are gunning for.
27 Likes
What happens if a plaintiff’s case gets dismissed and they would have to pay the attorney fees but don’t have the funds?
1 Like
Thanks
There can be a garnishment of accounts or wages or other assets, depending on how those are set up. Her horses aren’t covered by any homesteading laws, as her home is. Also, if the parents are both joined, i think NJ has no protections for homes. So half the fla house and all of the NJ property can potentially be attached and sold to settle the debt.
25 Likes
Thank you!
Yes
Are you saying her horses can be sold to settle the judgement if she loses?
If so, remember when Kauren tried to take legal action to stop Michael from selling any horses? Couldn’t he/shouldn’t he do the same thing to prevent her from selling assets that could be attached?
13 Likes
Depending on how they are owned, yes, to my knowledge there is no exemption for livestock or other valuable personal possessions in debt collection.
Yes, MB and SFG can request the court order her to not transfered any assets until the end of the case. I wouldn’t put it past her to try to say the horses “died” to get them off the books.
9 Likes
How would it work if someone placed the horses/assets in someone else’s name?
1 Like
A warning to those with Celiac: The holiday shaped Reese’s peanut butter cups are NOT gluten-free, unlike the normal ones which are. Ask me how I know. 
4 Likes
The timing would be a significant factor.
If the asset is wholely owned by another party, and that happened before litigation began, it’s not clearly not hers.
If the transfer happens during litigation it could get looked into, but that would be very fact dependant, and she would have to show she’d gotten fair market value for the exchange, i believe.
9 Likes
