MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[ekat]

Thank you.

@eggbutt

Maybe this will work!

And thank you again! I might be able to pick something up with that.

[eggbutt]

Oh I get It! Daddy had to do what his little darling demanded—daddy, fix it NOW! Just like Veruca Salt in Willie Wonka! What a chump.

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@Knights_Mom

As a former court employee of 31+ years I will reiterate that ex parte communication is forbidden and by a non party is ludicrous. The only ex parte communication is when one party files papers that require a party stand before the judge for some immediate relief, like an order of protection or other urgent application. Then the other party is served and notified it occurred.

And usually, in that scenario, you don’t start with the judge, correct? You would file appropriately first, to get permission? In other words, you don’t just jump in with emailing the judge asking for an OOP.

No of course it all begins with filing in the vacuumers office!

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

No of course it all begins with filing in the vacuumers office!

Maybe that’s where Jonathan Kanarek/IM got confused. He forgot (again) how important the vacuumers are.

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@Knights_Mom

No of course it all begins with filing in the vacuumers office!

Maybe that’s where Jonathan Kanarek/IM got confused. He forgot (again) how important the vacuumers are.

I’m glad he did.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

So when you stated those claims, you were basing it on what you claim LK said?

I’m not interested in continuing arguing with you considering I’ve provided the screenshots multiple times over multiple threads. I’m content to rely on the other readers memory of the screenshots I’ve provided and my own good standing of credibility in the other readers eyes. Feel free to go search YT and the old threads yourself and post your own screenshots if you want to engage me on this further or think you have some proof as to the error of my statements.

[edit]

Your statements about JK communicating with the judge on MBs civil trial and with the administrators at AKC did not say “according to LK …” blah, blah, blah. Without any reference attributing it to LK as a source, or any source at all, you just make up these claims in order to smear and post them, then walk away.

[edit]

[Ambitious_Kate]

I am constantly tickled how this mug shows up beneath the LK threads. Think he is just itching to get JK to call him? Email him, I mean.

I have to say, that is one ill-fitting suit jacket.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@ekat, In that response Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya said that he and Kirby Kanarek/@Seeker1 gave the information to their lawyers (with an s on the end so more than one). Strange that no lawyer or lawyers have filed anything with the courts that they represent Jonathan Kanarek or Kirby Kanarek.

No, he did not say he gave “the information” to the lawyer. He said he turned the subpoena over to the lawyers.

[MHM]

Which of these posters is more “credible”?

Hmm. Let me think.

[Sdel]

@MHM

Which of these posters is more “credible”?

Hmm. Let me think.

The one that provides evidence of their claims?

[KurPlexed]

@hut-ho78

All 5’2” against 6’4”

I really really try not to engage with this poster and her disgusting posts but this one just pisses me off.

I don’t give a crap how tall, skinny, frail, stupid, entitled, rich, addicted, delusional,
etc etc etc LK is. Evil comes in all shapes and sizes and from all backgrounds yet you decide to take the position that he had nothing to be afraid of due to her size? That’s disgusting and you’re as bad as MCPD.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@ekat

@trubandloki

Strange that no lawyer or lawyers have filed anything with the courts that they represent Jonathan Kanarek or Kirby Kanarek.

Or, you know, answered any of the pending motions.

Well yes. Valid point.
Wouldn’t the lawyers for Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya ) and Kirby Kanarek ( @Seeker1 ) have proof that they sent something along to the other lawyers? Wouldn’t they have filed it however these lawyers do so it shows up on the website?
Are we supposed to believe that the information was lost between their lawyers and all of the other lawyers involved?

IM said his lawyer “responded”. In Bruce Nagel’s filing, it showed as an exhibit the response: it was a one sentence email to Deininger.

So yes, there is proof. And yes, it is contained as an exhibit in one of the filings.

It was an extremely minimal response. IM never said that “response” involved handing over all the requested material.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

IM said his lawyer “responded”

Bruce Nagel is not Jonathan Kanarek (IM)’s lawyer, as of yesterday still.

@CurrentlyHorseless

In Bruce Nagel’s filing, it showed as an exhibit the response: it was a one sentence email to Deininger.

Deininger did not subpoena Jonathan Kanarek (IM). Plus, that one liner that referenced nothing was the day after the subpoena deadline response for Kirby Kanarek.

@CurrentlyHorseless

So yes, there is proof. And yes, it is contained as an exhibit in one of the filings.

So no, there’s no proof.

[Ambitious_Kate]

I don’t know why I have Nick Peronace’s law suit fiasco on my mind when I review this LK case, it’s not really the same at all, but it was brought by a similarly disillusioned narcissist, so maybe that’s the similarity.

Nick bragged about bringing a law suit against a Facebook poster he had latched onto to hate, someone who had asked him some innocuous questions about his horse for sale, correct me if that wasn’t it, but she hadn’t posted anything about him. He filed a civil suit to sue her for defamation, and had the case served to someone with a similar sounding name, in some other state, which she didn’t live in. The person served had never heard of him, and answered the service, I presume, because an Attorney of record was filed for her. I think he asked for something less than the maximum allowed for small claims court. His jurisdiction has strong, publicized objections to frivolous law suits and this bozo couldn’t even get the right person at the end of his suit to file against. Oh how he bragged about going after those who speak against him, etc, and how this would show her. He had no attorney, was arrogantly filing this himself, and she responded with an attorney filing an appearance. Anyway, apparently the cout was havinng none of this, and it was dismissed by the court before the date for the hearing, and that’s my point here.

If the Ks don’t cooperate and piss off the court, could the court just dismiss their suit? And if so, it seems to me that MB and SGF etc. Would be able to go forward with their counter claim?

[hut-ho78]

@KurPlexed

@hut-ho78

All 5’2” against 6’4”

I really really try not to engage with this poster and her disgusting posts but this one just pisses me off.

I don’t give a crap how tall, skinny, frail, stupid, entitled, rich, addicted, delusional,
etc etc etc LK is. Evil comes in all shapes and sizes and from all backgrounds yet you decide to take the position that he had nothing to be afraid of due to her size? That’s disgusting and you’re as bad as MCPD.

I just wish they did have the videos so y’all can see how ludicrous this is. Oh and thank you for comparing me to the MCPD. They came immediately and saved everyone with help from RG. Yea MCPD!

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

IM said his lawyer “responded”. In Bruce Nagel’s filing, it showed as an exhibit the response: it was a one sentence email to Deininger.

JK has had no attorney file an Notice of Appearance so for court purposes and legally, JK has no attorney and therefore no response.

[eggbutt]

@Ambitious_Kate

If the Ks don’t cooperate and piss off the court, could the court just dismiss their suit? And if so, it seems to me that MB and SGF etc. Would be able to go forward with their counter claim?

And if this comes to pass, how will they force the Kanareks to respond and what happens if they don’t, again similar to current national events?

[eggbutt]

@DownYonder

@Ambitious_Kate

I am constantly tickled how this mug shows up beneath the LK threads. Think he is just itching to get JK to call him? Email him, I mean.

I have to say, that is one ill-fitting suit jacket.

Ha, I had actually started wondering if that was Currently Clueless or Heigh-Ho, but they have denied being attorneys. So assuming they are more truthful than the serial liars they so fervently defend, I guess they are not “The Bull In Your Corner.”

I wonder what state(s) he is licensed in?

[eggbutt]

@eggbutt

@DownYonder

@Ambitious_Kate

I am constantly tickled how this mug shows up beneath the LK threads. Think he is just itching to get JK to call him? Email him, I mean.

I have to say, that is one ill-fitting suit jacket.

Ha, I had actually started wondering if that was Currently Clueless or Heigh-Ho, but they have denied being attorneys. So assuming they are more truthful than the serial liars they so fervently defend, I guess they are not “The Bull In Your Corner.”

I wonder what state(s) he is licensed in?

Bingo!

[Sdel]

@eggbutt

@Ambitious_Kate

If the Ks don’t cooperate and piss off the court, could the court just dismiss their suit? And if so, it seems to me that MB and SGF etc. Would be able to go forward with their counter claim?

And if this comes to pass, how will they force the Kanareks to respond and what happens if they don’t, again similar to current national events?

I actually don’t think this is much of a problem. If LK’s suit goes away, then SGF can quietly exit the suit. That leaves MB with all the evidence in his possession from the criminal trial and LK unable to contest anything he presents because she gave up the opportunity to provide evidence.