Darn, can you imagine two different lawyers messing up the same way at the same time in the same case?
That is some really bad luck.
And then both of them were not willing to send something to the courts to say (to use your example) “HOLD UP! We did it right! Here’s Proof!”.
Even more bizarre.
This feels apropos to the moment
Is the civil judge’s name pronounced Scusi like the Italian word for excuse me?
It is most unfortunate, isn’t it?
Most for sure!
The closest we come to that is (depending on the circumstances) to make out of state servers domesticate a subpoena. We file a lot of motions to quash and file a lot under seal but you know what we don’t do? We don’t contact our judges directly! LOL
No one seemed to question anything when IM actually posted here that he was in contact with the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys and even had the gall to say one of Michael’s attorneys had said he thought he was guilty, or words to that effect. I really pushed back on that comment asking how he would know such a thing and I thought it was utter BS. He cackled. But of course it was just sm poster Inigo-montoya rather than Jonathan Kanarek. How many of you all were so fooled by this man? He strikes me as the kind of man who hangs around the Courthouse hoping to overhear something or call in a favor or two and I have the same impression about Kanarek and the MCPO. Good old boys greasing each others’ hands. Despicable.
LOL! Well done!
LOL! We avoid direct contact with judges like the plague! It’s too easy to piss them off!
This needs to stay front and center for some time! This is from @Inigo-montoya aka Jonathan Kanarek himself!
I wonder if @Seeker1, aka Kirby Kanarek, has any idea what her husband has been up to? Does Jonny represent her? If so why hasn’t he officially stated such?
We need to remember, this is THEIR LAWSUIT THEY ARE DELAYING AND REFUSING TO COOPERATE WITH!
Hey @trubandloki - got any of those reading glasses handy? I keep trying to see where that post of IM/Jonathan Kanarek explains how answering the subpoenas by emailing the judge (and not directly mentioning the subpoenas) is the proper way to do things.
Ok, now you’ve got me wondering!
Read for comprehension. She was asked to postulate. Postulate means to project possibilities.
Is that enough?
Anyone want to bet that the true crime programs are salivating over each new detail? The Ks are proving that truth is always much stranger than fiction.
And I have to add - Rules for thee and not for me just infuriates me.
Sadly, no. Still not seeing it. I even tried
Thank you anyway.
As a former court employee of 31+ years I will reiterate that ex parte communication is forbidden and by a non party is ludicrous. The only ex parte communication is when one party files papers that require a party stand before the judge for some immediate relief, like an order of protection or other urgent application. Then the other party is served and notified it occurred.
And usually, in that scenario, you don’t start with the judge, correct? You would file appropriately first, to get permission? In other words, you don’t just jump in with emailing the judge asking for an OOP.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
