MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

Summary judgement is a judgement made on the basis of statements and evidence without going to trial. In essence, a successful motion for summary judgement says that an issue at hand is essentially not litigable, it is either not in dispute or there is no basis for the claim.

To avoid summary judgement, the opposing party must enter evidence that would be permitted at trial proving that the facts are in dispute. The motion asks the court to apply the law to the undisputed facts.

Here’s an example of summary judgement: a patient dies while in the care of a team of doctors and nurses. The plaintiff sues for wrongful death and medical malpractice against the healthcare facility, doctors, and nurses. In discovery, the plaintiff does not produce testimony or documentation from anyone with recognizable expertise that one of the nurses breached a standard of care or caused harm to the deceased individual.

The nurse moves for summary judgement and is successful, because the plaintiff cannot produce evidence showing a breach of duty, required for a successful civil claim. The plaintiff cannot dispute the defendant’s stated fact that they did not cause harm to the deceased because there is nobody else to say that she did. Thus, summary judgement on the specific claim against the specific nurse.

26 Likes

A motion for summary judgement on behalf of which party?

I can see SGF seeking a summary judgement that they are excluded as a defendant, although I think it’s unlikely to be granted.

How could MB move for a summary judgement excluding him as a defendant, given that it is not disputed that she was injured by being shot and that MB was the one who shot her?

3 Likes

Thank you very much! So, since the Kanareks are refusing to cooperate with the suit they filed, SGF and Michael Barisone might win by default if the judge declares a summary judgement? I can imagine the gnashing of teeth if that happens!!!

12 Likes

He’s “only in this pickle” because he shot someone.

3 Likes

OMG! Someone is back posting the frigging obvious that someone was shot. Dang, it’s been a nice couple of weeks. Will there now be a stark reminder of her interpretation of the verdict?

Spirit, be gone!!!

45 Likes

@CurrentlyHorseless

Whatever you’ve been doing that has kept you away….please go do more of it.

53 Likes

“Ignore” feature reinstated and confirmed.

15 Likes

I literally laughed out loud.

14 Likes

It’s obvious that

  1. She was shot and injured
  2. It was MB who shot her

It’s a personal injury lawsuit. Given that points 1. and 2. are obvious, there is no way a judge would grant a summary judgement favoring MB.

Summary judgement favoring SGF? That’s conceivable. But favoring MB? Not conceivable.

2 Likes

Welcome back @CurrentlyHorseless! Nice to see your opinions have not changed. At least you are consistent!

I guess we can assume you were not off somewhere taking a course in critical thinking. Such a shame!

Yes, y’all sarcasm!

26 Likes

Didn’t you already have me on the “forever and ever” setting, @eggbutt?

Why would you need to reinstate anything?

3 Likes

Perhaps @lazaret could disclose the “critical thinking” they led her to speculate that there would be a summary judgment in the case, despite the obvious facts that the plaintiff was injured, and the injury was caused by MB shooting her.

It’s just wishful thinking. Ain’t going to happen.

3 Likes

I’m thinking that “critical thinking” is a law degree and bar exam. Would you care to provide credentials so that we can assess if we should be paying more attention to your “arguments” over an attorney’s?

ETA: Oh, and might I point out, maybe you should re-read the filings. Mr. Silver has already announced his intent to move for summary judgements after he gets the discovery/depositions from JK/LK.

28 Likes

But @CurrentlyHorseless, you claim to have no legal training and claim that you are not an attorney, as well as claiming no ties to LK or her family.

@lazaret has told us she is an attorney, and has answered a multitude of questions quite nicely for all here. She has never given us any reason to doubt her credentials.

But you know better than she???

43 Likes

Maybe CH was out of the country?

47 Likes

Hmmmm. Weren’t others supposedly out of the country as well???

Is this more of that 57D chess that most of us are too dumb to understand???

16 Likes

Why is that?

3 Likes

I can envision FatDinah egging ( :wink: ) @CurrentlyHorseless on.
I hope the moderators haven’t taken the weekend off!

1 Like

No, “critical thinking” does not consist of a law degree, or any degree.

@lazaret is providing an example of wishful thinking when she dangles the prospect of a summary judgment favoring MB. She usefully pointed out what the legal basis of a summary judgement would be. Basic logical thinking indicates that the undisputed facts in the case preclude a summary judgement favoring MB.

I point out that Mr Silver is the attorney for SGF, not for MB. I already stated that it’s conceivable that there would be a summary judgement dismissing SGF from the case. I’m just saying it’s inconceivable that there would be a summary judgement favoring MB.

1 Like

Do we really have to go through this over and over and over again? Give it a rest.

Yes, it is obvious she was shot.

With the exception of you and [Hut-Ho], it is obvious to everyone that there are multiple plausible scenarios about who shot her and under what circumstances.

39 Likes