MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[Maria]

Only lk’s attorney has responded with the motion to quash. Jk and kk awe not parties to this case. They have not made any motions to be parties to this case. They have not hired an attorney who has made a notice of appearance on their behalf in this case.

Therefore, JK and KK are NOT parties to this case.

A little louder for those in the back…

JK and KK ARE NOT PARTIES IN THIS, THE CIVIL CASE

[Sdel]

Maybe the frenzy is because the Ks have finally had a chance to pow wow with Nagel/O’Connor and they don’t like how oral arguments went….

[CanteringCarrot]

It has been made abundantly clear why CH is here, and who they are. The fact that some of you still interact with that poster while complaining about them, and their existence, baffles me. If you want it to stop, then stop. THE END.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

He could be deposed, sure. But LK, the plaintiff, who started this suit, goes first. Her testimony in the criminal trial is only relevant to impeach her. It does nothing to lay out her claims in this suit, and cannot be used as such.

I understand that the plaintiff goes first.

But if the plaintiff and her witnesses are all processed by date xxx, let’s say, can MB then be deposed? Does his mental status and psychiatric commitment affect his availability for deposition?

LK testified at the trial that MB shot her twice in the chest. That would seem relevant to “laying out her claims in the civil suit.”

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@CindyB59

The only reason self defense was not allowed is because MB has no memory. Period.

Not true.

[MHM]

@trubandloki

Why are you asking ME if and when Michael will be available?

It’s a little bit funny how somebody who constantly claims to have no inside knowledge or connections expects other people to have inside knowledge and connections.

[CindyB59]

I believe it is.

[BrownDerby]

@CanteringCarrot

It has been made abundantly clear why CH is here, and who they are. The fact that some of you still interact with that poster while complaining about them, and their existence, baffles me. If you want it to stop, then stop. THE END.

Amen! I was also going to provide a link to Hooked on Phonics but throught it too nasty.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

But if the plaintiff and her witnesses are all processed by date xxx, let’s say, can MB then be deposed? Does his mental status and psychiatric commitment affect his availability for deposition?

Yes. And No.

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK testified at the trial that MB shot her twice in the chest. That would seem relevant to “laying out her claims in the civil suit.”

I simply do not know how to make this any clearer to you. Her testimony in the criminal trial has nothing to do with this civil suit, other than to impeach her. She cannot say she’s not doing a deposition because she testified in a different trial. She can’t say she already made her claims in the criminal trial.

She brought this suit. Now she gets to prove it. The criminal trial is wholly irrelevant, unless she tells a different story under oath, and one of the defense attorneys wants to use her prior statement under oath to impeach her.

She doesn’t get to prove it by saying, go watch the criminal trial. That’s not how this works.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@CanteringCarrot

It has been made abundantly clear why CH is here, and who they are. The fact that some of you still interact with that poster while complaining about them, and their existence, baffles me. If you want it to stop, then stop. THE END.

Really? You know who I am? I seriously doubt that.

You know why I’m here? Please enlighten me.

[MHM]

@ekat

That’s not how this works.

“That’s not how it works. That’s not how any of this works” seems to be a sentiment that has been repeated many, many, many times on these threads over the years. Sadly, to no avail.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@MHM

@trubandloki

Why are you asking ME if and when Michael will be available?

It’s a little bit funny how somebody who constantly claims to have no inside knowledge or connections expects other people to have inside knowledge and connections.

I was not asking for inside knowledge.

As a non lawyer, I don’t know whether MBs psychiatric commitment and mental status could affect his availability to be deposed. I thought some of the legal professionals might know the law on this.

[Sdel]

@CanteringCarrot

It has been made abundantly clear why CH is here, and who they are. The fact that some of you still interact with that poster while complaining about them, and their existence, baffles me. If you want it to stop, then stop. THE END.

Well, they have proven to have been a great barometer for how badly the Ks have planned and lost. The more they squeal the more we can tell just how much they are about to lose.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@MHM

@trubandloki

Why are you asking ME if and when Michael will be available?

It’s a little bit funny how somebody who constantly claims to have no inside knowledge or connections expects other people to have inside knowledge and connections.

I was not asking for inside knowledge.

As a non lawyer, I don’t know whether MBs psychiatric commitment and mental status could affect his availability to be deposed. I thought some of the legal professionals might know the law on this.

You can ask Jonathan Kanarek @Inigo-montoya, maybe he can answer.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Ignoring a subpoena is holding things up. Period. It does not matter what the time line could be in your imagination. Ignoring a subpoena is holding things up. A lawyer ignoring a subpoena makes the lawyer look like a …well… no words I am allowed to post here. Let’s just go with with a very poor example of a lawyer, let alone how bad of an example of someone on their side of a civil case that they filed.

If Lauren’s case is a slam dunk she should want to move forward, not delay.

Then answer my question as to whether MB would or would not be available to be deposed within, say, two weeks of LK and her witnesses completing their depositions and subpoenas.

The Kanareks did not respond to their subpoenas in a timely manner, but have responded at this point with motions to quash. The delay at this point is with the judge. LK did not refuse to appear for deposition, she requested the deposition be conducted remotely. The delay at this point is with the judge.

Suppose Michael Barisone was available to be deposed today. What would your gripe be then? Again, as has been stated several times here, it is Lauren’s duty to be deposed first. End of story. The longer she delays the more she stands a chance of losing her case.

As far as viable alternate theories, OMG, are you serious? I’ve posted at a minimum of 4 possible scenarios as have others. It is YOU who refuses to accept anything other than what you’ve been fed by two liars. Dear God, enough with the criminal trial. I intend to flag every future tired post of yours rehashing the criminal trial. No one cares what you think about the criminal trial. It was over last April!

[cheval_convert]

Buttered Rum and Hot Toddy are 2 different drinks. https://cookieandkate.com/classic-hot-toddy-recipe/

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

But if the plaintiff and her witnesses are all processed by date xxx, let’s say, can MB then be deposed? Does his mental status and psychiatric commitment affect his availability for deposition?

Yes. And No.

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK testified at the trial that MB shot her twice in the chest. That would seem relevant to “laying out her claims in the civil suit.”

I simply do not know how to make this any clearer to you. Her testimony in the criminal trial has nothing to do with this civil suit, other than to impeach her. She cannot say she’s not doing a deposition because she testified in a different trial. She can’t say she already made her claims in the criminal trial.

She brought this suit. Now she gets to prove it. The criminal trial is wholly irrelevant, unless she tells a different story under oath, and one of the defense attorneys wants to use her prior statement under oath to impeach her.

She doesn’t get to prove it by saying, go watch the criminal trial. That’s not how this works.

Thank you for answering the question on whether MBs availability to be deposed is affected by his psychiatric commitment.

I never said that LKs having testified in the criminal trial meant she didn’t need to be deposed. I’m just pointing out that there are a lot of under oath statements by her already on the record.

She is not refusing to be deposed, but has expressed her preference for having the deposition being done remotely. The judge can make his determination on the issue in his own good time.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I never said that LKs having testified in the criminal trial meant she didn’t need to be deposed. I’m just pointing out that there are a lot of under oath statements by her already on the record.

Not in this case. She doesn’t get to bring a lawsuit and not give a deposition. Her previous other under oath statements only matter for impeachment.

The defendants have a right to know what story she’s going to tell under oath IN THIS CASE. Everything else is irrelevant, unless her stories change and the prior statements can be used to be impeached.

@CurrentlyHorseless

She is not refusing to be deposed, but has expressed her preference for having the deposition being done remotely. The judge can make his determination on the issue in his own good time.

Her deposition would have been over a month ago if she had followed the standard rules of civil procedure and appeared for a deposition in the venue she picked on October 10th.

Maybe the judge will feel generous.

[eggbutt]

Another Eggbuttism for this tiresome day:

[MHM]

@ekat

Everything else is irrelevant, unless her stories change and the prior statements can be used to be impeached.

Gee, what are the odds?