You have the testimony of two known impeached liars. Period. End of story. Only a fool believes consistent liars… proven over and over. Who does that?
By the way, let me add something regarding Lauren and her crew finding evidence of my identity…never, not once have I deliberately lied, misled or made anything up and presented as fact on these threads. Not once!
Fair enough.
I think I understand what would be required for the judge to render a summary judgement in favor of MB, despite not being a lawyer, and I think it is vanishingly unlikely that he will do so, given the evidence on record that MB shot and injured LK.
You made a vague statement that that the judge might dismiss the case or make a summary judgement, as I recall, but as I now understand it you don’t wish to make a prediction on whether the judge will or won’t issue a summary judgement favoring MB.
Please do. I though of a new angle based on the requests from JK to the Lundbergs….
None of that exists on the record IN THIS CASE, yet.
Give me a few. Will add them to the original post for future reference.
It’s plausible that some people struggle with reading comprehension, and can’t plausibly understand the substance of the pleadings, or can’t plausibly grasp why all the plausible scenarios presented are plausible. 
Ooooohhh! I wish we had Trader Joe’s in Canada!
There is plenty of evidence beyond the testimony of LK and RG.
There is the 911 call, the ear witness testimony, the shell casings, the fact that LK was shot and bleeding, the testimony of the officers at the scene, the testimony on the chain of possession of the gun, etc, etc.
The prosecutor had the burden of proving his case, and he proved it successfully based on the evidence and testimony.
Too bad he’s not trying the current case the rest of us are discussing.
And none of that is in evidence in THIS case. Yet.
And the chain of possession of the gun has a giant missing link between the time Ruth gave it to Michael to put on the safe, and the time officers recovered it from the crime scene. Absolutely no evidence showing who removed it from the safe, when, and how / when it ended up at the house where LK / RG were squatting. It’s plausible that it did not happen the way (contradictory ways, actually) LK and RG claim it did.
Well, something inspired the current frenzy. It will be interesting to see if this is a presage of some development next week.
The civil case and the criminal case are different cases. Obvs. Duh.
I’m assuming that the civil case will rely much of the same evidence that was used in the criminal case. That’s why the evidence used in the criminal case is relevant to a discussion of the civil case.
One should never assume.
Oh that and soooooooooo much more will be admitted as evidence in the civil trail. Sooooooooo much more.
I added the original motions for contempt and the motion to compel to the original post.
Ask and you shall receive:
Pina Colada Truffles
12 oz packaage of milk chocolate chips
1/2 C heavy whipping cream
2 Tbs butter
4 Tbs coconut rum
1/2 C shredded coconut
1/2 C chopped dried pineapple (I buy the dried pineapple and have to chop it into smaller pieces. Keeping the knife blade oiled makes thi job easier.)
Melt the chocolate in a the top of a double boiler. Warm the cream in a separate pan and add the butter until butter melts. Slowly add the butter/cream mixture to the melted chocolate, stirring constantly. Add the coconut rum, coconut, and pineapple to the melted chocolate and mix thoroughly. Put the mixture into the refrigerator to chill. (I usually let it sit overnight.)
When you are ready to make the truffles, use a melon baller to scoop out a ball. Quickly roll it in your hands to form a round ball. Put truffles in refrigerator firm up. After you have made and chilled all the truffles, you can either roll them in coconut or dip them in white, milk, or semi-sweet chocolate. Sprinkle a little coconut on top for decoration.
It seems that these may go well with the Coquitos drink. But what do I know, I’m just an amatuer chocolatier.
And please note, this is my own recipe, whereas all my others are taken from cook books, magazines and newspapers.
No, he can be deposed even in the facility, it happens all the time. If he is delusional, it may not garner much for the plaintiff or it could be a treasure trove of info, it’s their call as to how they would present/frame or otherwise use the information they learn at deposition.
By delaying her deposition, LK is actually hurting her case quite a lot, in a lot of ways, not the least of which is with the judge.
Nope! That is not what I am going with at all.
Is it plausible you are playing coy with the post here?
The bleakest of houses
Yep. Although the K house might be getting pretty bleak about now, also.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
