I have life experience commensurate with my age. I’m not clear how one would live life without acquiring pretty much the normal amount of “life experience” along the way.
I generally don’t disclose a lot about my personal life on Internet forums. You find that strange?
She was shot twice by MB and nearly died. She flat lined at least twice. No matter how anyone tries to portray it, the severity of her injuries cannot be nullified.
No he didn’t. He said he did not remember anything from when CPS showed up, which was before he went to the office and could have seen the gun was missing. That has been a consistent statement that has been made more than once. And yes, he did lock it in the safe several days before.
And in the intervening time LK recorded the conversation between RC and MB (so she knew the gun was on the property and where it was located.), made several attempts to enter the barn/club room /office at night (at least once while RC and the other barn residence were asleep and resulted in one 911 call), posted a lot of FB messages about guns (and since she was posting everyone else’s private conversations she probably posted something that was said between RC and MB about the gun) and then had everyone evicted to sleep outside the barn while unbeknownst to them she was still roaming around on the property with easy access to to office.
And then the big question mark about what was said to trigger SS to send CPS out for neglect and want to speak to RC.
Really, the only thing left to prove is that LK could actually get inside the safe. I expect that will come at some point.
I will venture to say that it is vanishingly rare for a divorcing couple, regardless of how amicably they are parting, for both to be completely happy with the financial agreement.
Absolutely. And I think its totally wrong to make any inferences, or cast any aspersions on MB’s character, as it relates to his phrasing in that text.
This is typical when they have nothing else to say.
By several accounts, he did do this; by other accounts, he was threatened with litigation if he did not comply.
Either way, in April of 2019, there was clearly some discussion that LK felt the need to react to, because that is when all this nonsense began.
I think she sounds very sensible and clear headed. It’s refreshing.
Nobody else was going to do it.
Not even Shelly Nelly Belly? What a slacker. No wonder she hasn’t been invited to visit LK’s home in FL.
Then maybe leave some things to those with more wisdom.
You disclose more than you realize.
When all the evidence not allowed in the criminal trial is introduced in the civil trial, I suspect the jurors - just like the vast majority of people - will find that the preponderance of the evidence does not prove MB removed the gun from the safe, brought it to the house, and intentionally fired it at LK.
Plus the jury will hear all the ways LKs own actions and decisions led to her being shot, and how her actions and decisions ruined a man’s life, destroyed his career and income, and robbed him of his mental health.
It’s going to be very very interesting indeed
Of course you do. Wouldn’t expect anything less. Will you be repeating your opinion on this over and over and over too? That will be fun!
Make these every year. They’re easy and so good! They can sit in a decorative holiday tin for a week or more so that some of the alcohol evaporates. Or not. 
Also have made the rum cake from @KurPlexed. It ships really well inside a decorative tin. In fact, I’ve been told by recipients that when they open up the tin the alcohol fumes about knock them over. Now that’s a good cake!
Lol. I have to laugh bc I know that’s true!! It smells and tastes amazing.
I guess it’s safe to assume the term “victim blaming” is going to be bandied about by LK’s lawyers in the civil trial. That is, if she ever decides to participate in it lol
I feel like we’re in the movie Groundhog Day
But everyone, including MB, must have realized long before them she was nowhere near the wealthy client she claimed to be. The fact she thought her bargain basement discount price of $5,000/month made her MB’s primary source of client revenue shows she had absolutely no clue what’s involved at that level of the sport, or what kind of money wealthy amateurs actually spend. And IIRC he was trying to do her a favour by cutting a deal and bartering board for RG’s work because LK couldn’t otherwise afford to train with him. So obviously he wasn’t looking at her as a potential cash cow and certainly wouldn’t believe she had “unlimited means.”
I believe someone here testified that her previous equestrian background was rinky dink, low level h/j stuff in NC so she may have thought $5000/month was big league money. How disappointing when she realized not only did it not make her the star of the barn; it actually put her at the bottom of the totem pole. Sort of like a working student, without the work part.
In almost every divorce where I know both parties, neither of them walked away feeling the division of assets was fair. Everyone feels like they were entitled to more and their ex was entitled to less. Why should MB’s divorce be any different? Perhaps he did feel he got “clipped.” So what? It made no difference in the criminal trial and makes even less difference to the civil trial.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
