MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

On another note; does anyone remember me writing anything errrrrrr ummmmmm questionable? Just curious, as I have had a note saying one of my posts was flagged and removed. I don’t remember writing anything bad enough to be removed.

mariascratchingherheadaboutsomanythingsthismorning

10 Likes

I haven’t been paying attention, but there isn’t exactly consistency re what gets removed. So I wouldn’t put too much thought into it. As to who flagged it, I wouldn’t put thought into that at all :rofl:

I mean, if you’re not told why it was removed, it must not be sooo important or “bad” :woman_shrugging:t3:

9 Likes

It could have just been removed as part of a chain where an earlier post was flagged and removed.

9 Likes

Sometimes posts are removed because they quote the questionable material or discusses it in some way.

6 Likes

No, I don’t remember JK saying in the 48 Hours interview that LK was jealous of MHG.

The interviewer stated as background that MB had two women competing for his time and attention, LK and MHG.

He was without doubt a gifted rider and instructor. If MHG begrudged the time he was devoting to teaching LK, that was stress that MHG was putting on him. Has anyone claimed LK was trying to prevent him from coaching MHG?

1 Like

When you get that note, there’s usually a link you can click on to see the removed post.

3 Likes

Goodness, they’ve brought in the entire deflect team!

I hope Ignore works correctly today!

12 Likes

Sounds like it isn’t if you are seeing people you have ignore posting?

5 Likes

Best response I’ve seen this morning! :laughing:

9 Likes

Who is “the entire deflect team”, @eggbutt?

It would appear ignore is not working for you today. And you just renewed the ignore orders yesterday!

Perhaps it’s time to use old fashioned iron will.

1 Like

There is typically a line in the notification PM that you can click that will show you the post that was removed.

Most likely your post was removed because the post you were replying to was removed.

I had a lot of posts removed last night that were in response to the poster who kept asking the same question over and over and over again and admitted they only wanted people to post stuff so they could tell them they are wrong.

That is likely what happened to you too.

Up thread, in this very thread, I posted a link to a thread in the technical help section about how the ignore feature has lots of glitches and does not always work right.

13 Likes

Don’t forget though that the prosecutor F. Lee Balingstring LOST his case!!

6 Likes

For those who aren’t aware, the @tag makes sure the post pops up as viewable to the person attempting to ignore. It’s a purposeful attempt to push buttons and get into someone’s face if one is aware that they are placed on ignore by a user.

27 Likes

No. But the 48 Hours presenter stated it as fact after interviewing him, and apparently is not worried about getting sued for libel.

1 Like

Oh, I thought Lauren was threatening to sue them… which I realize is the other side of the coin doing the suing, but … maybe that supports the thought that 48 hours did not get all the details 100% correct.

9 Likes

Thank you.

Now I know which post and an idea of why and who. LOLOLOLOLOL

9 Likes

We know that MB was told everyone had left the house. Even if they were “probably “ seen at the barn(assumption on your part), they plausibly drove in from wherever they spent the night. No one but the FM knew they stayed in MBs house that night. He had every right to check his empty house to assess what repairs needed to be made.

16 Likes

Did not know that!

Is that true?

I thought that the ignore function suppressed all notifications, including tagging and quoting, from the person on ignore (if it is working properly).

I thought tagging only sent a notification to posters not on ignore.

It’s not much of an ignore feature if tag notifications come through (even if it is working properly).

You make a very good point.

It was the responsible thing to do, actually, to go to the house and assess the amount necessary to meet the requirements of the fire marshal.

12 Likes