RG could have already been deposed, or have a depo scheduled. He may be complying with the subpoena, in which case there wouldn’t be any motions filed with regard to his depo.
JK and KK could be trying to drag it out and make things more difficult. They could also just be ignoring it - thinking if they don’t answer, it will go away. It sounds dumb but people do that. And sometimes, if a witness is not important enough, it does work. Being deposed is not fun for anyone, let alone if its by someone that - in your mind, you think tried to kill your daughter - so I’m not entirely surprised they aren’t compliant. I am curious if its their idea, if they have retained counsel, or if LK’s attorney would represent them for their depos (permitted in NY, no idea about other states).
LK’s attorney is asking for more time before the court issues its rulings. They are asking to wait until Sept 23rd and stating that all parties agree to this request.
I actually read every post. It sounds like the latest developments will ensure that this court case is going to be as interesting and revelatory as we initially thought it would be.
There was a rumor, I repeat RUMOR way back in 2019 that when the bestie drove straight to NJ after the shooting to be by her bestie’s side in her time of need, she was given something tangible to bring home with her for safekeeping. It was implied at the time that she had been given a recording or recordings by someone obviously not LK. This is why it was so shocking at the time to read the postings of LK and her bestie regarding hearing the recording.
Yes she can be called as a witness. I’m no expert as to testimony admittance as I imagine it all depends on specific language as to the questions. In this I defer to the attorneys.
IMO, if the recordings proved that MB had criminal intent and indeed plotted a murder via these recordings, I think they would have been admitted into the criminal trial…
If they were damning to MB and the civil trial, I think they would have been delivered on a silver platter…
However, seems more likely that everything said about the recordings by LK have just been another pathological lie.
Remember that this case was filed before the criminal case went to trial. So while the civil and criminal cases could have different outcomes for various reasons (different burdens of proof, different charges/causes of action) I would be surprised if the result of the criminal case didn’t affect their confidence as they continue through the civil case. In a normal context, it would probably incentivize settlement. But I doubt that would happen here.