He may be doing this very reluctantly, especially at this point. However, no lawyer with even a modicum of professional standards and pride would have let that document go out their door. Not responsive, not well-argued, no supporting evidence at all, inaccuracies as to background facts, and filled with typos and grammatical errors. And, no, pointing those out doesn’t make someone a ‘grammar nazi’. This is a written-word based profession and our written work product, like a book or newspaper article, will and should be scrutinized on all levels. If you cannot catch a typo, how is your client supposed to feel comfortable that you can catch all legal issues? Details matter. And, as SGF’s filing clearly shows, that logic held true: their writing was bad, sloppy, inadequate and, lo and behold, look, their legal reasoning and supporting evidence was also wholly lacking. Nagel did himself a huge disfavour allowing that document to be out there in the court system available for all to see.
As far as LK’s word salad attempt to mock myself and vxf111, I believe her top 5 global blue chip law firm that she claims to have on speed dial is for her anticipated suit against the USEF and SS if/when things don’t go her way there. Yes, it’s a disgusting waste of time and resources for an entity that is meant to be protecting children from sexual exploitation, but that wouldn’t bother someone like the KKlan.
Finally, I believe someone posted that her sister married someone she was involved into recruiting into a firm that she works/worked for as part of HR (the recruiting department). That firm is a perfectly fine, respectable firm. It is not even close to US top 5 let alone global top 5. That is not a knock on the firm - it’s a perfectly respectable firm. It’s just not as prestigious as top 5 in the global rankings.
