MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

The thing I worry about for all 3 defendants at this point is their costs. If all of the money directly tied to LK is protected by a spendthrift trust… and if JK or KK are never actual parties to these suits… even if the defendants prevail, they might never be able to recoup their legal fees, much less any judgement against LK.

6 Likes

Oh that’s just one of multiple posts.

10 Likes

True. I doubt she wants one. But… I wonder if JK and KK want one at this point. I’m sure they would never admit it… but if the whole case got dismissed in the next month, before any discovery got too far… I wouldn’t be surprised if they breathed a sigh of relief.

5 Likes

Well, one day she may inherit something outside of a trust, or sell that house and plunk the money into something garnishable, or something.

12 Likes

I guess it depends on that discovery. I wonder if they “discover” kk and jk had a bigger part to play in it all, then could they bring suit against them?. Does the statute of limitations start when they perpetrated the con, or when it was discovered?

8 Likes

Oh my gosh, that is brilliant!!! That must be it!

5 Likes

One would hope anyway!

1 Like

I’ve wondered about this as well. The primary pathway I see for any of the three defendants to have any chance of recouping their legal fees spent defending themselves is if they can find a way to bring in JK or KK in a counterclaim, or an independent suit.

Also… JK and KK are NJ residents. Their NJ house isn’t protected by a homestead exemption, the way LK’s in Florida is. So there’s that…

6 Likes

Exacatically. How liable are they?

4 Likes

Yes - when their psyche develops around the concept that they are “the chosen one,” they will go through life believing they are in fact “the chosen one.” And it is inconceivable to them that others don’t recognize and pay homage to their “specialness.” :roll_eyes:

4 Likes

Here in my neck of the woods, if discovery led you there, you’d add them on to the original suit if it’s still proceeding. Also, the statute of limitations here carves out language re: discovery of the tort.

I have no idea about NJ though.

7 Likes

But this ^ paved the way for…

If she’s had any kind of substance abuse counseling, if they have, they know enabling will Bite you in the end.

3 Likes

His antique cars…

2 Likes

On Daily Record, there is a new article on why insanity defences are so rare in Nj but you have to be a subscriber to read it.
Is anyone here a subscriber that could read it and pass along what it says? I thought maybe it would have info about Krol hearings. Thanks

Ahhhhhh. Very interesting. Thank you for explaining this.

So would they be added on to MB’s counterclaims? That seems like it might be straightforward.

But what about SGF and RC? Have they even tried to allege a counterclaim? I can’t recollect. If not, how might they go after JK or KK for any liability?

2 Likes

Yes. I believe I remember they do have a counterclaim.

2 Likes

Assuming LKs funds are in a trust, would that keep them safe/preserved should she lose? I have to wonder how she is paying her attorneys.

Does anyone have screenshots of her bragging about her unlimited funds?

Not to mention the costs of enforcing the subpoenas…

4 Likes

And horses. She made a big deal about some of those being sold too.

7 Likes

Michael is the only one with a counterclaim.

SGF and RC can ask for fees in their defense but honestly I don’t have a clue how they could go after Jonathan and Kirby. But, I’m not privy to all their discovery either.

5 Likes