The thing I worry about for all 3 defendants at this point is their costs. If all of the money directly tied to LK is protected by a spendthrift trust… and if JK or KK are never actual parties to these suits… even if the defendants prevail, they might never be able to recoup their legal fees, much less any judgement against LK.
True. I doubt she wants one. But… I wonder if JK and KK want one at this point. I’m sure they would never admit it… but if the whole case got dismissed in the next month, before any discovery got too far… I wouldn’t be surprised if they breathed a sigh of relief.
I guess it depends on that discovery. I wonder if they “discover” kk and jk had a bigger part to play in it all, then could they bring suit against them?. Does the statute of limitations start when they perpetrated the con, or when it was discovered?
I’ve wondered about this as well. The primary pathway I see for any of the three defendants to have any chance of recouping their legal fees spent defending themselves is if they can find a way to bring in JK or KK in a counterclaim, or an independent suit.
Also… JK and KK are NJ residents. Their NJ house isn’t protected by a homestead exemption, the way LK’s in Florida is. So there’s that…
Yes - when their psyche develops around the concept that they are “the chosen one,” they will go through life believing they are in fact “the chosen one.” And it is inconceivable to them that others don’t recognize and pay homage to their “specialness.”
Here in my neck of the woods, if discovery led you there, you’d add them on to the original suit if it’s still proceeding. Also, the statute of limitations here carves out language re: discovery of the tort.
On Daily Record, there is a new article on why insanity defences are so rare in Nj but you have to be a subscriber to read it.
Is anyone here a subscriber that could read it and pass along what it says? I thought maybe it would have info about Krol hearings. Thanks
Ahhhhhh. Very interesting. Thank you for explaining this.
So would they be added on to MB’s counterclaims? That seems like it might be straightforward.
But what about SGF and RC? Have they even tried to allege a counterclaim? I can’t recollect. If not, how might they go after JK or KK for any liability?
SGF and RC can ask for fees in their defense but honestly I don’t have a clue how they could go after Jonathan and Kirby. But, I’m not privy to all their discovery either.