MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[RHdobes563]

@FitzE

@BigMama1

I don’t care how she got addicted - being an addict is one thing I won’t judge her for. Being a garbage human being who has a long history of treating others like crap, on the other hand, is definitely judge-worthy and can’t be blamed on her addiction.

Agreed 100%.

But I don’t think we are typical and I think the people seated on the jury are absolutely likely to judge her. So she picks the story that will cause them to judge her the least. When she testified that she ‘tried herion once’ - I think that will be shocking to a lot of people and they will definitely judge her and RG (who admitted to using while at Hawthorn Hill).

ETA: my discussion of the addiction back story speaks to lying, not to addiction. I don’t believe her back story. I believe it was engineered as the most palatable back story a la the scene from Philadelphia described by @MorganSercu above.

It’s interesting how we(g) hear things. When I read the bolded, I hear ‘a period of time.’ Like I owned an OTTB gelding “once.” That “once” was thirteen years.

[BrownDerby]

@CurrentlyHorseless

You drafted into your boarding contract that if someone is booted in, say, the middle of Aug for “cause”, they owe not only all of August’s board but also September’s? I don’t believe it.

Yes, this can be done in barns with first and last months’ payments in their contracts. Often appears in contracts for layup and in particular, retirement farms, where abandonments sometimes occur.

[eggbutt]

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

Of course if one lawyer can subpoena Coth for user identities, the other lawyers can, too.

Hmmm. Someone is trying to intimidate us into shutting up…

Whatever (thanks, @trubandloki)!

Threats? Do we have threats? I’m to lazy and unconcerned to look at the hidden post. NO ONE ON THIS FORUM NOT CONNECTED TO THE KANAREKS HAS POSTED ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE A CHARGABLE OFFENSE. ASK ME HOW I KNOW! All caps for attention before “someone” accuses me of being

[Jealoushe]

@BrownDerby

Yes, this can be done in barns with first and last months’ payments in their contracts. Often appears in contracts for layup and in particular, retirement farms, where abandonments sometimes occur.

The question wasn’t about first and last though, it was specifically about 30 days notice.

[Jealoushe]

@eggbutt

Threats? Do we have threats? I’m to lazy and unconcerned to look at the hidden post. NO ONE ON THIS FORUM NOT CONNECTED TO THE KANAREKS HAS POSTED ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE A CHARGABLE OFFENSE. ASK ME HOW I KNOW! All caps for attention before “someone” accuses me of being

not a single threat was made lol

[smoofox]

@Jealoushe

@smoofox

Well, I do/did. And that is part of the boarding contract

You’ve seen this also? Specifically, if someone is asked to leave/booted out they have to pay the following months board as part of the 30 days notice?

Fairly common around here. Especially for bigger barns with covered or attached arenas. Board is not prorated - so if you give 30 days notice and it is mid-October… you pay for all of November as per the contract. You are paying for that space (think of it as an apartment) - it does not matter if there is a horse in it or not.

[DownYonder]

@cheval_convert

I guess my lack of a police record, speeding or otherwise, excludes me from the illegal elderly mob. (And I had my fuzzy bathrobe ready to go.)

We can make an exception and vote you in!

Heck, I don’t have a fuzzy bathrobe, so I guess they made an exception for me too!

[MHM]

@smoofox

That does not help LK in any way - or her family. The keyboard gymnastics some are going through to now claim that IM is amazing and trustworthy and not JK in any way is a bit much…

Once again, I’m so glad I finally started using the ignore feature. Apparently just in time! Lol.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@trubandloki

It appears that the moderation staff here on COTH is happy enough with that legal document outing @Inigo-montoya as Jonathan Kanarek, because I have no doubt you and some others have reported every post where it has been said and they have not edited it out.

And we know from experience that the mods would have posted a notice of disclaimer if IM was not JK as much as it has been discussed!!! Let’s be logical, folks!

I don’t think that’s true. They permit the speculation. The mods have neither confirmed that IM is JK or that IM is not JK.

Not on the board or in response to a subpoena from Mark Silver.

[Angela_Freda]

@LiberalSnowflake

Something had happened well prior to the shooting that meant she had to be secured at all times outside of the home (it was in some of the early threads, I can’t remember the gist of it). There are other photos that show her on a long line tethered to the deck. I don’t think the biting was all condensed to the time around the shooting. I’m a long term multiple dog owner, and in my opinion she’s a dangerous dog and has been for some time - which is a great shame for her.

I also recall this.
I believe the working student JO who testified started to share about this until that was shut down.

[trubandloki]

@Jealoushe

@BrownDerby

Yes, this can be done in barns with first and last months’ payments in their contracts. Often appears in contracts for layup and in particular, retirement farms, where abandonments sometimes occur.

The question wasn’t about first and last though, it was specifically about 30 days notice.

BrownDerby can clarify for themselves but the way I read their point is that in a barn that charges first and last month rent, a person who is kicked out for cause is paying that last month’s board because it is already paid, they are not getting that returned to them, because the contract says 30 day notice and there is probably some line about being removed for cause.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

Of course if one lawyer can subpoena Coth for user identities, the other lawyers can, too.

Hmmm. Someone is trying to intimidate us into shutting up…

Whatever (thanks, @trubandloki)!

Threats? Do we have threats? I’m to lazy and unconcerned to look at the hidden post. NO ONE ON THIS FORUM NOT CONNECTED TO THE KANAREKS HAS POSTED ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE A CHARGABLE OFFENSE. ASK ME HOW I KNOW! All caps for attention before “someone” accuses me of being

Good grief. @eggbutt is now responding in all caps to posts she claims she hasn’t read. Her post makes about as much sense as you would expect.

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

Of course if one lawyer can subpoena Coth for user identities, the other lawyers can, too.

Hmmm. Someone is trying to intimidate us into shutting up…

Whatever (thanks, @trubandloki)!

No, I’m not trying to “intimidate” you into “shutting up”.

I would have thought it was an obvious observation that once lawyer A had subpoenaed Coth for user identities, lawyers B and C could, too. That really had not occurred to you?

Which means your identity could be made public too @CurrentlyHorseless! Every thought of that???

[trubandloki]

Is it so hard to understand that a person can read the things other people say in response to the comments to those that they have blocked so they know what the conversation is about?

Geez. Not Rocket Surgery here.

[DownYonder]

@LiberalSnowflake

Something had happened well prior to the shooting that meant she had to be secured at all times outside of the home (it was in some of the early threads, I can’t remember the gist of it). There are other photos that show her on a long line tethered to the deck. I don’t think the biting was all condensed to the time around the shooting. I’m a long term multiple dog owner, and in my opinion she’s a dangerous dog and has been for some time - which is a great shame for her.

Wasn’t Jordan asked during the trial if she was afraid of Rosie and she replied that “Everyone was afraid of Rosie” - or something to that effect? And didn’t Schellhorn object and Bilinkas had to drop that line of questioning when Taylor sustained the objection?

[Sdel]

@Scribbler

I think it’s clear JK and KK should be added to the counter suit, and that they will be once they release the information they are with holding now. That is huge. The fact they are digging in their heels suggests they know this perfectly well.

I highly suspect the meltdowns might be because JK and KK are having trouble finding an attorney willing to guarantee them they can get the subpoena quashed and are instead being urged to comply to the fullest extent possible.

[DownYonder]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Strangely enough, @DownYonder found my stating the
obvious was an attempt to “intimidate” and shut people up.

How can such a laughably obvious observation be a source of “intimidation”?

Whatever.

[eggbutt]

There must be a valid reason to request a subpoena. Just cause I want to know who someone is is not a valid reason, unless maybe in NJ (s)

[trubandloki]

@eggbutt

unless maybe in NJ

They do seem to have their own set of rules in NJ, don’t they?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cutter99

@CurrentlyHorseless

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

Of course if one lawyer can subpoena Coth for user identities, the other lawyers can, too.

Hmmm. Someone is trying to intimidate us into shutting up…

Whatever (thanks, @trubandloki)!

No, I’m not trying to “intimidate” you into “shutting up”.

I would have thought it was an obvious observation that once lawyer A had subpoenaed Coth for user identities, lawyers B and C could, too. That really had not occurred to you?

Which means your identity could be made public too @CurrentlyHorseless! Every thought of that???

Yep. If my identity is made public it will reveal I’m not any of the identities the mob has tried to pin on me!

I’m not an insider, not a member of the Kanarek family, and my identity, if revealed, would merely show I’m the random nobody I’ve said I was all along.