MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[Jealoushe]

I don’t see anything new?

[Jealoushe]

@ohnoO

I kind of live in fear that someone I casually know—non horse person—will have seen 48Hours and ask me if I know the story.

LOL this already happened to me…except he was horsey it was my farrier! Definitely helped pass the time for the horses getting done that day giving him all the run down hahah

[Jealoushe]

@BigMama1

Because I don’t think the preponderance of the evidence shows he shot her.

What do you think the evidence shows?

[Hightale]

Must be a problem your end because it’s definitely there.

Help Michael Barisone rebuild his life., organized by Lara Hausken Osborne

[Jealoushe]

That link worked, thanks

[Sdel]

@ohnoO

I can’t figure out how to condense three years of information into a ten minute conversation

You can’t. It’s just not possible.

[gailbyrd]

@ohnoO

I kind of live in fear that someone I casually know—non horse person—will have seen 48Hours and ask me if I know the story.

I can’t figure out how to condense three years of information into a ten minute conversation .

You can’t. 10 min doesn’t even scratch the surface

[erinmeri]

Strange. When I click on the link, it starts to load and then I get “Unknown Error”.

[CindyB59]

Screenshot

[erinmeri]

@CindyB59

Screenshot

Thank you!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Omgitsme

“Good enough” should not be a descriptor for law enforcement.
“Good enough” is reserved for trivial matters. I’m not gonna argue the same tired stuff but that I will absolutely argue.

If you “absolutely” need to argue with my use of the phrase “good enough”, you may substitute the word “sufficient”.

[SpicyPRE]

I love it!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@BigMama1

@CurrentlyHorseless

In the civil case, the plaintiff only needs to establish that he shot her by a preponderance of the evidence, a lower standard than was required in the criminal trial. I don’t understand why you think that a different jury will fail to determine that he shot her, based on the lower standard of proof. The civil trial doesn’t require proof to an absolute standard either.

Because I don’t think the preponderance of the evidence shows he shot her. And neither do the majority of people following and commenting on the case. No reason to think a jury won’t reach the same conclusions as hundreds of members of the public.

Assuming there will be fewer sidebars and lines of questioning shut down by the judge, the jury will get to hear much more detail that wasn’t allowed at the criminal trial. And much of that casts far more than reasonable doubt on LK and RG’s version of events.

I don’t think the majority opinion expressed on the forum is representative of the wider public. The 48 Hours episode took it as given that he got the gun out of the safe and that he shot her. The jury from the criminal trial was chosen from the local population with both sides able to make objections. And you think that the jury was not a representative sample of the public, but the group of posters her is?

They quoted Bilinkas explaining that the NGRI verdict meant that “he was not responsible for his conduct”. Bilinkas artfully declined to describe the nature of the “conduct” for which he was not legally responsible. I’m less delicate, so I’ll say it. He shot her. He shot her. He shot her.

The jury will probably get to hear MB testify in the civil trial, as he doesn’t have the right to refuse to testify without the jury holding it against him. In the criminal trial, he also had protections against prejudicial evidence coming into the record.

[SillyHorse]

@Jealoushe

@BigMama1

Because I don’t think the preponderance of the evidence shows he shot her.

What do you think the evidence shows?

The criminal trial is OVER. Why is anyone rehashing this?

[SillyHorse]

@Omgitsme

“Good enough” should not be a descriptor for law enforcement.
“Good enough” is reserved for trivial matters. I’m not gonna argue the same tired stuff but that I will absolutely argue.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Hightale

Must be a problem your end because it’s definitely there.

https://gofund.me/e873ca1d

What is new?

He is at AKFC and the Grande video has already been posted.

[Jealoushe]

@SillyHorse >

The criminal trial is OVER. Why is anyone rehashing this?

Unnecessary.

Everyone else in the thread is allowed to fight over minute details for thousands of posts…yet for some reason I ask ONE specific poster one small question which let me be clear did not involve you at all, and you’re trying to control my posting? Never seen you say this to anyone else in here so why single me out? I have not been rehashing anything in any of these threads previously.

Not cool.

The question was for @BigMama1 because I was curious about HER thoughts on the matter. Nothing to do with rehashing anything. Direct your frustrations elsewhere cause it ain’t me honey.

[SillyHorse]

@Jealoushe

Everyone else in the thread is allowed to fight over minute details for thousands of posts…yet for some reason I ask ONE specific poster one small question which let me be clear did not involve you at all, and you’re trying to control my posting?

Um, newp. I asked a question. Why you would misinterpret that as trying to control your posting is a mystery.

[DownYonder]

@ohnoO

I kind of live in fear that someone I casually know—non horse person—will have seen 48Hours and ask me if I know the story.

I can’t figure out how to condense three years of information into a ten minute conversation

My boss and a coworker both advised in a team chat the other day that they are true crime junkies. I am so tempted to ask them if they saw the Barisone 48 Hours episode and ask their thoughts. But like you, I can’t figure out how to condense all the data into a short “elevator pitch.”

[Jealoushe]

@SillyHorse

Um, newp. I asked a question. Why you would misinterpret that as trying to control your posting is a mystery.

Your question made 0 sense in relation to my post.