MB update

[LilRanger]

@eggbutt

I thought rules for civil trials were much different than criminal trials. I would think everything is fair game in the civil trial, particularly if those recordings show conspiracy to Finish the Bast

It’s not that everything is fair game, but the scope of what is being alleged is different, because now the actions of LK are front and center, and issues aren’t just the shooting, but everything that led up to it instead.

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@Knights_Mom

No for the criminal case. It’s probably in effect until Krol is over.

Could they ask, over in the civil case, to keep it that way, hypothetically?

They can ask. No idea how that might rule. It might work.

[Warmblood1]

Some things I’m wondering will be discussed in the civil case:

Trajectory of the bullet: this hasn’t been discussed a lot but it never sat right with me. LE said the trajectory appeared to have originated in front of the truck. LK states that MB stood behind a bush and shot point blank.

The confusion with the cell phones. In LK’s recollection of the event, she always said she couldn’t share specific information regarding the phones which I found suspicious. She couldn’t state how she called 911, for example.

I’ve noticed in another thread that LK tried to assert that things with MB went very sour in a matter of 7-8 days. However, the criminal trial began to establish that things went bad from the start with LK bringing RG as a tenant and the increasing number of horses. I hope they can establish that the situation went sour over an extended period and show that LK had ample time to move herself and her horses from the situation.

[jvanrens]

@ekat

Also, mildly interesting, but fairly trivial. Note that she’s responding to a 3 month old post.

I didn’t see that one, but then there’s this one, same MO.

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

Some things I’m wondering will be discussed in the civil case:

Trajectory of the bullet: this hasn’t been discussed a lot but it never sat right with me. LE said the trajectory appeared to have originated in front of the truck. LK states that MB stood behind a bush and shot point blank.

The confusion with the cell phones. In LK’s recollection of the event, she always said she couldn’t share specific information regarding the phones which I found suspicious. She couldn’t state how she called 911, for example.

I’ve noticed in another thread that LK tried to assert that things with MB went very sour in a matter of 7-8 days. However, the criminal trial began to establish that things went bad from the start with LK bringing RG as a tenant and the increasing number of horses. I hope they can establish that the situation went sour over an extended period and show that LK had ample time to move herself and her horses from the situation.

You bring up some very good points. I hope there is some exploration into those.

You know what else I would like to see explored? That part of the manifesto and other FB posts where she talks about forcing him into letting her into his NJ home. That and what was the lawsuit plan someone else mentioned? Mr B got to nibble around the edges of it in the criminal trial, but I want more.

[ekat]

Oh my goodness, that one is funny. Clearly the poster is referring to her 2nd day on the stand.

[Angela_Freda]

She doesn’t see how the person is referring to day two of her being on witness stand, not day two of the trial?
Whoa!

Might want to go edit that one, LaLa.

[Sdel]

@jvanrens

@ekat

Also, mildly interesting, but fairly trivial. Note that she’s responding to a 3 month old post.

I didn’t see that one, but then there’s this one, same MO.

That one is hilarious because the poster is obviously referring to LK and her 2nd day of testimony and there she is trying to pretend she misunderstood the comment.

[Knights_Mom]

Don’t forget she did that other post where she made fun of someone who responded to a 3 month old post.

Irony.

[eggbutt]

@Jealoushe

@3PonyFarm

I thought that deactivating facebook before civil litigation was a big no no.

In my experience Law enforcement will encourage victims to keep their FB pages active (just very locked down) so they have the evidence required if needed and to preserve evidence or access to it easily. I was specifically instructed not to delete anything and screen capture anything I could.

I don’t believe they have jurisdiction to tell someone to delete or close their SM page based on no contact orders. The laws on cyber stalking and cyber harassment are notoriously loose and insufficient.

Think of the Tinder Swindler. Or any of the scammers/catfishers. The company who owns the app like Facebook/Twitter/Tinder etc can ban the person, but LE or the legal system doesn’t have the power to do that.

Then why do you believe she recently made the post above thread?

[DownYonder]

@trubandloki

The judge ordered me to stop posting on the internet during the trial and I would not do that so my family locked down my accounts to protect me from getting in trouble for not following the judges order.

Since she is an adult, how could her family lock down her accounts? Wouldn’t that require a POA? And wouldn’t they have to get a legal declaration of incompetency in order to act on said POA?

[trubandloki]

@ekat

Oh my goodness, that one is funny. Clearly the poster is referring to her 2nd day on the stand.

Only clear to people who do not feel the need to tell everyone else they are too stupid to be in their world.

@DownYonder

Since she is an adult, how could her family lock down her accounts? Wouldn’t that require a POA? And wouldn’t they have to get a legal declaration of incompetency in order to act on said POA?

Daddy is in charge of her money. Do I need to say anything?

[DownYonder]

@Warmblood1

Trajectory of the bullet: this hasn’t been discussed a lot but it never sat right with me. LE said the trajectory appeared to have originated in front of the truck. LK states that MB stood behind a bush and shot point blank.

Wasn’t that testimony referring specifically to the damage in the door frame that LK/RG and the prosecutor alleged was from the “third bullet” (of which they never found either the spent round or a shell casing)? I thought I remembered the detective pointing out “defects” in various saddle pads to support the claim that the round had grazed or gone through the saddle pads. And when asked about the trajectory of said round, he said it apparently originated from in front of MB’s truck. I was half-expecting Schellhorn to use that testimony to allege that MB had started firing as soon as he exited the truck, but that wouldn’t have coincided with the stories that LK and RG were telling.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Only clear to people who do not feel the need to tell everyone else they are too stupid to be in their world.

Like this? From a couple nights ago?

[DownYonder]

@trubandloki

@DownYonder

Since she is an adult, how could her family lock down her accounts? Wouldn’t that require a POA? And wouldn’t they have to get a legal declaration of incompetency in order to act on said POA?

Daddy is in charge of her money. Do I need to say anything?

So you are thinking that the existence of the trust proves that he holds a POA over her? Do we know that is truly the case? I thought there was some discussion earlier that trusts can be set up under all sorts of circumstances that have nothing to do with the “competency” of the beneficiary.

[MHM]

Wow. Still more projection with that last comment.

[Knights_Mom]

Every time a Lauren posts a Barisone angel gets more wings.

[Angela_Freda]

Its like she has to say something, and all she has is insults that do nothing to negate what the person wrote.

Meanwhile serving up material a plenty for the upcoming case.

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

Every time a Lauren posts a Barisone angel gets more wings.

[ekat]

It’s really quite something, isn’t it? I am just fascinated by the behavior, still in that watching a train go off the track and down a ravine and imploding kind of way.