MB update

[Warmblood1]

@ekat

Basically, that’s the classic “some other dude did it” defense. LK, in her suit, is saying she didn’t cause Michael’s injuries, some other “indispensable party” did and Michael failed to bring him into the suit.

The thing is, she’s going to have to either a) drop that defense or b) name names and give evidence that some other dude did it. My money is on RG being the other dude, and he’s getting thrown right under the bus.

I would bet one of the other dudes is MHG. That would explain why k klan has gone great lengths to attack her character and blame her entirely.

ETA: and if also RG, why he has never been defended or praised except for the moment he outran a bullet.

[cutter99]

@Sdel

@cutter99

Well, we know per her own testimony, LK had ungranted access to the office, which also means RG had access as well.

What would LK do if RG were to jailed or imprisoned for crimes revealed to have been committed against Michael?

Find a new laundry boy/ driver/ groom/ super hero? Post an ad on Monster or Indeed? Hire a recruiter to fill the position?

[MorganSercu]

No daddy to withdraw money from “the bank”?

[DownYonder]

@ekat

It’s interesting how she put out there in the suit that some other indispensable party caused MB’s loss/injury, though.

Hmmm, that interesting tidbit makes we wonder why someone has been so insistent recently that RG was a hero for “saving three lives that day.” Now why would she throw the hero of the day under the bus?

[MorganSercu]

@ekat

(m) unlawful invasion of his privacy

Stay out of people’s medicine cabinets & offices.

[Knights_Mom]

@DownYonder

@ekat

It’s interesting how she put out there in the suit that some other indispensable party caused MB’s loss/injury, though.

Hmmm, that interesting tidbit makes we wonder why someone has been so insistent recently that RG was a hero for “saving three lives that day.” Now why would she throw the hero of the day under the bus?

Because people of a certain morality do that. Every rat for themselves.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

You are really reaching, dude. If the reason was as nefarious as you seem to want folks to believe, please speculate as to why only a couple of the firearms had been disabled, but the other ones left operational. Inquiring minds want to know.

I did not say removing the firing pins was “nefarious”. Quite the opposite, it was probably prudent.

I’m asking why the safe contained several hand guns which were inoperable because the firing pins were removed. IF the firing pins were removed because it was known that MB, or someone else on the farm was mentally unstable, and/or had anger issues, then that would indicate to me that someone knew having operable handguns on the property posed a significant risk. IMHO, that supports LKs claim that SGF was negligent in permitting RC to illegally bring the gun used in the shooting on the property.

[MorganSercu]

@Warmblood1

I would bet one of the other dudes is MHG

MHG teleported on the scene, released Rosie, beat Michael senseless, broke Michael’s arm and magically disappeared? Seems like a bit of a reach.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

You are really reaching, dude. If the reason was as nefarious as you seem to want folks to believe, please speculate as to why only a couple of the firearms had been disabled, but the other ones left operational. Inquiring minds want to know.

I did not say removing the firing pins was “nefarious”. Quite the opposite, it was probably prudent.

I’m asking why the safe contained several hand guns which were inoperable because the firing pins were removed. IF the firing pins were removed because it was known that MB, or someone else on the farm was mentally unstable, and/or had anger issues, then that would indicate to me that someone knew having operable handguns on the property posed a significant risk. IMHO, that supports LKs claim that SGF was negligent in permitting RC to illegally bring the gun used in the shooting on the property.

But the firing pins WERE NOT removed for that reason. Logic dictates that for that line of reasoning to be true then ALL the guns should have been inoperable, not just one.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Warmblood1

@ekat

Basically, that’s the classic “some other dude did it” defense. LK, in her suit, is saying she didn’t cause Michael’s injuries, some other “indispensable party” did and Michael failed to bring him into the suit.

The thing is, she’s going to have to either a) drop that defense or b) name names and give evidence that some other dude did it. My money is on RG being the other dude, and he’s getting thrown right under the bus.

I would bet one of the other dudes is MHG. That would explain why k klan has gone great lengths to attack her character and blame her entirely.

ETA: and if also RG, why he has never been defended or praised except for the moment he outran a bullet.

If LK is trying to hold MHG liable, why would she have refrained from naming her in the suit?

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Warmblood1

@ekat

Basically, that’s the classic “some other dude did it” defense. LK, in her suit, is saying she didn’t cause Michael’s injuries, some other “indispensable party” did and Michael failed to bring him into the suit.

The thing is, she’s going to have to either a) drop that defense or b) name names and give evidence that some other dude did it. My money is on RG being the other dude, and he’s getting thrown right under the bus.

I would bet one of the other dudes is MHG. That would explain why k klan has gone great lengths to attack her character and blame her entirely.

ETA: and if also RG, why he has never been defended or praised except for the moment he outran a bullet.

If LK is trying to hold MHG liable, why would she have refrained from naming her in the suit?

Because LK is holding RG responsible not MHG.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

then that would indicate to me that someone knew having operable handguns on the property posed a significant risk.

But there WERE operational hand guns on the property. Two of them.

@CurrentlyHorseless

LKs claim that SGF was negligent in permitting RC to illegally bring the gun used in the shooting on the property

Again, that’s not her specific claim. I posted her claim against SGF up thread.

[Warmblood1]

@MorganSercu

MHG teleported on the scene, released Rosie, beat Michael senseless, broke Michael’s arm and magically disappeared? Seems like a bit of a reach.

No, I’m saying LK could possibly state that MHG was responsible for his mental distress, not LK.

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

I would bet one of the other dudes is MHG. That would explain why k klan has gone great lengths to attack her character and blame her entirely

I agree that they have certainly pointed fingers at her. But LK certainly didn’t sue her for anything (yet). I can’t fathom a way to make her liable for Michael’s broken head and arm. And those dog bites.

[DownYonder]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed from the hand gun/revolvers to render them inoperable?

Since you keep bringing this up - a friend inherited a handgun from his father, and they had the firing pin removed before transporting it to the state where my friend resided, in accordance with the law at the time. So that is one non-nefarious reason why a firing pin might be removed.

[ekat]

@DownYonder

Hmmm, that interesting tidbit makes we wonder why someone has been so insistent recently that RG was a hero for “saving three lives that day.” Now why would she throw the hero of the day under the bus?

It depends on your audience, though. When telling your tail of woe, and explaining the evil acts of a nefarious Michael Barisone, you need the hero. But when you’re staring down a counter claim for the injuries, well, RG is a convenient scapegoat.

[eggbutt]

My, my how the tables have turned in this group. For 2 1/2 years I have been the whipping boy for the Kanarek supporters for my “speculations” and ideas of events of the day; but, now it is okay for those supporters (g) to make grandiose assumptions and accusations using the word “if” and slinging absolutely ridiculous scenarios of Barisone removing specific firing pins but not others; of not paying a portion of his medical bills due to nefarious reasons; and, my person favorite of the day - his insurance company, partners and EVERYBODY should have known Barisone was mentally ill and violent. Yet, our 3D, super astute chess player waltzed right in, eyes wide open with her plans to destroy Barisone and his business. Seriously? Do you really read and/or believe what you post?

This really has become comedy with the grasping of LK defense at all costs.

[jvanrens]

@Knights_Mom

@DownYonder

@ekat

It’s interesting how she put out there in the suit that some other indispensable party caused MB’s loss/injury, though.

Hmmm, that interesting tidbit makes we wonder why someone has been so insistent recently that RG was a hero for “saving three lives that day.” Now why would she throw the hero of the day under the bus?

Because people of a certain morality do that. Every rat for themselves.

Rather insulting to rats don’t you think (and I hate rats!)?

[DownYonder]

@Sdel

Yes, because until the conclusion of the trial the LK narrative has been that Michael is faking/not mentally unstable and that he was actually engaging in a purposeful and planned plot.

Good point!

[MorganSercu]

Still seems like a stretch.