Michael Barisone Hearing, Tuesday, April 23

[Jenerationx]

Well… she kept claiming to want to tell her story… and told us over and over and over that there would be “bombshells.” The only bombshells we ever got were the inconsistencies in her story, the “finish the bastard,” and her admitting that she lies on social media. Then she declined to sit for deposition or say anything to 48 Hours. The only place she will tell her story is on SM, where we all know she lies.

[Angela_Freda]

Oh, their comments were very interesting, even though they got some of the details wrong about the situation (owed rent).

“Why didn’t they just leave?”
Indeed.

I wonder if they ever talked about the verdict?

[SpicyPRE]

@Angela_Freda

“Why didn’t they just leave ?”

if Netflix is doing a special, I hope they name it “Why didnt they just leave?”

[Djones]

I don’t know. I just searched Kanarek on Spotify, I don’t believe another episode came back.

It’s a bit of fresh air to hear two disinterested 3rd parties scratching their heads about “why didn’t they just leave???” I mean I know we all think it but we’re in the horsey bubble of awareness about the situation.

[Paint_Party]

@Jenerationx

The only place she will tell her story is on SM, where we all know she lies.

Even more bizarre is that, from what I’ve seen linked, she’s mostly telling her story to herself and her alters.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

[jvanrens]

[jvanrens]

@Paint_Party

@Jenerationx

The only place she will tell her story is on SM, where we all know she lies.

Even more bizarre is that, from what I’ve seen linked, she’s mostly telling her story to herself and her alters.

Still telling it too just a few weeks ago on Reddit. I guess she has to try to keep herself out there even if she has to talk to herself to do it.

[K_VanOlst]

@jvanrens

Still telling it too just a few weeks ago on Reddit. I guess she has to try to keep herself out there even if she has to talk to herself to do it.

Every time I think she cannot top whatever weirdness she’s currently engaging is… She does.

[rothmpp]

@OverandOnward

And then even after getting his lawyers involved, MB broke Landlord Rule #1 – Do not go to the property when you are in the process of eviction. In most jurisdictions that is the law.

I’m going to issue my one and only response to what has be hashed and rehashed over and over again.

The problem with this is that this was anything but a typical landlord/tenant situation. They all lived on the same piece of property. It was not realistic or do-able for MB to not go to the property while the process was going. He lived in the same house (until moving into the barn to limit exposure). His business was entirely based on that farm. He was doing what he needed to do to keep his business running.

If there is a law in NJ/Morris County/ Long Valley jurisdiction forbidding him to be at the house while the eviction process was going on, then link it here. This board by and large does not accept random “in most…” statements without supporting documentations when talking about legal specifics.

You’ve also dumbed this evil family down to a simple landlord/tenant situation, which while that is a definite component, it is so very much more complicated than than. It is also a business/client situation. It is also a stalker situation. It is also a vendetta situation. You cannot just parse it down to “if he’d only just evicted them”. She very clearly indicated she had every intention of ruining his professional and personal life and had NO intention of leaving the farm.

The problem also stems from there is no one in LK’s life that even attempts to limit or reason with her. She’s been coddled and enabled by everyone in her life with no consequences.

It’s well and good to say all he needed to do was ride it out until they were forcibly removed by law enforcement, but that is an easy answer when your livelihood and job is as a landlord. MB never intended to be a landlord, so expecting him to calmly ride out the process when he was being run over is not realistic (though neither is shooting someone, regardless of who did it and how it went down, which we will never know for sure) and he and the barn certainly did not deserve to be mentally and physically tormented by two unhinged grifters.

[cutter99]

Awesome post @rothmpp!!!

[SuzieQNutter]

@Angela_Freda

Agreed she wants to tell her story, alas it’s a tall, tall tale. An unbelievable fairy tale full of murder plots and creeping ninjas.

As far as I can remember LK has never said anything about being a barefoot ninja. It came out in court that 2 people saw her wearing black with a veil, I think, and no shoes.

[Djones]

@SuzieQNutter

As far as I can remember LK has never said anything about being a barefoot ninja. It came out in court that 2 people saw her wearing black with a veil, I think, and no shoes.

I didn’t read Angela’s post that literally.

[DownYonder]

@rothmpp

two unhinged grifters.

Super post but I had to add this to the last line:

…two unhinged DRUG ADDICT grifters.

[KurPlexed]

Thank you! What an excellent post.

[Jenerationx]

I’m thinking “Who Does That?”

[Knights_Mom]

@rothmpp

@OverandOnward

And then even after getting his lawyers involved, MB broke Landlord Rule #1 – Do not go to the property when you are in the process of eviction. In most jurisdictions that is the law.

I’m going to issue my one and only response to what has be hashed and rehashed over and over again.

The problem with this is that this was anything but a typical landlord/tenant situation. They all lived on the same piece of property. It was not realistic or do-able for MB to not go to the property while the process was going. He lived in the same house (until moving into the barn to limit exposure). His business was entirely based on that farm. He was doing what he needed to do to keep his business running.

If there is a law in NJ/Morris County/ Long Valley jurisdiction forbidding him to be at the house while the eviction process was going on, then link it here. This board by and large does not accept random “in most…” statements without supporting documentations when talking about legal specifics.

You’ve also dumbed this evil family down to a simple landlord/tenant situation, which while that is a definite component, it is so very much more complicated than than. It is also a business/client situation. It is also a stalker situation. It is also a vendetta situation. You cannot just parse it down to “if he’d only just evicted them”. She very clearly indicated she had every intention of ruining his professional and personal life and had NO intention of leaving the farm.

The problem also stems from there is no one in LK’s life that even attempts to limit or reason with her. She’s been coddled and enabled by everyone in her life with no consequences.

It’s well and good to say all he needed to do was ride it out until they were forcibly removed by law enforcement, but that is an easy answer when your livelihood and job is as a landlord. MB never intended to be a landlord, so expecting him to calmly ride out the process when he was being run over is not realistic (though neither is shooting someone, regardless of who did it and how it went down, which we will never know for sure) and he and the barn certainly did not deserve to be mentally and physically tormented by two unhinged grifters.

Nailed it!!

[SuzieQNutter]

@Djones

@SuzieQNutter

As far as I can remember LK has never said anything about being a barefoot ninja. It came out in court that 2 people saw her wearing black with a veil, I think, and no shoes.

I didn’t read Angela’s post that literally.

Hee hee you nailed me to a T. I am very literal.

[chancellor2]

It’s all well and good to say he needed to ride it out. but the amount of riding it out was like sitting on a bucking bronco.
I cannot imagine the horror of dealing with that day in and day out.