I actually wonder if this is more projection. Considering the planning, and obsession with this board, I wonder if there wasn’t some pre positioning done to be able to swoop in and cry foul on an anticipated CotH thread about Barisone’s expected SS ban.
6 Likes
There is absolutely oodles of projection!!
4 Likes
I think we’re staring at the same rabbit hole. Like a Jack Russell Terrier.
9 Likes
Oh, and before it is speculated upon, I am not Lara Osborne either.
I am also not Keyser Soze.
17 Likes
8 Likes
I mean, if you think about it, if the plan was to be able to come in as a SS victim of Barisone on a thread about his “banning”……this whole thing would feel a lot like a community level betrayal. Might explain a lot….
5 Likes
Weird that IM claims to know who everyone is and even where some of us live, but for some reason is completely unaware of Trub’s years of posting history that prove she’s not LO - not that anyone believed it anyway.
26 Likes
@Fargaloo is one of my all time favorite COTH posters! I want to bestow her with a bathrobe!
20 Likes
Drop the LO/trub debate. They are not the same person.
56 Likes
Thank you Moderator 1
11 Likes
My father joined up right after Pearl Harbor, and remained in the Navy for 20 years.
When asked about his service, he’d merely say that he was only doing what anyone ought to, and was quite averse to any “hero” type puffery.
Like several other relatives and friends, he kept his medals (including a Navy Cross, IIRC) in a cigar box and didn’t make a fuss about them.
25 Likes
Aw @cutter99 that’s the sweetest thing!! I love it! I’m off to my virtual basement with my virtual robe and virtual fuzzy slippers!!
15 Likes
I hope to see the Silver follow up to this soon… and hope it is golden!
13 Likes
It was also a nice touch that RG made the call the exact minute the first plane was hitting the tower, and before anyone knew it was deliberate.
26 Likes
I have some questions about Stone’s newest filings. Are they the same? I can’t see a difference between them but maybe I’m not looking carefully enough. If they are the same, why would he file duplicates?
Also, the wording “constrained to respond” sounds as though he was under some duress to make that filing. I think that was mentioned upthread but I am wondering if he was asked (told?) by JK to request that the subpoenas be quashed but he declined at first since he doesn’t represent JK. But then LK contacted him and directed him to issue the quash request and he acquiesced but registered his reservations by using the term “constrained.”
Any thoughts from the legal eagles?
2 Likes
Two subpoenas - Jonathan and Kirby Kanarek
Two Motions for Contempt/to Compel
Two motions to quash (they are identical as well)
Two responses from SGF and Barisone
Two entries from GAS today to address each response, even though he only wrote one document.
It’s a weird choice of wording, for sure.
10 Likes
Hey @CurrentlyHorseless, did you miss yet another post by the mods or are you ignoring this one too? It was posted a good 10 minutes before your post.
9 Likes
Who had a daughter riding/working in the barn with MB?
3 Likes
“Constrained to respond” is generally meant to mean “I didn’t want to respond but I have to”
It was bizarre wording. As the plaintiff’s attorney he can’t object as counsel for the non-party witness. To me he’s basically saying he knows his response won’t go anywhere.
34 Likes
