Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[SoCoPony]

You’re ahead of this horse.

[ThreeFigs]

I am so very, very, behind on this MB/LK stuff. Wake me when it’s all over…

[erinmeri]

@MHM

I feel like I’ve missed some of these developments, so I can only imagine they are from people I have on ignore. Thank goodness. Lol.

I am equally confused. I got in my car to head home from the barn and happened to notice I had been inexplicably tagged by a certain poster, came home to find apparently misattributed statements as the reason, and now can’t figure out where I left off of the thread because there is a whole side conversation about autoerotic asphyxiation and I hadn’t followed since yesterday.

Also, if someone finds the out-of-character pearl clutching I did, I will apologize, but it seems really odd. Those of you who know me in real life know I swear like a sailor. And this isn’t the first time posts have been misattributed to me, right, @CanteringCarrot? Odd.

[Knights_Mom]

@MorganSercu

Except ekat has posted documents as they became available online.

Someone groused that it sounded like MB’s lawyer(s) filings sounded as though they were written by members of COTH. I still suspect there are people in their offices who took it upon themselves to read COTH and perhaps some of the posts were memorable.

Maybe some COTHers are more involved in law than they let on because, yanno, people lie on SM.

Maybe some COTHers ARE MBs attorneys. Or their employees.

Wouldn’t THAT be a hoot, eh?

[smoofox]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Yes, you are constantly misrepresenting what I say. I’m not sure you are capable of responding without automatically restating and misrepresenting what I say into something easier for you to knock down.

No, I quote you (so your own words) and then offer my opinion… which is sorta how a forum works.Then you - and others - get to offer your opinion. And so on and so forth.

Perhaps you could just quote my actual words and respond to them without attributing to me something I didn’t say.

See above.

In tagging, I generally attempt to mirror the way ban other poster does it doesn’t tag me. Are you a non tagger? If so, I will attempt to refrain from tagging you.

Um… what? You can tag whoever you please - tagging someone you have already quoted is just redundant and pointless - as I said. I could not help but read that last sentence in a Mr. Spock or Sheldon Cooper voice - which is not an insult.

Blue. ^^^

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

This question may have been asked and answered as I’m just catching up, but what in the he!! does LO have to do with the court filings or the exhibits? Is she a plaintiff or dependent in the civil cases?

As MBs closest personal supporter, MB may have been authorized his defense team to give LO access to records the lawyers have that are not publicly posted.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

This question may have been asked and answered as I’m just catching up, but what in the he!! does LO have to do with the court filings or the exhibits? Is she a plaintiff or dependent in the civil cases?

As MBs closest personal supporter, MB may have authorized his defense team to give LO access to records the lawyers have that are not publicly posted.

So what?! She sure hasn’t shared anything with me or anyone I know. I don’t think the woman has time to breath or have a meal to be honest. Running a successful business AND maintaining a working training facility, training her own horse, showing her own horse, paying bills, and speaking with MB as she can sure doesn’t leave her much time to read or share documents. Isn’t that what MB is paying a small fortune for professionals to do?

Get a life CH. You’re grasping at straws trying to defend your idol and his complicit family. As LK tells others, maybe take up knitting.

[MHM]

@erinmeri

there is a whole side conversation about autoerotic asphyxiation

I completely missed the start of that detour as well, so I don’t know how that happened.

I did notice the other day that sometimes a few of the posts would not appear in order at first, and then they would pop up later when I backtracked on the thread. So I’m wondering if that could be what happened. I don’t know.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

This question may have been asked and answered as I’m just catching up, but what in the he!! does LO have to do with the court filings or the exhibits? Is she a plaintiff or dependent in the civil cases?

As MBs closest personal supporter, MB may have authorized his defense team to give LO access to records the lawyers have that are not publicly posted.

So what?! She sure hasn’t shared anything with me or anyone I know. I don’t think the woman has time to breath or have a meal to be honest. Running a successful business AND maintaining a working training facility, training her own horse, showing her own horse, paying bills, and speaking with MB as she can sure doesn’t leave her much time to read or share documents. Isn’t that what MB is paying a small fortune for professionals to do?

Get a life CH. You’re grasping as straws trying to defend your idol and his complicit family. As LK tells others, maybe take up knitting.

No one has suggested LO shared any documents with you.

If you want to know “So what!” read the thread, in particular the part in which IM speculated that Trubandloki was LO.

JK is not my idol. I have no idols. I’m not interested in knitting.

[MHM]

@Knights_Mom

@MorganSercu

Except ekat has posted documents as they became available online.

Someone groused that it sounded like MB’s lawyer(s) filings sounded as though they were written by members of COTH. I still suspect there are people in their offices who took it upon themselves to read COTH and perhaps some of the posts were memorable.

Maybe some COTHers are more involved in law than they let on because, yanno, people lie on SM.

Maybe some COTHers ARE MBs attorneys. Or their employees.

Wouldn’t THAT be a hoot, eh?

It did seem like during the trial, Mr. B said some things that sounded remarkably similar to some of the conversations that had appeared on the BB.

So I don’t know if there was cross pollination, or great minds were just thinking alike, or what. Lol.

[eggbutt]

@MHM

@erinmeri

there is a whole side conversation about autoerotic asphyxiation

I completely missed the start of that detour as well, so I don’t know how that happened.

I did notice the other day that sometimes a few of the posts would not appear in order at first, and then they would pop up later when I backtracked on the thread. So I’m wondering if that could be what happened. I don’t know.

It began when I responded to a post by saying “Patience Grasshopper”.

Then someone mentioned the TV show that came from, Kung-Fu, which then led to David Carradine and his death at a young age and what he apparently was doing when he may have accidentally hanged himself.

[MHM]

Ahhhhh. Thanks.

[Knights_Mom]

@MHM

@Knights_Mom

@MorganSercu

Except ekat has posted documents as they became available online.

Someone groused that it sounded like MB’s lawyer(s) filings sounded as though they were written by members of COTH. I still suspect there are people in their offices who took it upon themselves to read COTH and perhaps some of the posts were memorable.

Maybe some COTHers are more involved in law than they let on because, yanno, people lie on SM.

Maybe some COTHers ARE MBs attorneys. Or their employees.

Wouldn’t THAT be a hoot, eh?

It did seem like during the trial, Mr. B said some things that sounded remarkably similar to some of the conversations that had appeared on the BB.

So I don’t know if there was cross pollination, or great minds were just thinking alike, or what. Lol.

[eggbutt]

At one point the Kanareks were directing people to the forums to read all the victim shaming. That may have backfired on them rather than ignoring and being silent because then people began reading to see the various Kanarek posts. Their need for attention created a lot of clicks I’m sure!

[MHM]

@eggbutt

At one point the Kanareks were directing people to the forums to read all the victim shaming.

They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Yes, you are constantly misrepresenting what I say. I’m not sure you are capable of responding without automatically restating and misrepresenting what I say into something easier for you to knock down.

Perhaps you could just quote my actual words and respond to them without attributing to me something I didn’t say.

In tagging, I generally attempt to mirror the way ban other poster does it doesn’t tag me. Are you a non tagger? If so, I will attempt to refrain from tagging you

So, when you misrepresent what I say that’s okay? When you tag me when I haven’t been participating in the conversation to misrepresent me, that’s okay? If I actually clutched pearls, which I find really unlikely, please present receipts. I find that behavior from me surprising, as I am not offended by that Instagram post and I flip people off on the daily, and I swear like a sailor, but I guess maybe I somehow either regressed to a Pollyanna or I made an incidental comment that said it was classless and you’ve ascribed some kind of importance to it that it doesn’t deserve.

As for tagging, I have precisely no idea what this word salad means. “In tagging, I generally attempt to mirror the way ban other poster does it doesn’t tag me.” I don’t know what your tagging strategy is, but I would prefer if you don’t tag me at all. Thanks!

[Edited to delete an extraneous “you”.]

[erinmeri]

@eggbutt

It began when I responded to a post by saying “Patience Grasshopper”.

Then someone mentioned the TV show that came from, Kung-Fu, which then led to David Carradine and his death at a young age and what he apparently was doing when he may have accidentally hanged himself.

The bizarre tangents these threads take are interesting!

[erinmeri]

@MHM

They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.

[Omgitsme]

See you in 2025.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@erinmeri

As for tagging, I have precisely no idea what this word salad means. “In tagging, I generally attempt to mirror the way ban other poster does it doesn’t tag me.” I don’t know what your tagging strategy is, but I would prefer if you don’t tag me at all. Thanks!

That statement contains a typo.

I was trying to say that I attempt to use tagging with posters who typically tag me, and try to refrain from tagging posters who usually don’t tag me.

That’s what I meant by “mirror”.

If I misremembered the comment dumping on LK for flipping the bird when I attributed it to you, I apologize. I am well aware that I am capable of misremembering.

While I am capable of misremembering, I do not intentionally misrepresent other people’s posts.