Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[ohnoO]

@smoofox

(gawd, I’m a slacker) …

Hey, I resemble that remark

[Omgitsme]

I stated my name on the first thread and no one has bothered my associates. I even restated it in this thread. I have real world experience with RG and LK so I’m really puzzled why you were singled out.

[DownYonder]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Am I saying MHG “caused” his insanity? No, I’m not. I’m saying if the provocations that “pushed him over the edge” are going to be litigated in the civil case, LK would have have named MHG as a defendant. Not for conspiracy, but for causing the insanity.

She’s not named as a defendant because determining what combination of factors caused MBs insanity is not possible.

I haven’t read the specified claims in her lawsuit in a while, so please refresh my memory. Is one of her claims that MB shot her because he was insane?

[DownYonder]

@Sdel

I just wanted to say, the written discovery deadline has now passed. The Kanareks have officially failed to comply with their agreed upon deadlines.

Do we know that for a fact? What if they had sent the requested items to arrive at the various defense counsel’s offices just before closing yesterday? Will something show up on the docket on Monday to indicate that?

[DownYonder]

@BigMama1

@CurrentlyHorseless

I am not welcome to stand on the sidelines and contribute my opinions without being mocked, insulted, badgered, accused of being a Kanarek insider, and having my posts distorted and twisted into straw men.

Time to take a break from playing that violin. It’s not personal and nobody hates you. What a lot of people have said very clearly they dislike is your repeated rejection of facts, your pedantic and repetitive posting style, your constant demands that people justify or explain their comments to you, your circular logic, your misinterpretations of the law (despite being given the correct information by people with actual legal knowledge), your need to comment on every single post, and your defence of the indefensible.

If people find your opinions baseless, worthy of mockery, or indicative of being an insider then they are probably going to comment on it. That’s kind of how discussion boards work.

People disagree with you because they think you are wrong. It’s really that simple.

[eggbutt]

Oh no! Please let’s not start demanding proof from @sdel! It’s a logical conclusion they haven’t responded after all these months. Why break their pattern of non-compliance?!

[Sdel]

@DownYonder

Do we know that for a fact? What if they had sent the requested items to arrive at the various defense counsel’s offices just before closing yesterday? Will something show up on the docket on Monday to indicate that?

Incredibly unlikely that they responded since in the meantime GAS is trying desperately to limit LK’s deposition to exclude the things she did to drive MB insane.

[DownYonder]

@Sdel

Incredibly unlikely that they responded since in the meantime GAS is trying desperately to limit LK’s deposition to exclude the things she did to drive MB insane.

Good point. I was trying to give them the benefit of the doubt even though they have proven time and again that they have no intention of complying with court directives.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@BigMama1

If people find your opinions baseless, worthy of mockery, or indicative of being an insider then they are probably going to comment on it. That’s kind of how discussion boards work.

I find plenty of posts eminently worthy of mockery, but nevertheless choke it down and respond respectfully.

Yes, I know the insulting, condescending, and mocking posts are how the board works. I’m not stooping to that type of mud slinging.

But you do you.

[Knights_Mom]

@BigMama1

It’s interesting to see the list of the most frequent posters, and certainly refutes the claims from some that they just innocently sit on the sidelines until they are viciously attacked out of nowhere and have to defend themselves. I’m also curious why someone chose to target me by contacting my trainer and editor when I am down near the bottom of the list. Hardly a mob ringleader.

My guess is that they had a list of posters and tried to ascertain the identity of each one and they were able to figure yours out.

I have no doubt that if other identities like mine could be ascertained, retribution would be tried against myself as well.

[DownYonder]

@smoofox

or flying in anything as lowly as an old Cessna 150.

Hey, don’t denigrate the Cessna 150. Humble as it may be, a heck of a lot of people learned to fly in one of those things - perhaps even Musk’s own pilot!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@BatCoach

@CurrentlyHorseless

Really? What “hell” was paid when Sdel attempted to out me as LKs sister?

She was not banned for attempting to doxx me.

Your rage would only be justified if you are LKs sister. You clearly aren’t, so why is Sdel’s harmless speculation so bothersome?

She was attempting to doxx me. She didn’t succeed, but her intention was to doxx. That’s obviously a hostile, nasty move.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@BatCoach

Your rage would only be justified if you are LKs sister. You clearly aren’t, so why is Sdel’s harmless speculation so bothersome?

Which completely ignores the fact that I didn’t say CH was LK’s sister, she made that leap on her own over something I said about where YD might have gotten the information that YD got banned for.

You had an elaborate theory as to why YD was a particular sister of LK’s complete with information from the sisters work
history, then said I was YD because I used a two word phrase YD once happened to use.

You tried to out me as both a banned poster and a IRL person.

[smoofox]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I find plenty of posts eminently worthy of mockery, but nevertheless choke it down and respond respectfully.

Yes, I know the insulting, condescending, and mocking posts are how the board works. I’m not stooping to that type of mud slinging.

But you do you.

You do your own version of that “mud slinging”… so you have “stooped”. And no, you do not always respond respectfully. It is that kind of elitist rhetoric that tends to get responses you may not like - and yet you simply refuse to own it or admit it.

As for me… I own all my snark. All my snide comments. I admit when I screw up - and I have. I do not do insults - but then some can find an insult in almost anything - if that is all they are looking for… and it serves their narrative.

I do not hide under a victim umbrella to pretend I never do any of that. Nor do I claim that things have been done to me that never happened (doxxed)* and I have only had a couple of flat out rants here over the years that I did not edit and re-edit and re-re-edit first before posting… and that has not happened for a very long time. One was in CE and the other was in Racing.

99% of the time, (as I said last night) I keep my inner Tim Minchin At His Raging Best on a tight rein with a gag bit…

- * - Years ago, when we still had signatures at the bottom of our posts, I displayed a link to this farm’s website. I proudly posted pics from National shows. Then a certain wingnut contacted the BO to complain to her about things I had posted and recommended that she fire me immediately for a long list of reasons. The BO was not amused by the poster’s demands but brushed it off… and I deleted any and all mentions of the farm. Never again. So that was not doxxing - as I had the info Out There…

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@BatCoach

@CurrentlyHorseless

Really? What “hell” was paid when Sdel attempted to out me as LKs sister?

She was not banned for attempting to doxx me.

Your rage would only be justified if you are LKs sister. You clearly aren’t, so why is Sdel’s harmless speculation so bothersome?

She was attempting to doxx me. She didn’t succeed, but her intention was to doxx. That’s obviously a hostile, nasty move.

I find your perspective most interesting given you just thought it was fine to repeat (for no reason) the real name you believe is @eggbutt and you did that just TODAY.

[smoofox]

@DownYonder

@smoofox

or flying in anything as lowly as an old Cessna 150.

Hey, don’t denigrate the Cessna 150. Humble as it may be, a heck of a lot of people learned to fly in one of those things - perhaps even Musk’s own pilot!

I have ridden in a few of them - once skimming over the tree tops in a sudden squall - but I cannot see Musk doing that!

[Ghazzu]