Thank you for your expertise. This area is outside my range of knowledge.
9 Likes
The Kanareks have responded to the revised subpoenas. The response was a motion to quash the subpoenas. That is a legal maneuver. The judge agreed by granting their previous motion to quash the first set of subpoenas
Why should the Kanareks jump through hoops set by the defense lawyers if they can get the subpoenas quashed?
Why should the Kanareks agree to unreasonable subpoena demands just to expedite the case rather than avail themselves of the legal options available to them?
The audio recordings have been available to everyone for months if not years.
From whom did you learn your rhetorical style of referring to opponents with belittling names? It always disgusted me when Tr***p did that. He probably thought he was being clever, too. Ick.
So, a broken, pathologically broken, family [edit] believes in a conspiracy theory enough to think they can sue people for money and get it. I for 9ne dont believe Lauren got any kind d of settlement from RC. She lies, and it’s not her father spewing Lauren isms from the IM username. People who believe in conspiracy theories can’t be reasoned with.
21 Likes
Interesting.
I totally believe that RC offered to settle with LK. RC never really had much wiggle room in terms of her role in the shooting, since she openly admitted to bringing the gun and handing it over to MB.
RC having settled with LK helps explain why all the legal
filing is being done by the lawyers for MB and SGF, but not by RCs lawyers.
1 Like
I thought they were supposed to respond to the revised subpoenas in ten days. Do I have that wrong? Why the delay? It seems like the Kanareks have no respect for the judge or the court.
Why should the Kanareks jump through these hoops? BECAUSE THEY WANT TO GET ALL THIS BOMBSHELL EVIDENCE INTO THE LEGAL RECORD.
Duh. You know this. Didn’t you see IM’s post about “someone” telling RC to bring her gun and get to NJ ASAP? Didn’t you see IM’s post about MB plotting to get the hay guy to do something terrible for him?
Of COURSE Daddio would want to help get any and all evidence related to this into the record, so Lollypop’s attorneys can reference it at trial… right?
And of COURSE Daddio should want to expedite Lollypop’s case. It’s a slam dunk… right? She won’t get paid until they get through discovery. Then, maybe MB will make a settlement offer. Or, maybe they will proceed to trial, where, according to you, Lollypop’s going to win big.
Why wouldn’t Lollypop want to hurry this whole thing along? Doesn’t she want “accountability” and a financial settlement?
And I can’t remember who first called La-La “Lollypop.” I found it fitting and hilarious though. Are you a humorless scold? Why would you take such offense to my use of nicknames? After all… you aren’t personally connected to anyone involved in this case.
25 Likes
If “someone” told RC to bring her gun to NJ, who was that person and what was said before and after that request? I ask because Barisone had guns on the property didn’t he? So many claims about conversations on recordings that Jonathan, Kirby, and Lauren refuse to turn over. How is that refusal going to help their case? Has all of this been a house of cards built on nothing?
This from one of JK’s rants those morning is interesting:
You also refuse to believe Barisone told me numerous times when LK wanted to leave and go back to NC……”North Carolina is where dressage dreams go to die.” (Bold = mine)
How confusing. LK wanted to go back to NC? When? Why didn’t she?
What a strange day.
Does anyone care what Barisone said about NC over 5 years ago? Was that comment illegal? Such immature comments from JK. He and his daughter are so much alike…insults, veiled threats, names, purely childish behavior which generally shows great stress and frustration by the person speaking or posting.
I sincerely hope Jonathan’s health is okay. His outburst this morning and the responses he received can’t be good for a man of his age.
16 Likes
An attorney who does not represent JK or KK made the motion to quash…after the deadline that they JK and Kk were supposed to respond to the subpoena. Why has it been done that way? Legally the wrong way.
It would seem to me that the person who initiated the law suit would want it to go forward as swiftly as possible. But they seem to be the ones putting up walls. Why?
And again, they may have the audios, but they do not have the transcript that KK, on this very bulletin board said she produced. Why can’t she turn that over?
So many questions, so few answers. Why?
32 Likes
Well, he seems to have checked on the forums about 1 hour ago. I mean… if it was actually him using the login associated with @Inigo-montoya . So… I think he’s doing alright.
It’s really kind of you to voice concerns over Jonathan’s health @eggbutt. I am sure he really appreciates that.
7 Likes
He would do the same for me, I’m sure! 
8 Likes
On an unrelated note, Jimmy Carter has entered Hospice care in his home.
11 Likes
They have responded. Their response was to file a motion that the subpoenas be quashed.
The Kanareks are suing because LK was badly injured. They are not suing because MB said scary things that they have recordings of. Getting the recordings into the legal record, even if MHG said “I’m going to effing kill her” may be salacious, but it doesn’t advance their suit for damages for injury one bit. All that matters is the fact (yes, fact) that Barisone shot her.
The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?
And how is subpoenaing something “getting it into the record”? Getting it into the record will come later when the trial starts. At that point, the admissibility and legality of the recordings will be litigated.
And no, I’m not personally connected with anyone in the case. No, I’m not a “humorless scold”.
You found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”? Do you think those nicknames are also “fitting and hilarious”? Do you find them clever?
Whether it’s Trump or you EIM types using the “nicknames”, it’s not so much that I’m offended. It’s more that I think that someone who had a valid comment or debating point would let their argument be carried by their valid points and not have to stoop to belittling nicknames.
Is it really that you find “Lollipop” or “Daddio” “hilarious”, or do you just enjoy the cheap put down? Part of the pleasure of hate?
Anyway, my point is that your use of that type of thing reflects on you. If that’s the image you’re going for for yourself, why not?
1 Like
If you have the actual audios, which are the original source, what is the purpose of the unofficial transcripts of the audios?
Apparently it is acceptable for the lawyer for the plaintiff to enter a motion to quash subpoenas issued to non party witnesses that he does not officially represent. The judge has not objected to it.
From now on, EIM, please use the formal, “LaLa Pop Rider” when refering to LK.
5 Likes
You have a reliable eye witness or forensic evidence?
20 Likes
Can I shorten it to “LaLaPop” ?
I think that will work.
That will be TOTALLY different than “Lollypop.”
11 Likes
I’m at a loss for words.
36 Likes
Well there you have it folks….
33 Likes
It’s amazing… isn’t it?
It’s like there is a gaslight flickering in the background as a hamster scrambles on its wheel.
Sigh. But what do I know… I keep on laughing at this nonsense and cracking jokes and using nicknames. Shame on me. 
16 Likes
That’s what they want….so the thread will get shut down…
11 Likes
It is important to see if the audio matches the typed transcript that KK produced and was sent to SS.
If it matches no harm no fowl.
If it does not match or is embellished or misquoted, then it is not verbatim nor accurate and therefore incorrect information has been given to SS to wrong MB
34 Likes
