Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[Sdel]

@Maria

If it does not match or is embellished or misquoted, then it is not verbatim nor accurate and therefore incorrect information has been given to SS to wrong MB

Which is part of his counterclaim and that is enough reason for the lawyers to demand it’s production, the court to affirm it’s being compelled in discovery, or enact sanctions upon failure to produce.

[Maria]

One of the legal eagles want to define Discovery for CH? And why exchanging evidence on behalf of both sides or all involved in the legal suit are supposed to adhere to Discovery. And why you are never supposed to ignore a subpoena.

Yea yea, I know it’s all been explained ten thousand times. Like different instructors explaining Half pass, one may explained it one way. Another may explained it the same way using different words. one version may hit home and make sense, thereby allowing the lightbulb to shine bright.

[Sdel]

@Maria

words. one version may hit home and make sense, thereby allowing the lightbulb to shine bright.

I think the shade is purposefully pulled down…

[Maria]

I am trying to be nice.

But…

Snicker, snort, snicker. Te he

[HoolieB]

As a few other posters noted, it is hard to believe ANYTHING out of that group.

I can’t remember if RC filed a counter claim against LK?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

Nope.

[HoolieB]

Ah. That’s a shame. Still doesn’t mean I believe there was an award/settlement/nuisance fee.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@Maria

One of the legal eagles want to define Discovery for CH? And why exchanging evidence on behalf of both sides or all involved in the legal suit are supposed to adhere to Discovery. And why you are never supposed to ignore a subpoena.

Oh… CH and IM are convinced they know everything already. They won’t want to listen to anything anyone has to say.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@HoolieB

Ah. That’s a shame. Still doesn’t mean I believe there was an award/settlement/nuisance fee.

It wouldn’t surprise me. Especially if RC was represented by lawyers from her insurance company. As other’s have said… someone somewhere did a calculation and decided it was worth paying a small settlement to make the issue go away entirely.

What I want to know is exactly how long after the ink was dry on that settlement agreement did Nagel and LK part ways?

[TwiSedai]

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@TwiSedai

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways

I’m pretty sure @currentlyhorseless brought up politics in her response to me in order to try and get an argument going.

Arguments get threads locked

There are plenty of threads in the current events forum if someone wants to talk about political nicknames. This thread is not about politics

[RMJacobs]

I have been behind on the most recently closed thread and this one for days. How dare y’all have this much fun without me? Harrumph.

I must say, my head is whirling with new developments. Who does this??? I guess the answer is, people who don’t learn anything from their past mistakes.

Rebecca

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated.

[LilRanger]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Kanareks have responded to the revised subpoenas. The response was a motion to quash the subpoenas.

I’m going to be pedantic here, but Mr and Mrs Kanarek have not responded to the subpoenas, LK has. They don’t have representation, so have simply not responded to any subpoenas. Lk’s attorney does not represent he Kanareks, only LK.

Will that matter? No se. But it’s not correct to say they responded.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated

They aren’t going to be able to dodge it forever…

[LilRanger]

[quote=“Virginia_Horse_Mom, post:1172, topic:782326”]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?
[/quote]

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated

They aren’t going to be able to dodge it forever

For people who live to file the lawsuit, they are hilariously unwilling to be defendants in one. What’s that saying. Live by the sword…

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@TwiSedai

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways

I’m pretty sure @currentlyhorseless brought up politics in her response to me in order to try and get an argument going.

Arguments get threads locked

There are plenty of threads in the current events forum if someone wants to talk about political nicknames. This thread is not about politics

i was making a point on the use of belittling nicknames as a rhetorical device in discussions, whether the discussions are political or non political in nature. It just happens that the most obvious historical example of the use of the technique was, well, you know.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

It’s really interesting to sit back and watch the blustering and freaking out at everyone on these forums today.

What just happened yesterday? Oh. That’s right. The judge is going to consider all these subpoena issues again.

I think LaLaPop and Dearest Father are feeling stressed and lashing out. And trying to comfort themselves by saying, “Well. We won something from RC.”

Sigh. I hope the judge rules soon. I’m super curious as to how it goes this time.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Maria

It is important to see if the audio matches the typed transcript that KK produced and was sent to SS.

If it matches no harm no fowl.

If it does not match or is embellished or misquoted, then it is not verbatim nor accurate and therefore incorrect information has been given to SS to wrong MB

Well, that depends. Did SS turn over all the material sent to them by LK, including any transcripts?

If SS turned over all the material sent to them, then one can check the transcripts sent to SS against the recordings to see if they match.

[eggbutt]

Apparently they hope to dodge it until someone gives up or runs out of money.