Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@TwiSedai

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways

I’m pretty sure @currentlyhorseless brought up politics in her response to me in order to try and get an argument going.

Arguments get threads locked

There are plenty of threads in the current events forum if someone wants to talk about political nicknames. This thread is not about politics

i was making a point on the use of belittling nicknames as a rhetorical device in discussions, whether the discussions are political or non political in nature. It just happens that the most obvious historical example of the use of the technique was, well, you know.

Yet I notice you say squat when IM demeans someone’s successful and long career, demeaning them to be a cleaning appliance and dust collector.

This tells me EXACTLY how you roll and how empty your comments actually are.

This in defense of a jobless cozener.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

i was making a point on the use of belittling nicknames as a rhetorical device in discussions, whether the discussions are political or non political in nature. It just happens that the most obvious historical example of the use of the technique was, well, you know.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated.

Plaintiffs lawyer has filed a motion to quash the second round of subpoenas, as the previous lawyer successfully moved with respect to the first round of subpoenas.

A civil suit with counter suit is an adversarial process, and this is part of the normal legal process. Why would you expect either side to drop any legal protections they have available to them?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated

They aren’t going to be able to dodge it forever…

No, the judge will make a ruling and the process will play out.

[eggbutt]

Where were the pearl clutches when “Eggbutt” was being changed into juvenile and silly alternatives? Who cares? I certainly didn’t make a deal about it for the majority of the time. It is strange now what twists some poster’s undies.

The hypocrisy of those demanding respectful behavior from most but not for all is not lost on me.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated.

Plaintiffs lawyer has filed a motion to quash the second round of subpoenas, as the previous lawyer successfully moved with respect to the first round of subpoenas.

A civil suit with counter suit is an adversarial process, and this is part of the normal legal process. Why would you expect either side to drop any legal protections they have available to them?

The subpoenaed parties filed NOTHING.

[Jenerationx]

@CurrentlyHorseless

If the person doing the recording has reason to suspect illegal activity would be discussed, in some cases otherwise illegal recording is sometimes rendered legal.

Not without a wire-tap warrant or a one party consent to the recording. Did MB or Tarshis or MHG or the Hay Guy consent to being recorded?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Plaintiffs lawyer has filed a motion to quash the second round of subpoenas, as the previous lawyer successfully moved with respect to the first round of subpoenas.

A civil suit with counter suit is an adversarial process, and this is part of the normal legal process. Why would you expect either side to drop any legal protections they have available to them?

Because IM told us all about all this evidence of plotting and premeditation that they have on these recordings! And then you went on to tell us that these recording were POSSIBLY legal. And then you went on to say the following:

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know I will fell some satisfaction, if not glee, when the trial ends with a large award or settlement to LK.

So given all this… why again are JK and KK trying to avoid turning over the discoverable materials requested?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

Where were the pearl clutches when “Eggbutt” was being changed into juvenile and silly alternatives? Who cares? I certainly didn’t make a deal about it for the majority of the time. It is strange now what twists some poster’s undies.

The hypocrisy of those demanding respectful behavior from most but not for all is not lost on me.

LOL. I don’t “demand” anything from you, @Eggbutt, certainly I don’t demand respectful behavior.

I brought up the well known nicknames applied to political candidates because I think almost everyone has the same visceral reaction to them. It up to you whether you want to adopt that rhetorical style, or not.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@TwiSedai

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways

I’m pretty sure @currentlyhorseless brought up politics in her response to me in order to try and get an argument going.

Arguments get threads locked

There are plenty of threads in the current events forum if someone wants to talk about political nicknames. This thread is not about politics

i was making a point on the use of belittling nicknames as a rhetorical device in discussions, whether the discussions are political or non political in nature. It just happens that the most obvious historical example of the use of the technique was, well, you know.

Yet I notice you say squat when IM demeans someone’s successful and long career, demeaning them to be a cleaning appliance and dust collector.

This tells me EXACTLY how you roll and how empty your comments actually are.

This in defense of a jobless cozener.

I have the same reaction to the use of belittling nicknames used as a rhetorical device whether it is coming from members of the EIM, from LK or IM, or from politicians.

BTW, one definition of “jock sniffer” is just “someone who idolizes a star athlete.”

It was not a term I was familiar with, and googled it. Of course there are other, nastier definitions.

Unlike you I’m not clutching my pearls. I’m going to have fun with it at precise moments of hilarity. You however, fool no one but yourself as it seems you consider yourself as being rather clever.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated.

Plaintiffs lawyer has filed a motion to quash the second round of subpoenas, as the previous lawyer successfully moved with respect to the first round of subpoenas.

A civil suit with counter suit is an adversarial process, and this is part of the normal legal process. Why would you expect either side to drop any legal protections they have available to them?

The subpoenaed parties filed NOTHING.

So?

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The subpoenaed material would only aid MBs counterclaim - why would the Kanareks hand over material to aid MBs counterclaim if they have legal options to get the subpoenas quashed?

Very interesting for multiple reasons. And here folks is the crux of the case. So this evidence would bruise the Kanarek and THAT is why subpoenas are being violated.

Plaintiffs lawyer has filed a motion to quash the second round of subpoenas, as the previous lawyer successfully moved with respect to the first round of subpoenas.

A civil suit with counter suit is an adversarial process, and this is part of the normal legal process. Why would you expect either side to drop any legal protections they have available to them?

The subpoenaed parties filed NOTHING.

So?

So the judge may rule the motioning party has no standing to do so.

I get that your friends play slippery games in life and that you respect that but if I were you I’d prepare for their comeuppance. There’s always a price to pay.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

The subpoenaed parties filed NOTHING.

So?

So they never responded to their subpoenas, Silly!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@TwiSedai

@CurrentlyHorseless

found the nickname “Lollypop” “fitting and hilarious”? What did you think about “Little Marco”, “Adam Schitt”, “Crooked Hillary”, and “Sleepy Joe”?

I mean, I for one think all the political names are pretty dumb, but I think Lollypop is hilarious. And pretty sure LaLaPop is supposed to be a play on Lollypop anyways

I’m pretty sure @currentlyhorseless brought up politics in her response to me in order to try and get an argument going.

Arguments get threads locked

There are plenty of threads in the current events forum if someone wants to talk about political nicknames. This thread is not about politics

i was making a point on the use of belittling nicknames as a rhetorical device in discussions, whether the discussions are political or non political in nature. It just happens that the most obvious historical example of the use of the technique was, well, you know.

Yet I notice you say squat when IM demeans someone’s successful and long career, demeaning them to be a cleaning appliance and dust collector.

This tells me EXACTLY how you roll and how empty your comments actually are.

This in defense of a jobless cozener.

I have the same reaction to the use of belittling nicknames used as a rhetorical device whether it is coming from members of the EIM, from LK or IM, or from politicians.

BTW, one definition of “jock sniffer” is just “someone who idolizes a star athlete.”

It was not a term I was familiar with, and googled it. Of course there are other, nastier definitions.

Unlike you I’m not clutching my pearls. I’m going to have fun with it at precise moments of hilarity. You however, fool no one but yourself as it seems you consider yourself as being rather clever.

@Knights_Mom

I’m not interested in whether you think I’m clever. I’m even less interested in whether you think I “consider myself as being” clever.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

The subpoenaed parties filed NOTHING.

So?

So they never responded to their subpoenas, Silly!

https://media1.giphy.com/media/HHp5GPMG5PwHu/giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7b2krebjsvt6s673kzjetucre2tdr4fd01q0g1ras&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

No, but plaintiffs lawyer responded with a motion to quash the subpoenas even though (gasp) plaintiffs lawyer is not officially representing the non parties.

It seems that was acceptable to the judge on the first round of quashed subpoenas.

So, again, I ask why it matters that the motion to quash was filed by someone other than the recipients of the subpoenas, as long as it was filed?

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

It seems that was acceptable to the judge on the first round of quashed subpoenas.

It is possible that the previous judge acted incorrectly.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

No, but plaintiffs lawyer responded with a motion to quash the subpoenas even though (gasp) plaintiffs lawyer is not officially representing the non parties.

It seems that was acceptable to the judge on the first round of quashed subpoenas.

So, again, I ask why it matters that the motion to quash was filed by someone other than the recipients of the subpoenas, as long as it was filed?

New judge this time.

Do you think this judge will agree to allow this issue with LKs lawyer filing motions on their behalf again? I guess that’s possible…

But, in the long run, sooner or later I think they are still going to have to answer subpoenas and provide discoverable materials…

[eggbutt]

Aren’t you the one preaching to others about not using Lauren’s alter name?

[Ambitious_Kate]

I have often thought that if - IF - MB told RC to bring her gun, he suggested it as protection, in the context of if he was saying she needed to come up here to watch her horse(s) she should bring her gun because he didn’t know what these freaks of nature were going to do. Unwise, but possible. However, after hearing her testimony, it sounded to me like she brought it herself for protection. And I don’t see what makes putting it in a safe when she got here so guilty of something nefarious. Is her crime anything other than bringing a gun over state lines? I ask becasue I don’t know.

And before you get all excited and post a response, Clueless, I’m not asking you.

[Jenerationx]