Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[erinmeri]

@eggbutt

@erinmeri did you mean to reply to my Teddy Ruxpin comment?

No. For some reason when I replied to HH, it showed as replying to you. But the post and quote were so long that I didn’t delete and repost. Sorry!

[eggbutt]

No problem at all, and I admire your patience in responding to CH.

[erinmeri]

@eggbutt

No problem at all, and I admire your patience in responding to CH.

Thanks for understanding! I am all COTH’d out now. I think have hit my limit of watching two people repeatedly argue (wrongly!)… with a lawyer. No more longeing from me. Mea culpa!

Anyone have any good Netflix recommendations?

[eggbutt]

@erinmeri

Anyone have any good Netflix recommendations?

Binge Wednesday!

[erinmeri]

@eggbutt

Binge Wednesday!

Already finished it! May rewatch though. Sooo good!

[DownYonder]

@erinmeri

Anyone have any good Netflix recommendations?

Have you watched The Queen’s Gambit? It’s about an actual chess whiz (not a real life chess whiz but it was supposedly inspired by Bobby Fischer’s life).

[erinmeri]

@DownYonder

Have you watched The Queen’s Gambit? It’s about an actual chess whiz (not a real life chess whiz but it was supposedly inspired by Bobby Fischer’s life).

I haven’t!! On my list for ages. Thanks for the reminder!!

[cheval_convert]

Rescued by Ruby and/or The Railway Man. Both based on true stories.

[Knights_Mom]

@lazaret

Whistleblowing has no bearing on proving the alleged activity. A recording might provide information, but it’s not evidence. I explained this above but also, Sarbanes-Oxley empowers the SEC to exercise specific enforcement rights against personnel who voluntarily participate in the activities the SEC regulates. It has zero bearing on what two private citizens can do with respect to litigation between themselves.

I believe they are in search of a narrative that would render LKs illegal recordings legitimate. I also believe that should such a scenario come to exist here that legitimizes them, we’d see it in filings tomorrow as the premise for those recordings.

[hut-ho78]

@lazaret

Whistleblowing has no bearing on proving the alleged activity. A recording might provide information, but it’s not evidence. I explained this above but also, Sarbanes-Oxley empowers the SEC to exercise specific enforcement rights against personnel who voluntarily participate in the activities the SEC regulates. It has zero bearing on what two private citizens can do with respect to litigation between themselves.

Thank you.

[Knights_Mom]

@Dragonfly90

I am just catching up. RC gave her gun for “safekeeping” to a man that was noticeably on his way to a breakdown due to the stress of the conflict, among other things. LK deserved a settlement for RC’s illegal actions in bringing the gun into NJ and poor decision handing it to MB. For RC’s part in this tragedy the amount is appropriate, IMO. I guess it is all relative but I don’t consider that amount, while not a big payout, chump change( must be some very wealthy people here).

The gun was put in a safe.

Facts matter.

[eggbutt]

Not sure which network, but The Menu is amazing!

[hut-ho78]

@Knights_Mom

@lazaret

Whistleblowing has no bearing on proving the alleged activity. A recording might provide information, but it’s not evidence. I explained this above but also, Sarbanes-Oxley empowers the SEC to exercise specific enforcement rights against personnel who voluntarily participate in the activities the SEC regulates. It has zero bearing on what two private citizens can do with respect to litigation between themselves.

I believe they are in search of a narrative that would render LKs illegal recordings legitimate. I also believe that should such a scenario come to exist here that legitimizes them, we’d see it in filings tomorrow as the premise for those recordings.

I would be the most surprised person here if the lawyers for the Kanareks followed my posts as any kind of legal guide.

[erinmeri]

Thanks, @cheval_convert & @eggbutt! Feel free to keep suggestions coming. I am very overwhelmed by all the choices and disappointed by some of the ones I have picked recently! (Plus it will hopefully keep me off the longe line!)

[MHM]

@lazaret

I routinely wonder, in the case that there are oddly specific rules announced, what exactly someone did to result in that rule.

That reminds me of a picture of a sign I see posted periodically that says no horses are allowed in the washroom. I don’t know where it’s from, but there must be a reason for it. Lol.

[eggbutt]

Well, since IM and his wife don’t seem to have legal representation, maybe he’s been searching here for anything you and CH can come up with that he can throw at the wall. /s

[eggbutt]

We have been binging Mayor of Knightstown. Outstanding but definitely intense.

[Dragonfly90]

MB’s safe apparently wasn’t very safe. Facts matter.

[Knights_Mom]

@Dragonfly90

MB’s safe apparently wasn’t very safe. Facts matter.

Nothing and no one was safe at HH under LKs reign of terror, plotting, illegal surveillance and misdeeds.

All she had to do is leave, and contain her gurgling raw emotions until such time that she vacated.

Facts matter.

[Knights_Mom]

Talk about not being able to control oneself!