Ahhh, but of course! Handy little excuse, 'eh?
2 Likes
I just did my Safe Sport renewal recently.
It didn’t take that long, so it’s not much of an excuse.
4 Likes
The renewals don’t take long, unless you have done enough refresher cycles that you have to re-do the 90-minute core course again. I had to do it on my last renewal. That was a surprise.
3 Likes
I don’t have my reading glasses on and at first glance thought you said “stinks” as opposed to sticks.
3 Likes
Oh poor @CurrentlyHorseless, the movie in your head jammed up in the player again. You are so off base. Give me a bit to write out why, ok @CurrentlyHorseless?
While I am responding to your incorrect post, have you thought about that whole situation where @Inigo-montoya, Jonathan Kanarek did not comply with a court order? @CurrentlyHorseless, doesn’t that seem so weird for someone who is a lawyer?
15 Likes
2 Likes
I was thinking about it @CurrentlyHorseless, and instead of typing out all the ways this is so wrong, and providing, like always, the facts to prove you are wrong, I am wondering how do you know what SGF and Mr. Silver are thinking? Were you there?
Isn’t that your requirement @CurrentlyHorseless?
Also, @CurrentlyHorseless, have you heard Robert Guy Goodwin/Jim E Stark/Sumperman’s audio about the videos? Have you seen the videos? Where you, @CurrentlyHorseless, there when Robert Guy Goodwin made the recordings or the videos were made?
You really do need to get the movie player in your head looked at @CurrentlyHorseless. It is not working so well right now. It has never worked great, but right now it is totally malfunctioning.
27 Likes
It doesn’t surprise me that you’ve declined to go to the effort of typing out “all the ways” my post is “so wrong”, @trubandloki, but have nevertheless responded to the post. Twice! LOL.
2 Likes
Most likely he has left the bench. Any age extension is not long term.
2 Likes
Laugh.
Thank you for the laugh.
So your rules do not apply to you, is that what you are saying @CurrentlyHorseless? You, @CurrentlyHorseless are the one who insisted that unless a person was there to know exactly what happened they can not comment, right?
Do you really want to know why you are wrong, beside the whole point that you are making things up that are not right?
@CurrentlyHorseless, how about Jonathan Kanarek @Inigo-montoya ignoring a court order?
16 Likes
I guess if you can’t be famous, be infamous?
Understood, most people would rather be successful and respected rather than outrageous and notorious, but I guess not all…
18 Likes
For the win.
11 Likes
And today’s winner of the Interwebz are @trubandloki and @FitzE!!!
One with logical, spot on points and the other with a wicked sense of humor!
Kudos ladies, kudos!!!
11 Likes
TOM COREA
You nailed it!
You totally nailed it.
5 Likes
I had never heard of him so looked it up - and this doesn’t even appear to discuss the horse craziness! (Got a link?)
The documents are embedded. Stealing $386,000 in 1993 from his grandfather appears to have been his version of a kickstarter campaign.
3 Likes
I believe the crisis is worldwide. Mental health care has lagged so far behind ‘physical’ health care (or whatever we should call the rest of it, trying not to buy into mind-body dualism). In research, treatments, innovations, breakthroughs - it is rooted in its 19th century origins and confined by the thinking of past times.
The tragic part of stories like MB’s here, apart from the large numbers of people experiencing the same awful thing, is that there are no clear criteria for declaring someone well enough to be released. And the committees that oversee deliberations about release often include people who have personal grudges or are convinced that “never” is the best release date. There is also often an ugly economic incentive to keep people confined.
With cancer, we have the clean scans and the 5-year NED. With mental health problems, nothing remotely comparable. People are challenged to show mental recovery in circumstances that would make us all act and feel mentally ill. It’s terrible.
This situation is as bad or worse in Great Britain, China, many African countries, Russia, many South American countries, Mexico…I think Australia and New Zealand have some real progress to show, though.
11 Likes
It would seem from a legal aspect, the co-owners showing the degree of control over the farm’s day to day business (to the extent that MB did not have the authority to let LK stay there), yet showing the co-owners did not having actual knowledge she was there, maybe in tension with each other?
Isn’t there likely a paper trail of a co-ownership business agreement, pattern (or lack) of involvement in the daily business or larger projects, who signed boarding agreements, etc.? If there is nothing written (maybe that is how everyone rolled) I would think co-owners need to show a pattern of control and decision making as co-owners. It is always interesting to see how lawyers build a case–Would MB and LK lawyers be both trying to establish MB was authorized to let her stay there??(Or is there an advantage for co-owners to be united on this front?
1 Like
Had to Google him, the name sort of rings a bell, but I wasn’t following AQHA goings on as much in 2013 so must have missed most of the goings on.
1 Like
He jumped into breeding and showing quarter horse with both feet a year or two before he was found out to be a fraud. All of the magazines had big spreads on him. I think Chronicle and gohorseshow still have articles up.
If my memory serves me correctly he tried to start a futurity type thing as well. He was also quoted about things like the politics of showing and how he supported that type of thing. Pay to play and all. His comments were not even veiled.
2 Likes
