Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

Oh for sure everything will come out. And LKs hand in all of this will be weighed and measured. Just like in this criminal case I’m citing below:


7 Likes

Hahaha. Very useful term. Especially for a middle class heroin addict who loves to present as a badass and has a crime adjacent live in boyfriend.

18 Likes

Well that’s Alabama. Got to protect those gun nuts.

4 Likes

Oooooh… a trip down Memory Lane… across multiple forums and FB pages…

2 Likes

Ha! I didn’t even think about the whole psychological projection angle …

And he’s not just crime adjacent. He’s got a lengthy rap sheet. And she knows it.

10 Likes

Yeah they’re rabid just like property owners and business owners in New Jersey. You know the type of people who crazily don’t like to see the fruits of their blood, sweat and tears go to jobless, drug addict grifters who engage in a campaign of terrorist finishing the bastard.

So there’s that.

Besides, you clearly missed the point of that article which illustrates the victims behavior finding her culpable for sustaining her injury AND prosecuting her for harm done to another due to that behavior.

21 Likes

I don’t think talking insurance means anything about being desperate. It’s normal for insurance to come into play when defending someone’s actions. Topics on these threads tend to focus on one thing for a time then switch to another.

I for one find the insurance bit interesting as it’s my line of work. Nothing deeper about it.

I find the insurance discussions interesting and informative as well.

I only sense desperation coming from certain parties who are participating in the insurance discussions. Frankly, you aren’t one of them who is coming across that way right now, in my opinion. :slight_smile: :woman_shrugging:

6 Likes

The GFM donations speak for themselves.

20 Likes

Not to bring another contentious topic into the discussion, but the authorities in Alabama were also advancing the idea of a fetus being a murder victim.

Edited to add: The charges against the pregnant woman were dropped.

8 Likes

:clap::clap::clap:

2 Likes

If you think it’s ok to shoot a pregnant woman except for self defense fine. I mean maybe she is also a terrible person so deserved it. I am very clear on how you feel about justifying gun violence. And I did not miss the “point” of the article…I just think it is wrong…blaming a gunshot victim…how was she to know the person would shoot her and kill her baby. Where does this stop where the use of a gun is ok if the person shot made you mad/frustrated enough. You not only get shot but are now responsible for being shot. I guess now if you cut someone off in traffic and they shoot you it really is your fault.
Anyway, moving on.

3 Likes

This is definitely a significant issue that varies state by state, and tends to depend on the stage of gestation, and whether the baby could have survived if born. But there are many examples when people are charged with double homicide, etc, if they commit a crime on a pregnant woman, and both mother and baby die.

I believe that was the case with Scott Petersen in California… He was convicted of the second degree murder of his unborn son, Connor Peterson, who would have been viable if born at that stage of gestation.

This Alabama case is pretty tough and extreme, however, in that they were charging the mother of the unborn child with a crime leading to the child’s death. But it’s Alabama.

3 Likes

Revisiting the whole “MB was under insured” argument.

If SGF is the LLC that owned the farmhouse, and MB was both a member/owner of the LLC related to SGF… how exactly does one arrive at the conclusion that there is any sort of issue with a “non-owner” taking out insurance on that farmhouse?

Then there is the issue of renter’s insurance. Are you, @CurrentlyHorseless , making the case that MB should have carried renters insurance, as he was living on the property (first at the farmhouse, and later in the barn living quarters)? If he had renters insurance, would that insurance have actually covered anything related to a gunshot situation on the property? From what I understand, renters insurance is different in many respects from homeowners insurance.

5 Likes

Nice try. OK not really. You really jumped overboard on that one, didn’t you?!

Show me where I said it was OK to shoot someone.

Plus, I didn’t take sides or comment on the article other than to point out how the criminal justice system may interpret things and what actions they may take.

The rest of your statement continues along Ludicrous Lane and its just not worth the travel.

LK is suing MB for allegedly shooting her and due to past performance and results in a courtroom, and due to the weakness of the case, and her documented behavior it just may be a huge miscalculation on her part.

We shall see.

21 Likes

And the poster wasn’t even using it recently. Almost like it was recognized as an alter when a different user was banned….

5 Likes

Oh, honestly, she doesn’t care about facts. @CurrentlyHorseless has had an agenda of writing baloney from the outset, based on made up ideas fed her. You can tell what the K’s agenda is based on what @CurrentlyHorseless fixated on. These days it appears that they are counting on SGF is insured and they are going to get a big payout from an insurance company, and that’s going to be their big win.

20 Likes

I hear you.

I just want to see if she really is going to try and make the argument that MB should have renters insurance, and that somehow THAT would have solved any liability conundrum that anyone involved in this mess is currently contemplating.

3 Likes

And they seem to be the only ones in the theater to be watching that particular movie.

Everyone else is watching the impending crash and shouting “Pull up! Pull up!”

16 Likes

LK has filed a civil suit for damages related to her injuries from being shot by MB. Civil suits are about money.

What part of that basic characteristic of a civil suit do you find confusing?

Did you expect LK to say ‘Oh, I was nearly killed by my trainer, but I won’t bother suing because I’m so stinking rich I don’t need the money?’

A civil suit is the legal means of settling scores if you’ve been wronged. Shooting someone is not.

2 Likes