Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

[Ambitious_Kate]

Oh, Lauren. You foolish child.

[skydy]

@BigMama1

How nice. Somebody has houseguests for the holidays! I hope they have favourite recipes to share because that’s what the topic is now.

It’s so odd that the LK team complains about people talking about her, yet as soon as the conversation doesn’t revolve around her one of the team members immediately drags it back.

Let’s stick to recipes until there is new info please. It’s way more pleasant and a much more productive use of everyone’s time.

I love to cook, but I can only eat so much.

Was responding to a horse related post? but it’s a rather pointless endeavor on this thread…

[trubandloki]

@LaughingLina

@Danvers

Word down in Welly World is that LaLa has approached BNT’s and was told there is no room in their barn(s)… and PapaPopRider is sending Nastygrams to said BNT’s… doesn’t look like the PopRiders are welcome in Welly World…

That is your dream, perhaps. Sorry, everything else posted here by those who clearly have no lives, outside of this forum, can be ignored. Not this, though. Lauren has had the same exact trainer for 4 seasons every season, and excellent back up for when her coach returns overseas in late March. She has never and will never replace him. He’s like an American BNT- except with real talent. (And a real “BNT.”)

The trainers he provides her off season have proven to be worth every penny, every summer. Perhaps, those from which you receive “word,” just are not very well informed. Which is weird, given the “tightness,” of the “community.”

Last, props to CH! When Sdel finally posted one single true thing: “either LK checked yes, or a SafeSport employee did,” it was CH who caught that! Of course, she was then accused of making things up & the usual nonsense. Though, it was Sdel who got it right, in her second half of the phrase. How could Lauren “check,” a box via phone call? That’s just ridiculous.

SafeSport decides what their summaries read & whether or not they feel minors could be in danger. Lauren isn’t an authorized organization to make such judgments. SafeSport could have simply decided the environment at the time, wasn’t safe. That would constitute neglect, I suppose, as CPS testified was their reason for showing up. Lauren neither “checked,” yes or “said,” yes, to any questions directly or indirectly involving abuse of minors. The complaint was for bullying & harassment. Possibly homophobia/homophobic remarks, (edited to add: body shaming of larger sized persons though) I couldn’t rightly say.

Unfortunately, the CBS lady lied. As I recall, CPS and CBS were both present in court. CBS heard CPS testify as to the reason they were there. It did not include “verbal abuse.” Another unfortunate lie, told by CBS lady. If I had to wager, as KnightsMom did re Barisone “being released by Christmas,” I would wager all answers provided by Lauren regarding minors were something like “No. Not that I have ever seen.” Takers? This is a much safer bet than knightsmom’s incorrect assertion.

You are welcome to make up fairytales, no one cares to stop you. We all just felt CH should be given props, not attacks, for catching Sdel’s one phrase of truth. Correct, @Sdel it was SafeSport, indeed who filled out the summary card of the summary report. It is clear you knew that already, though. Sadly, so did CBS.

To whom it concerns: Lauren has no intention of replacing her trainers with any other “trainers.” If you are reading this, you know who you are and Danvers is, as per usual, grievously misinformed. I highly recommend asking your peers about this accusation, then requesting they “show their work.” Doubtlessly, you know this to be untrue. Im assuming other trainers know your situation and yours are toes they would surely not step on.

To clarify the whole trainer thing, I am wondering does that mean AW is just “filling in “ for Ulf?

I personally am glad to hear that you feel like your training is going well and you are fully enjoying your horses.

Edit to add an R to end of one of the yous so it is your.

[Pocket_Rocket]

I have a feeling that La La Laughing Lina won’t be outstaying her welcome.

What a frenzied little parable!

[OntheFnce]

Some people just can’t help themselves.

[Angela_Freda]

@LaughingLina

That is your dream, perhaps. Sorry, everything else posted here by those who clearly have no lives, outside of this forum, can be ignored. Not this, though. Lauren has had the same exact trainer for 4 seasons every season, and excellent back up for when her coach returns overseas in late March. She has never and will never replace him. He’s like an American BNT- except with real talent. (And a real “BNT.”)

The trainers he provides her off season have proven to be worth every penny, every summer. Perhaps, those from which you receive “word,” just are not very well informed. Which is weird, given the “tightness,” of the “community.”

Last, props to CH! When Sdel finally posted one single true thing: “either LK checked yes, or a SafeSport employee did,” it was CH who caught that! Of course, she was then accused of making things up & the usual nonsense. Though, it was Sdel who got it right, in her second half of the phrase. How could Lauren “check,” a box via phone call? That’s just ridiculous.

SafeSport decides what their summaries read & whether or not they feel minors could be in danger. Lauren isn’t an authorized organization to make such judgments. SafeSport could have simply decided the environment at the time, wasn’t safe. That would constitute neglect, I suppose, as CPS testified was their reason for showing up. Lauren neither “checked,” yes or “said,” yes, to any questions directly or indirectly involving abuse of minors. The complaint was for bullying & harassment. Possibly homophobia/homophobic remarks, (edited to add: body shaming of larger sized persons though) I couldn’t rightly say.

Unfortunately, the CBS lady lied. As I recall, CPS and CBS were both present in court. CBS heard CPS testify as to the reason they were there. It did not include “verbal abuse.” Another unfortunate lie, told by CBS lady. If I had to wager, as KnightsMom did re Barisone “being released by Christmas,” I would wager all answers provided by Lauren regarding minors were something like “No. Not that I have ever seen.” Takers? This is a much safer bet than knightsmom’s incorrect assertion.

You are welcome to make up fairytales, no one cares to stop you. We all just felt CH should be given props, not attacks, for catching Sdel’s one phrase of truth. Correct, @Sdel it was SafeSport, indeed who filled out the summary card of the summary report. It is clear you knew that already, though. Sadly, so did CBS.

To whom it concerns: Lauren has no intention of replacing her trainers with any other “trainers.” If you are reading this, you know who you are and Danvers is, as per usual, grievously misinformed. I highly recommend asking your peers about this accusation, then requesting they “show their work.” Doubtlessly, you know this to be untrue. Im assuming other trainers know your situation and yours are toes they would surely not step on.

So much for moving on and getting on with your best life ever…

That “show your work” is a favorite of hers.

[Ambitious_Kate]

Ooh, she’s really trying to re-write that whole CPS thing. Could she be getting in trouble for false reporting to CPS? And denying that she was the one who filled out the SS form? That’s pretty bold, when its so easy to prove exactly who did for any attorneys that care. It must be really boiling over for her. You can tell when she’s really in trouble based on what she “protests about” the most. Poor thing. So much coming back to bite her. Not over yet, me thinks.

But - I thought Ulf and Co. weren’t training her any more. If so, who is it that’s training her.

[trubandloki]

@Ambitious_Kate

Ooh, she’s really trying to re-write that whole CPS thing. Could she be getting in trouble for false reporting to CPS? And denying that she was the one who filled out the SS form? That’s pretty bold, when its so easy to prove exactly who did. It must be really boiling over for her. You can tell when she’s really in trouble based on what she “protests about” the most. Poor thing. So much coming back to bite her. Not over yet, me thinks.

Well, like all things Lauren has posted on the internet, there is a very tiny bit of truth here.

From what I remember, Lauren reported over the phone and someone from SS filled out the form. So technically Lauren is hanging her hat on the fact that she herself did not check the box, that this person at SS did it.

Now, all of us logical people know that the person from SS who checked the box did it because they asked Lauren the question and she answered it, they applied her answer.
But… In the world of twisting things to work in a 53D chess game where the blame is never you, the ability to say that she did not actually check the box is all that matters.

[Maria]

Nothing like checking here early on my way to meet the farrier, goodness

And

YAWN

[Ambitious_Kate]

@trubandloki

Now, all of us logical people know that the person from SS who checked the box did it because they asked Lauren the question and she answered it, they applied her answer.
But… In the world of twisting things to work in a 53D chess game where the blame is never you, the ability to say that she did not actually check the box is all that matters.

Good grief. How could she possibly have made a report to Safe Sport, yet denie the accusations to Safe Sport? Where in her tiny mind does that sort its self out?

[trubandloki]

@Ambitious_Kate

@trubandloki

Now, all of us logical people know that the person from SS who checked the box did it because they asked Lauren the question and she answered it, they applied her answer.
But… In the world of twisting things to work in a 53D chess game where the blame is never you, the ability to say that she did not actually check the box is all that matters.

Good grief. How could she possibly have made a report to Safe Sport, yet denie the accusations to Safe Sport? Where in her tiny mind does that sort its self out?

We are talking about Lauren. The same person who decided to Finish the Bastard when he did not want to train her anymore.
The same person who will make this (clearly imaginary) list of horribleness associated with training with Michael but then will refuse to leave.

In other words, she has been shown to not be the most logical person on the planet, she has also admitted under oath that she lies to get her own way, so…

[yaya]

How to give your new lawyer a migraine.

[K_VanOlst]

So part of me wants to tag Mod1 because this is so pathetically transparently obviously Lauren, and she was banned for a reason, but a much larger part of me is reaching for the popcorn and imagining her new lawyer’s headache lol. Can’t wait to see whatever in the civil suit prompted this hissy fit!

[trubandloki]

Hey @LaughingLina, what is the story behind the lawyer change in the civil case?

[MHM]

@trubandloki

Hey @LaughingLina, what is the story behind the lawyer change in the civil case?

Maybe the old lawyer returned to Europe and set her up with a fabulous new lawyer in Florida. Lol.

[LexInVA]

Don’t forget to screenshot everything. Save it early and save it often.

[eggbutt]

The raging narcissist has returned. Someone must have gotten a new device for Christmas-Hanukkah and has a new IP address.

I wonder if this new personality has anything to contribute to the main topic or recipes? Few here care about Lauren Kanarek anymore. What she does, where she is, who she is with is actually irrelevant. She is a nobody starving for attention and some sort of success at something without putting in one iota of effort.

This new poster should take CH and HH and start a new thread extolling the virtues and significant, positive accomplishments of Miss Kanarek. Oh darn, it would be a very short thread I suspect.

I’m glad “Lina” has a sense of humor and is “laughing” - she’s gonna need it.

[MHM]

@eggbutt

This new poster should take CH and HH and start a new thread extolling the virtues and significant, positive accomplishments of Miss Kanarek. Oh darn, it would be a very short thread I suspect.

Oh, I don’t know about that.

Given the “inventiveness” (was that the word Mr. Mustache used in the trial?) and the tendency for endless repetition, that thread could go on for a very long time. Lol.

[eggbutt]

You know, you are so right!

[eggbutt]

Time for an eggbuttism -