That’s EXACTLY what I thought! 
12 Likes
Musings on a Friday morning.
I find it quite interesting how a certain poster keeps shifting the target for their animosity. First it was MB, then it was MHG, then LO, and now Mr. Deininger. Who will they target next to smear, disparage, vilify, denigrate? Boyd? Ali? Mr. Davidson aka Hay Guy? 
It will be even more interesting to learn what said poster has to say about Judge Taylor when he finally releases MB. Or about the new judge if/when he issues decisions against the K-Klan.
19 Likes
Trademark Heeler side eye 
5 Likes
Don’t forget eggbutt, Sdel, FitzE, and Knights_Mom. Honestly, it’s getting so you can’t tell the players without a program.
13 Likes
The reading comprehension problem is yours. @eggbutt. You responded to a post by Maria in which she was responding to my post and to me.
Your pretending that the statement not about me is dishonest.
eggbutt, correct me if I am wrong, but were you not talking about the K’s?
16 Likes
How is it a “defensive leap” to say I’m not a liar? I asked @Eggbutt to show one example of what she considered a lie, and she backs off and claims, dishonestly, that she wasn’t talking about me.
Re bolded. Not true.
1 Like
I have hardly disparaged LO. I said I admired her and referred to her as a saint.
I don’t like Christopher Deininger because
- suing the police and public authorities in Morristown was a travesty. The police saved lives, possibly including Barisone’s.
- he has lied, and the lies are consequential ones.
I respect Judge Taylor and will continue to do so regardless of his decision on the upcoming hearing.
You (g) certainly cannot be accused of “shifting the target of your animosity”!
1 Like
Who were you talking about when you responded to my post asking me how I knew Deininger was dishonest, @Maria?
1 Like
The Hay Guy would be the absolute last straw. So to speak.
His extensive online fan club would rise up with a vengeance!
25 Likes
Sorry MHM.
I was asking you what proof you have that Mr. D is dishonest. Granted my thumbs got in the way of correct spelling in my initial ask, but I think most got it.
10 Likes
Hmmm….the anger lately……
Is that deposition date coming up really soon? Did GAS decline to argue against the contempt/compels for Mommy and Daddy?
Is he suggesting to them that they turn over the discovery requested by the subpoenas?
19 Likes
Yes, I did understand you were asking for proof Mr Deininger was dishonest. @Eggbutt responded to your post, clearly referring to me, by saying you should keep in mind that “they” are dishonest.
Her accusation of dishonesty did not mention a name or screen name but clearly referred to me.
1 Like
Out of curiosity… Why would GAS agree to represent them at this point?
Let’s say he did take the case on a contingency basis (I still think that’s doubtful)… why in the world would he agree to spend hours representing those two, trying to deal with outstanding issues related to the subpoenas?
5 Likes
Ok, so what proof do you, CurrentlyHorseless, have that Mr. D is dishonest?
16 Likes
I respect the law and the office, but not the man who uses his status as a judge to disregard the law.
27 Likes
Every part of me is just screaming that this would not be a case to take on a contingency basis. Lol.
5 Likes
Why did Nagel file motions to quash (late I might add) last time as Lauren Kanarek’s lawyer not Jonathan or Kirby Kanarek’s lawyer?
6 Likes
