Mini Rolexes??

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JER:
(taking time out from my exotic, exciting life to respond to Robby…)

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Blyth doesn’t take his horses to a novice competition until they can add strides significantly between two poles on the ground. At the clinic I organized, we set the poles at, I think, six strides. He was really surprised that only one Intermediate rider (out of five groups; 2 OI, 2 OP, 1 OT) could get more than 10 strides between the poles.

Teaching the horse to adjust - lengthen and shorten - at the canter is what I now consider the core of cross-country riding. So Rhodey will not be going out until he can adjust between poles on the ground. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

But Robby, when Blyth says ‘Novice’ he’s talking about UK Novice, which is 3’6" and allowed to be quite technical (bounces, corners et al.).

I’m not sure a horse needs the same degree of lengthening/compressing skill to jump around a US Novice course, but I do agree adjustment needs to be there by Prelim, which is more or less the equivalent to UK Novice. I can think of exactly one N course out here that has a combination that requires some forethought – a long gallop to a short two stride with a rollback turn after – other than that, you find nothing but single fences spread out over the track.

Also, adjustment at US Novice can be a simple transition from canter to trot – this can allow a better set up for the fence. Getting the 6-10 stride adjustment in canter can take a while in a young or green horse because it does require strength and balance, and you have to develop a steady, rhythmic, forward canter first. Asking a horse to compress his stride when he’s not ready for it can be a very frustrating thing for the horse.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I almost put my disclaimer in when I posted that originally - that I know UK Novice is basically US Prelim equivalent and that was brought up when he came to Dallas. It doesn’t matter, he said. He said wouldn’t take a horse to anything if it couldn’t compress and lengthen it’s stride. It’s essentially the foundation of his method.

After watching him teach for two days, the value in this training is apparent. BTW, Kim is also a real stickler for impulsion and being able to ride forward to the fence on a controllable stride, as is Jim (Graham). These are the three trainers I’ve been exposed to mostly the past two years, and I really think their methods make sense.

I don’t think asking a horse to compress his stride, at amoeba level, is asking too much at all. It’s something you have to do as a fundamental step in flatwork, regardless. You say you must develop a steady, rhythmic, forward canter first. I ask you this, does a steady, rhythmic, forward canter not, by definition, carry an intrinsic degree of impulsion along with it?

If it’s frustrating to the horse, then you probably shouldn’t be schooling the question. To me that demonstrates a hole in his training. Because if I’m having to leave long and/or rush over solid obstacles, in a combination, I’m a danger to myself and my horse anyway.

The point of this thread was to introduce “types” of fences at earlier stages in the game. I’m all for that, and think it’s great for the horse and (probably even more so) the rider. But to address the question you must have resources and education which allows you to answer it. If you’re asked a question that requires compression - regardless of how big or how small it is - you need to be able to compress. Bottom line.

There are so many safety concerns about eventing, and really with just cause. Telling a green rider on a green horse to “just stay out of his way and let him figure it out” is toxic, the more I think about it. If the rider is talented, with natural balance, and the horse is correspondingly brave, they can fake it really well. (Ask me how I know this.)

And I think it’s a real duplication of mental and physical effort - especially in this country - when, once a comfortable level of skill is assessed, the pair must go back and begin to “finesse” and “pick apart” the current ride. I want my horse to be well-schooled enough on the flat that if I give him the aid for a 9-foot canter stride, he gives me a 9-foot canter stride, whether we’re jumping or in the dressage ring.

Incidentally, I cannot think of hardly any Novice courses in Area V that have related distance combinations. (Can you Dezi?) Oh, wait. While they’re numbered seperately, there is somewhat of a combination at an event called Greenwood in Weatherford, Texas. You jump out of the woodline over a coop, go maybe 6-8 strides, then have a rockwall between two trees that walks 4 strides to some log/brush fence.

I know this combination too well. Because I was riding a horse that couldn’t compress, we jumped out over the coop, barrelled “forward” to the rockwall and, because we couldn’t compress (and because her attention was on something other than the fence - namely the active warmup area closeby) I took a nosedive into a tree at about 400 mpm. She locked-on too late, realized she couldn’t do it, and tried to glance off to the left. Unfortunately, the standard was a sizeable oak tree. Fortunately she had enough self-preservation to stop herself. I, of course, took the secondary impact!

Now, do I wish I’d done a little more flatwork/compression preparation before that event? Absolutely!

Robby

You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.

This has been a great thread. Forgive me if I’m asking something that has already been discussed, but I only skimmed some of this.

A lot of people have brought up Marlborough this year. That was my guy’s first Training level event and I thought it was really tough, although he did well enough (a “Surprise!” stop at the bank, which he simply didn’t expect, and still a sixth placing). I was worried about the water, but more so about the last six or so fences which were like three combinations in a row, right at the end of the course.

THEN he did Waredaca, which my rider thought was more difficult, but I thought was disappointingly easy for someone trying to get a talented horse useful experience (the plan was for him to do prelim at Virginia next). It’s been years and years since I was involved in eventing, but someone, please, what was your impression of those two events?

Also, on the BN/N issue: I think BN for greenies is just a matter of knowing when its time to move up. My guy won his first event at BN and that was the end of him going BN (and after a 2nd at N, that, too, seemed to indicate to me that he didn’t need to stay there either). Isn’t that reasonable? If it’s easy and the horse finishes the course confident and looking for more, don’t you think it’s better (provided the rider is capable) to move on to keep the horse challenged and thinking, rather than risk boredom or carelessness?

Sportponies Unlimited
Specializing in fancy, athletic, 3/4-TB ponies.
http://www.sportponiesunlimited.com

Robby I have to say I think your compression/expansion requirements to start at US Novice are pretty tough. Keep in mind that when Blyth starts a horse that same horse may very well be doing its first 3-day in 12 to 18 months–or even less–even if that starting point would be the equivilant to US Novice.

You (I assume) and I are going to stick around at the lower levels and smell the flowers a bit longer! You know, a year or so at Novice, another year at Training then maybe if things have been going really well a 3-day 3-4 years after our first event.

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Weatherford–a couple of questions. Do you think that riders “over there” in general spend more time riding in the open. Not necessarily hunting, just hacking around, down roads or any place less secure than the boundries of what ever farm their on? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Absolutely! EVEN the ones who do NOT ride out in the way we think of it, at least ride OUT of the ring. Most of the SJ events are held on the grass, so you have to know how to do that!

And I agree fully with your discussion with Roger!

19 year member of the New Hope clique!

but i don’t know if they do it. anyone from indiana/ohio/kentucky know if they have hunter paces around here?

i’ll look into the possibility of having the ICTA do something like that, but i’m not sure how to go about it. i’ll start by writing a letter i guess.

time flies like the wind, fruit flies like bananas.

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Weatherford:
I don’t think not having a trainer IS bad - it means people need to do their homework at home! By homework, I mean basics - like riding forward and developing a secure seat.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes, Weatherford, that was part of what I was trying to get at. Turning and controling pace are basic skills that should be in place before riding in the open. Courses should not be built to accomodate those who have not mastered such basic skills. Instead, courses should encourage people to learn at home and educate them as to what is missing or should be improved.

As for riding with or without a trainer at shows – I have always worked consistently with a trainer at home, and my trainers have always insisted that I be prepared to be entirely on my own at a show if necessary – if, for example, ride times conflict. My trainers have always made every effort to walk my courses, warm me up, and provide feedback after my ride – but they have also made sure that I could prepare myself (or seek out help from someone else) if they were not able to be there. After all, your trainer can’t do anything for you while you are actually on course – it is up to you when it really counts! --Jess

That’s it exactly – that combo at Marlborough would have been much less intimidating had it been 6" smaller. I agree that it doesn’t matter to the horse, all other things being equal, but if you are on a green horse (or, in my case, a horse new to Training with some confidence issues), if it matters to the rider, it CAN matter to the horse.
Curiously, earlier on that same course, they had an option where the short way required more accuracy than the long way…but both options were SO small that it was sort of a wash.
I think this gets back to the (futile, I guess) proposal that we have some gradations within the levels. That little option was nice for riders moving up from Novice – fence itself was very soothing, and you could practice deciding which option to ride, which is a pretty new experience for most riders at that level. But that later combo was more appropriate for a solid, confirmed Training level rider, one who is beginning to think about Prelim questions.
I know we’ve decided that grading courses within levels is impractical; I suppose what I would vote for is course design that is a bit more consistent within the course itself – how many times have those of you who do the lower levels found that the same course had both “bottom of the level” and “top of the level” questions?
I don’t know ANYTHING about course design, and I’d like to learn, so perhaps this idea stems more from ignorance than anything else, but…

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by tle:

Ditch/Log or Log/Ditch… the former is actually more friendly. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I think it’s probably safe to say, at this point, that this is entirely contingent on the rider and the horse.

What’s comfortable for you may not be comfortable for me. And in the world of cross-country, it’s all about the rider!

Maybe the crux of this is that a horse should be adjustable enough to do any combination of related distance questions.

I can’t stop thinking that it would be kinder to the horse - even if he lands and props - to use the prop as a “free half-halt” and keep coming softly to the ditch.

In my mind, I would ride forward to a ditch, and on a green horse I think that type of question would still have them thinking and not 100% focused on the next task at hand. As we all know, five strides can come up fast!

In education and training it’s a standard that you start small and build up. So it’s understandable that you ask the easy question first, then the hard one.

Robby

You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by subk:

But one thing to consider about inattentiveness. What’s there about BN to get your horse’s attention in the first place. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

OH, nothing! I am now thinking that it doesn’t really matter which I am doing, I just have to get his attention! (SJ & dressage are no problem)

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Also concerning a max combination at the lower levels. Usally when I see this type of question, if the course has been well designed, the horse will have answered the problems separately in some way earlier on the course. If the max question comes out of left field, to me it’s a sign of poor course design. Perhaps when you walk you can look for these things and just realizing that you’ve already had some prep fences can give you a bit a confidence boost for the combo.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Hey, I think that’s pretty much what they did at Marlborough…worked up to that combination. Isn’t that clever, and would explain why asterick’s horse went so well!!

This has been a most informative discussion!!

When you give a personal lesson in meanness to a critter or to a person, don’t be surprised if they learn their lesson- A Cowboy’s Guide to Life

We have some thoughts and concensus here - WHO is going to talk about it at the USEA Annual meeting?

Who can bring Denny & Jimmy & Roger into the discussion - so something can be done?

Granted, building technical courses means having more educated course builders at the lower levels, however, I believe that is happening in Eventing (unlike SJ! )

I would talk about it, for sure, but I am not going to be there - so, someone will have to do so for me!

Please?!

(now that I have, as Heather puts it, returned to the Dark Side…:wink: )

19 year member of the New Hope clique!

I found this post really interesting, now that I have a new greenie and am trying to read his ability and what and when he might be ready for. A couple of thoughts and a question.
I was at the Blythe Tait clinic that Robby put on, at training/prelim move up. The point I got from the pole excercise is that when fences get more technical, you must be able to have control over exactly what your horses stride is. It was a hard excercise and lots of horses struggled. But much like leg yield or shoulder in, you must practice it even green horses and riders, you might not be able to get a 10 in a 6, but you could work on a 7 and a 5 in a 6.
Not all technical fences should be at lower levels, like bounces, but little trekheners, “skinniers”, off-set 2 stride combos and maybe corner with options, would be cool!

My question is why is it that many folks, refuse to do a recognized ht at beginner novice? I find no shame in starting my greenie and keeping him at BN until he is ready to move up. But I seem to hear that it is a waste of time and $$ for and experienced rider to do a recognize HT at BN. Has anyone else heard a lot of people say this???

Trend? What trend, where? Who said anything about a trend…you’d never guess we work with the same trainer would you?

By the way Gotspots, one of these days I’m going to figure out just who you are! There’s a couple a people who I hope you’re not but I doubt that’s you–you sound much to reasonable to be that irratating. Do you know who I am? How is it possible that we ride with the same person and I’m to stupid to know exactly who you are? Other than I live 2 1/2 hours away…

Hi to all this morning.
After seeing and riding on several Fl courses and watching the differences in the flow of the rides depending on the courses, I guess I would definitely vote for the baby versions of upper level questions on Novice and above. I would disagree on having closely (ie: less than 4-5 strides) related fences on Novice.

I would rather have a lower level rider schooling related fences on their own time and not have to worry about it on course. The majority of riders I see on Novice are kids, adult ammies out for a good time and occasionally pros on very green horses.

I’d like the kids to have fun and be safe, same for the ammies, and the movin’-on-up crew/pros pretty much know how to train for 1-2 strides and bounces. However I think it would be fun to encourage them all to see and jump small, fun , individual fences. I loved the post above about the sunken road, that’s exactly the type of question I think should be started at the beginning.

Terry

I just started reading this thread today, and wanted to comment.

Poombadesign said:
Some events have the same kind of jump, just different sizes, but these are usually only single jumps and not combinations. But there was one event I heard of (maybe Southern Pines??
Don’t hold me to it) that was P/I/A and had a lot of the same just different sizes.

I competed at Five Points HT at the Novice Level in September. I was able to do my first sunken road. The novice horses went down a slope into the sunken road (we trotted), go a stride,and jump up a bank. Then it was 2 or 3 strides on a bending line to a log. That log wasn’t too high, and it was a great introduction to the sunken road with another element afterwards (numbered separately.)
Each level had a more difficult version of the sunken road.

The bank complex was huge, but the novice horses jumped up, went across, went down a little slope, and a few strides later, another jump. 5 Points does a great job of having the same type of stuff for the Novice level as the upper levels, but at an appropriate height and combination.

I really enjoyed the course! I wish other course designers would introduce similar fences.

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Janet:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> That doesn’t happen here in the states. People ride in rings. Around and around and around.
They jump fences that fall down, so the forward, connected ride is not as necessary (in their
perspective, not mine). They go for trail rides once a week. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I sincerely hope you are not advocating entering a horse trial (at ANY level) WITHOUT schooling cross country fences. THAT could be disasterous.

And, yes, if you haven’t done it before, you DEFINITELY need an isntructor to teach you how to ride forward AND definsively cross country. But that is a very different issue from having a trainer with you at the event<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Did you read my original post in its entirety? Not quite sure how you managed to interpret it in that manner. I was simply pointing out that the reason people here need coaches to learn to ride x-c is because they do not have the opportunity to get outside the ring on a regular basis.

I think, triggerfoot, her point is, and certainly is the case in Pony Club, you do your homework at home. And you experience events as a friend, volunteer, etc, before actually competing. And, you go to other kinds of shows before your first event.

Yes, there are Officials at PC ralleys that can step in if there is a problem - but, the point is, the kids are prepared (they earn their place on their teams) before they go - AND, since they do go as teams, they HELP EACH OTHER.

Linda Allen told me that she was dumbfounded (and VERY impressed!) by the Pony Clubbers she coached at the National Pony Finals. She said, they didn’t need me! They knew how to walk their courses, how to warm up their ponies, what kind of warm up and how long, etc etc. It allowed her to coach them on a more sophisticated, for example, strategy for certain kinds of courses, etc.

The same is true of a pony club “D” team going to its first event - the kids are prepared.

(You should join! )

(By the way, she also said that had her PC team members been allowed to be judged in the Individual Pony Jumper Finals, 2 or 3 of them would have been in the top 4! Unfortunately, they were not allowed to be judged, as they were there by invitation rather than qualification, therefore, the Pony Committee didn’t think they were qualified… )

19 year member of the New Hope clique!

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> see this as a potential problem. if there was no such thing as BN, my first event ever would
have been N (i probably would have survived it, but that’s only 'cause i have hj experience, so
at least i’m used to the show jitters and dealing with hyper horsies in new environments).
otherwise, i would have had to go trainerless, which i think we can ALL agree is bad.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Nope. Don’t “agree that it is bad.”

<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Master Tally mentioned watching a couple beginner types school cross country. My question is: where in the world is thier trainer? Maybe this is the real problem with lower levels–it’s the lack of good consistent help that is causing people to ride too fast or to slow? I hate to think if it weren’t for my instructor, I might have been one of those riders. Scary thought, but it’s true. When you are ignorant, it’s awfully easy to make mistakes. And when you don’t know what is causing the problems, it’s twice as hard to correct it.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Oh, I had to laugh at that comment. This IS one of the problems and USEA is trying to address this through the Instructor certification. When I was doing BN and Novice, I did have an instructor who would go out XC schooling with me, give me a weekly lesson, go to events with me, walk courses, warm me up, etc. Was I ignorant and misguided? HELL YES!!! My problem wasn’t that I didn’t have an instructor… it was that I had an instructor who was ignorant and I didn’t know any better!! Two sides of the same coin. And when you’re ignorant, you don’t know what you don’t know. So the question then becomes, how do we find and inform those who don’t know any better??


If Dressage is a Symphony… Eventing is Rock & Roll!!!

“All’s well that ends with cute E.R. doctors, I always say.” – Buffy

I’ve competed BN and Novice in Michigan, and in my limitede experience, most BN and many novice courses are comprised of logs, bigger logs, and creative ways to arrange logs, telephone poles, tires and rocks. There are coops and tables, and there will usually be a little bank or ditch, but all are single fences with big gallop spaces in between. There have been a lot of improvements in recent years, and Michigan does have some really great places to school, but I haven’t really felt challenged by the novice fences I’ve encountered.

It wasn’t until I rode at a newly built Novice course last month (Richland Park) that I was confronted with options and multiple fences in combination. It was awesome to see at the novice level. It really made me have to think and adjust throughout the course. (Incidentally, it felt SO good it made me think I could maybe move up to Training in the next year - thus the difficulties schooling on Saturday ).

Anyway, I would love to have smaller versions of the more difficult fences to prepare for the higher levels. It only makes sense!

[This message was edited by maplebrook on Oct. 20, 2002 at 12:08 PM.]

So when we walked that Marlborough course, I (and several of my friends) thought “no way will Notch jump this thing”…but by the time we GOT there, as I’ve said, he really locked and loaded and just flew over it…
so I suppose, looking back on it, we’d already had a large brush and rail at the 2nd fence (early challenge to commit to biggish vertical fences), a one stride bank to vertical, 2 helsinkis that were just as big and telephone-poley as the later angled logs (though as single fences), and, last but not least, 2 stone walls on a sharp turning line to make sure everyone’s talking to each other.
As a new/lower level eventer, it’s very easy for me to get fixated on scary questions late in the course, but I can see that in this instance, and in several others, the riding of the course itself made those questions more “flowing” and less “aliens have set this awful thing down for me to jump,” if you see what I mean.
Thanks, subk, GotSpots, and bgoosewood, for thoughtful answers!