Ok… I read it.
I still think that article is utter horseshit. Pardon the pun. Blaming the horse in any equestrian discipline is ALWAYS poor form. ALWAYS.
I wish I had a link to where I read about the history of the sport of pentathlon, and I will likely butcher it… but here you go… I’ll do my best to summarize.
The sport was conceived of as a way to test a cavalry officer from a prior age (late 19th / early 20th century). The thought as I understand it was, “What if a cavalry officer was given an urgent message and had to deliver it in a battlefield situation? Could the officer complete the task and meet and overcome any and all obstacles in his path? Could he tirelessly run, swim, fight (with sword or gun) and grab a random, available horse from any cavalry string, and go across potentially hostile terrain with obstacles in the way, and succeed in delivering the message?”
So… if that is the thought process at the heart of the development of this sport… then the whole test is for Annika to make due with the horse she got. If it all went to hell with the hypothetical random cavalry horse in the field, then I guess she would have either:
A. Had to run, swim, fence and shoot just that much better in order to succeed in her mission…
or
B. She would have failed in her mission